ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07192328Updated Sep 25, 2025

Dose-Efficacy of rTMS in Healthy Young Female Volunteers

An interventional study of rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally). in Fecal Incontinence (FI) and Healthy Female Volunteer, sponsored by Hospital de Mataró. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-25.

Sponsored by Hospital de Mataró · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Sep 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is aimed to develop a new therapy based on non-invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation rehabilitation for FI in patients who do not respond to conventional therapies.

Read the detailed description

AIMS 1) General: to develop a new therapy based on non-invasive repetitive magnetic stimulation rehabilitation for FI in patients who do not respond to conventional therapies. 2) Specific: a) To evaluate the optimal dose of cortical magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rTLS) in young healthy women for its subsequent application in patients with FI. b) To assess the effect of rTMS and rTLS on continence, clinical severity, and QoL in women with FI.

DESIGN: 1. Cross-over clinical trial dose-efficacy study: Evaluation of the dose-efficacy of acute rTMS and rTLS in 30 healthy young women. Frequencies will be evaluated for cortical rTMS (1Hz and 5Hz) and 3 rTLS (1, 5, and 10Hz).

02

Conditions studied

  • Fecal Incontinence (FI)
  • Healthy Female Volunteer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Motor Evoked Potentials
  • Healthy Volunteers
  • Neuromodulation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Fecal Incontinence
03

In context

Fecal Incontinence

283 studies on the registry are indexed under Fecal Incontinence; 52 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 50 across 203 interventional studies indexed under Fecal Incontinence.

Browse Fecal Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital de Mataró is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • no history of FI
  • Be a woman
  • capable of understanding and providing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy and the ability to become pregnant
  • presence of a pacemaker
  • history of epilepsy or neurosurgery
  • poor treatment tolerance
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rTMS 1Hz

    rTMS delivered with 250 pulses via double-cone coil at either 1 Hz

    Device: rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally).

  • Experimental
    rTMS 5Hz

    rTMS delivered with 250 pulses via double-cone coil at either 5 Hz

    Device: rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally).

  • Experimental
    rTLSMS 1Hz

    rTLSMS (lumbar and sacral), 2400 pulses (600 per hotspot) applied at 1 Hz, using a 70mm refrigerated air film coil

    Device: rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally).

  • Experimental
    rTLSMS 5Hz

    rTLSMS (lumbar and sacral), 2400 pulses (600 per hotspot) applied at 5 Hz, using a 70mm refrigerated air film coil

    Device: rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally).

  • Experimental
    rTLSMS 10Hz

    rTLSMS (lumbar and sacral), 2400 pulses (600 per hotspot) applied at 10 Hz, using a 70mm refrigerated air film coil

    Device: rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally).

Interventions

  • DevicerTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally).

    rTMS and rTLSMS administered using a Magstim Rapid2 repetitive stimulator at pre-identified hotspots (cortical, lumbar, and sacral regions bilaterally. rTMS delivered with 250 pulses via the same double-cone coil used for the neurophysiological study, at either 1 Hz or 5 Hz. For rTLSMS (lumbar and sacral), 2400 pulses (600 per hotspot) were applied at 1 Hz, 5 Hz, or 10 Hz using a 70mm refrigerated air film coil (Magstim, UK). Each dose and stimulation site (cortical or peripheral) were tested in separate sessions.

    Also known as: rTMS, Neurostimulation, Neuromodulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MEP Latency

    Latency from the onset of the stimuli (cortical or lumbosacral) to the first deflection of the MEP waveform.

    Time frame: Baseline (immediately before stimulation) and immediately after stimulation in each session, across 5 weekly sessions (up to 5 weeks).

Secondary outcomes

  1. MEP amplitude

    Amplitude measured peak-to-peak of the MEP waveform.

    Time frame: Baseline (immediately before stimulation) and immediately after stimulation in each session, across 5 weekly sessions (up to 5 weeks).

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital de Mataró
    Mataró, Barcelona 08304, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rao SSC, Yan Y, Xiang X, Sharma A, Ayyala D, Hamdy S. Effects of Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy on Gut and Brain Interactions and Anorectal Neuropathy in Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Study. Neuromodulation. 2021 Oct;24(7):1269-1277. doi: 10.1111/ner.13485. Epub 2021 Jun 22. PubMed 34156730 ↗
  • Tantiphlachiva K, Attaluri A, Valestin J, Yamada T, Rao SS. Translumbar and transsacral motor-evoked potentials: a novel test for spino-anorectal neuropathy in spinal cord injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 May;106(5):907-14. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.478. Epub 2011 Jan 25. PubMed 21266960 ↗
  • Xiang X, Patcharatrakul T, Sharma A, Parr R, Hamdy S, Rao SSC. Cortico-anorectal, Spino-anorectal, and Cortico-spinal Nerve Conduction and Locus of Neuronal Injury in Patients With Fecal Incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 May;17(6):1130-1137.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 10. PubMed 30213585 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Sharing individual participant data is a decision we still have not taken

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 14 months.

Of 70 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fecal Incontinence, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 57. This study's 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 86 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 16, 2025
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
StartActual
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completionActual
Apr 1, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 1, 2025
Last update
Sep 25, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07192328
Lead sponsor
Hospital de Mataró
Responsible party
Lluís Mundet (Principal Investigator GI Motility Unit, Hospital de Mataró) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2025
Start date
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2025
Completion
Jun 1, 2025
Last update
Sep 25, 2025

Study contacts

Lluís Mundet, RN, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital de Mataró
Pere Clavé, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Hospital de Mataró

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion