ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07189481TTOCUpdated Sep 24, 2025

Design and Evaluation of a Team Timeout Checklist (TTOC) to Improve Information Exchange in the Operating Room Before Skin Incision

An observational study in Checklist, Teamwork and Information Exchange, sponsored by University of Jena. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-24.

Sponsored by University of Jena · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
151
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, we designed and evaluated a team timeout checklist (TTOC) which aimed at improving team communication and information exchange before skin incision. The WHO surgical safety checklist was used as a basis with the following changes: we clarified the wording of specific items (e.g., surgical site), we clarified checks by denoting separate items involved for each check, and we denoted circulating nurses as responsible for checklist readout and adherence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Checklist
  • Teamwork
  • Information Exchange

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • checklist
  • timeout
  • teamwork
  • communication
03

In context

Communication

719 studies on the registry are indexed under Communication; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 151 is above the median of 104 across 132 observational studies indexed under Communication.

Browse Communication studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Jena is the lead sponsor of 89 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

OR personnel working in orthopedics and traumatology: surgeons, anesthesiologists, anesthesia nurses, circulating nurses, technical support staff

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Personnel working in the operating room (nurses, surgeons, anesthesiologists, technical support staff)

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anyone who did not give their oral consent to be observed during surgeries
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
151 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • pre-post intervention study

    teams were observed before and after checklist use

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. information exchange

    this measure assessed whether all sub-items on the TTOC were adequately checked and respective information audibly shared in the team

    Time frame: from the time patients were rolled into the OR until skin incision

  2. team communication

    using a validate coding scheme, we assessed how team members communicated with each other using professional coding software to log a set of ten behaviors (e.g., instructions, questions, confirmations, speaking up...)

    Time frame: from the time patients were rolled into the OR until skin incision

Secondary outcomes

  1. duration of pre skin incision period with and without checklist

    to assess how long the period before incision takes with and without TTOC

    Time frame: from the time patients were rolled into the OR until skin incision

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Leipzig
    Leipzig, Germany
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2024 to primary completion in May 2025, 9 months.

Of 51 non-industry observational studies under Communication, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 61. This study's 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 53 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 61.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 16, 2025
First posted
Sep 24, 2025
StartActual
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completionActual
May 31, 2025
CompletionActual
May 31, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07189481
Lead sponsor
University of Jena
Responsible party
Mona Weiss (Professor Mona Weiss, PhD, University of Jena) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 24, 2025
Start date
Aug 1, 2024
Primary completion
May 31, 2025
Completion
May 31, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion