An observational study in Acromegaly Due to Pituitary Adenoma and Acromegaly, sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-18.
Sponsored by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS · Observational
Acromegaly, a chronic condition characterized by growth hormone (GH) and, in turn, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) excess, is burdened by a series of systemic and metabolic comorbidities that strongly impair quality of life (QoL) and life expectancy. Amongst them, a specific acromegalic osteopathy has been discovered, characterized by fragility fractures associated with high bone turnover, which need to be early detected, according to most recent guidelines, since they are very frequent and related to chronic pain and reduced QoL. Morphometric vertebral fractures (VFs) are an emerging landmark of skeletal fragility in general population as well as in clinical trials, and are highly prevalent in acromegaly, being reported to affect from 30 up to 60% of patients and represent an early and common event in disease history. Until now, same groups of patients with higher risk of vertebral fractures were identified, such as those carrying incident vertebral fractures, or affected by biochemical active acromegaly, concomitant hypogonadism, or diabetes mellitus. The main aim in the management of patients with acromegaly is to normalize IGF-I levels and restore acromegaly related symptoms. To aim this treatment objective, the first line of treatment of acromegaly, when feasible, is neurosurgery. In cases where surgical intervention fails to achieve biochemical control, medical therapy is recommended, with the objective of reaching normal levels of IGF-1 and GH age-corrected. Octreotide LAR and Lanreotide are the first-line medical therapy. In patients who have not achieved adequate control with standard doses of octreotide LAR and Lanreotide, increasing the dose and/or frequency of administration can lead to improved biochemical control. In patients who are unable to achieve control even with this approach, a switch to Pasireotide LAR may be considered. In instances where patients fail to achieve biochemical control with maximal doses of SRL, or in the presence of contraindications, the use of Pegvisomant as a second-line therapy may be considered. In addition, a combination of Pegvisomant and SRL represents a potential avenue for treating patients. Prevention of VFs in acromegaly remains an open issue. It has been shown that use of GH/IGF-I lowering treatments with first-generation SSA and Pegvisomant, may reduce the risk of VFs, while improving disease control. Moreover, in a retrospective and observational multicenter study, it was recently proved that patients treated with second generation SRLs (Pasireotide-LAR) developed less frequently VFs then patients treated with Pegvisomant.
202 studies on the registry are indexed under Acromegaly; 19 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 100 across 81 observational studies indexed under Acromegaly.
Browse Acromegaly studies →Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS is the lead sponsor of 952 studies on the registry; 541 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
n the prospective cohort will be included patients with diagnosis of acromegaly not-controlled after 6 months of treatment with first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) with IGF-I upper the age-adjusted limit of normality, and treated for at least one week with Pasireotide Lar, according to clinical practice In the retrospective cohort will be included patients with diagnosis of acromegaly not-controlled after 6 months of treatment with first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) with IGF-I upper the age-adjusted limit of normality, and treated with Pegvisomant from 01.01.2010 to 31-12- 2024 (including follow-up data).
INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR THE PROSPECTIVE COHORT
INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR THE RETROSPECTIVE COHORT
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
PROSPECTIVE COHORT switched to Pasireotide LAR after fg-SRLs, according to clinical practice
Diagnostic Test: morphometric spine radiography
RETROSPECTIVE COHORT switched to Pegvisomant after fg-SRLs, according to clinical practice
Diagnostic Test: morphometric spine radiography
Patients already on treatment with Pasireotide LAR or Pegvisomant will be evaluated using morphometric spine radiography and lumbar and femoral densitometry. Patients will undergo a 1-year follow-up.
Also known as: lumbar and femoral densitometry
Comparison between Pasireotide LAR and Pegvisomant
The primary objective is to evaluate the rate of incidental vertebral fractures over 12 consecutive months of treatment with Pasireotide LAR, in comparison to the historical control arm which received Pegvisomant monotherapy.
Time frame: 36 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS →