ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07195253OMF21Updated Apr 3, 2026

Oro-myofunctional Characteristics and Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Infants With Down Syndrome

An observational study in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21), sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 5 Months to 6 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-03.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
5 Months to 6 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is characterised by repetitive collapse of the upper airway during sleep, inducing breathing disturbances that can result in oxygen desaturation and frequent arousals. In children, OSA can have long-term consequences on the development and on the cardiovascular system.

Down Syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder associated with intellectual disability and many comorbidities. The prevalence of OSA is particularly high in patients with DS, from infancy. In a recent study by Fauroux et al. (2024), OSA was diagnosed in 97% infants and early diagnosis and intervention from the age of 6 months was associated with better neurocognitive outcome at 3 years old. However, polysomnography (PSG - the gold standard method for diagnosing OSA) is poorly accessible, highlighting the need to develop new strategies to prevent and to screen OSA early in infancy.

OSA can be linked to some orofacial abnormalities presented by patients with DS. Indeed, orofacial functions and structures ca play a crucial role in OSA. For example, nose breathing allows the tongue to act as a stimulator of the transverse maxillary growth during childhood, allowing the upper airway to develop properly.

The primary objective of the present study is to explore the relationships between oro-myo-facial functions, more specifically non-nutritive sucking, and the severity of OSA in 6 months old infants with DS.

The main hypothesis is that OSA severity (estimated by the obstructive apnea hypopnea index on PSG) will be negatively correlated to non-nutritive sucking performance.

Data from this study could help developing easily accessible protocols for OSA screening based on simple sucking recording. Some interventions could also be tested to prevent OSA from the beginning of life, like an innovative pacifier recently developed by a French start-up to stimulate nose breathing and to promote correct positioning of the tongue.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21)

Keywords

  • sleep apnea
  • Down Syndrome
  • oro-myofunctional development
  • sleep
  • non-nutritive sucking
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

2,240 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 475 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 105 across 666 observational studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Months to 6 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study involves 6-month-old infants diagnosed with Down syndrome.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

(infants with Down Syndrome)

  • Aged 6 months (±3 weeks)
  • Diagnosed with Trisomy 21
  • Affiliated to a social security scheme
  • With of the 2 legal representatives

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with mosaic Down syndrome
  • Born preterm (gestation age at birth \<37 weeks)
  • Treated for OSA with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
  • Known allergy to silicone
  • Currently participating to an interventional study protocol implying an ongoing exclusion period from other studies
  • Refusal from legal representatives.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Infants with Down Syndrome

    6 month-old infants with Down Syndrome recorded by polysomnography

    Diagnostic Test: Polysomnography (PSG) to explore OSA · Other: Oro-myo-functional clinical evaluation · Other: Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children · Other: Non-nutritive sucking recording · Behavioral: Neurocognitive evaluation · Other: PedsQL-Infants · Other: Sleep Hygiene Scale for Children

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPolysomnography (PSG) to explore OSA

    Patients will undergo full-night PSG (including electrocardiogram to monitor heart rate and the JAWAC system to record mandibular movements) in the sleep unit of Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant (Bron, France) to explore OSA, included in the routine care of children with DS. OSA diagnosis will be made based on the obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) resulting from the PSG. OSA will be diagnosed when OAHI ≥1.5/hour.

  • OtherOro-myo-functional clinical evaluation

    Orofacial myofunctional evaluation will be conducted by a physiotherapist according to the OMES-E (Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores for Nursing Infants).

  • OtherSleep Disturbance Scale for Children

    The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children is a short questionnaire answered by parents about their child's sleep disorders. Total score and scores for each sleep disorder will be calculated, according to the classical procedures during hospitalization of all children in our sleep unit.

  • OtherNon-nutritive sucking recording

    Non-nutritive sucking performance will be recorded through an experimental method using a classical pacifier, equipped with pressure sensors. Recording will last about 10 minutes. Variables related to sucking performance (maximum amplitude, frequency of sucking bursts, etc.) will be recorded.

  • BehavioralNeurocognitive evaluation

    The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (4th edition) will be administered by a neuropsychologist. Five subset scores (cognitive, receptive communication, expressive communication, fine motor, gross motor) will be calculated, along with three composite scores (cognitive, language, motor).

  • OtherPedsQL-Infants

    The PedsQL-Infants questionnaire is designed to evaluate quality of life in infants. It will be given to parents during their child's hospitalization.

  • OtherSleep Hygiene Scale for Children

    The Sleep Hygiene Scale for Children is a short questionnaire answered by parents about behavioral sleep disorders. Total result ("sleep hygiene issue" : yes/no) and three scores (attachment parenting, translational coping, screen exposure) will be calculated, according to the classical procedures during hospitalization of all young children in our sleep unit.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of peaks composing sucking bursts and obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI)

    Number of peaks during sucking bursts will be measured by non-nutritive sucking recording. OAHI will be measured by PSG.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Oro-facial myo-functional characteristics

    Variables obtained from electrophysiological (non-nutritive sucking recording) and clinical (OMES-E: 1 total score + 12 subscores) examination of oro-facial myo-functional characteristics.

    Time frame: D1

  2. Respiratory PSG indices

    Obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), respiratory effort-related arousal index (RERA), mean CO2, time spent with CO2 \>50mmHg, mean SpO2, desaturation index \>3%, pulse wave amplitude drop (PWAD), hypoxic burden. PSG sleep architecture parameters: total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (TST / time in bed), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), percentage of sleep stages (N1, N2, N3, REM), arousal index, awakening index, mandibular movement index.

    Time frame: Night between Day 1 and Day 2.

  3. Subjective parental evaluation of sleep disorders on the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC)

    SDSC: 1 total score and subscores (insomnia, sleep disordered breathing, non-restorative sleep)

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Subjective parental evaluation of sleep hygiene on the Sleep Hygiene Scale for Children (SHSC)

    1 total result ("sleep hygiene issue" : yes/no) and three scores (attachment parenting, translational coping, screen exposure)

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Heart rate variability (HRV)

    Time-domain HRV indices: RR, HR, NN50, pNN50, SDNN, RMSSD Frequency-domain HRV indices: Ptot, VLF, LF, HF, LFnu, HFnu, LF/HF ratio. HRV measures will be compared between the sample of children with DS and a control group of healthy children from the AuBE cohort.

    Time frame: Night between Day 1 and Day 2.

  6. Electrophysiological evaluation of sucking

    All other variables obtained from non-nutritive sucking recording

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Neuropsychological evaluation

    Neurosychological evaluation will be conducted by an experienced neuropsychologist using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (4th edition). Total score and subscores (posture, hand-eye coordination, language, sociability) will be collected.

    Time frame: Day 2

  8. Quality of life on the PedsQL

    Results of the PedsQL consist in 1 total score + 5 subscores (physical functioning, physical symptoms, emotional functioning, social functioning, cognitive functioning)

    Time frame: Day 1

  9. Clinical examination of oro-facial myo-functional characteristics

    Variables obtained from clinical examination of oro-facial myo-functional characteristics driven by an experienced physiotherapist following the Expanded protocole of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-E).

    Time frame: Day 2

  10. PSG sleep architecture parameters

    Total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency (TST / time in bed), sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), percentage of sleep stages (N1, N2, N3, REM), arousal index, awakening index, mandibular movement index

    Time frame: Night between Day 1 and Day 2.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Service d'épileptologie clinique, des troubles du sommeil et de neurologie fonctionnelle de l'enfant
    Bron, 69500, France
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2028, 24 months after the start.

Of 258 non-industry observational studies under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 61. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 294 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 2, 2025
First posted
Sep 26, 2025
StartActual
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 1, 2028
Last update
Apr 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07195253
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 26, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2026

Study contacts

Patricia PF FRACO, MD, PhD
Contact
patricia.franco@chu-lyon.fr
+33 4 27 85 60 52
Aurore GUYON, PHD
Contact
aurore.guyon@chu-lyon.fr
+33 4 27 85 52 47

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion