CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07169838Updated Sep 12, 2025

Comparative Study of Perinatal Tissues for Clinical-Grade Mesenchymal Stem Cell Production and Cost-Effectiveness

An observational study in Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cell Banking and Perinatal Medical Waste, sponsored by Kayseri City Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-12.

Sponsored by Kayseri City Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This observational laboratory-based study was conducted to evaluate the clinical feasibility and cost-effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) production from perinatal medical waste, including umbilical cord, amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, and placenta. A total of 160 tissue samples were collected from women delivering at term, and standardized protocols were applied for microbial sterility testing, MSC isolation, and cost analysis under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions. The study compared MSC yield, contamination rates, and total processing costs across tissue types.

Read the detailed description

Perinatal medical waste, including the umbilical cord, amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, and placenta, represents a promising and ethically acceptable source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Unlike bone marrow or adipose-derived MSCs, which require invasive procedures and are limited by donor morbidity and age-related decline, perinatal tissues are collected non-invasively at the time of delivery and are usually discarded. This study was designed to optimize the clinical use of such tissues by systematically comparing their feasibility for large-scale MSC banking under Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) conditions.

This prospective observational study was conducted between January and June 2023 at Eskişehir Osmangazi University and Kayseri City Hospital. A total of 160 perinatal tissue samples were collected at term deliveries, including amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, umbilical cord (Wharton's jelly), whole placenta, and placental fragments. Samples were transferred to the GMP-compliant Cellular Therapy and Stem Cell Production Center for laboratory processing. Microbial contamination was assessed using the automated BACTEC™ FX system. MSCs were isolated through tissue-specific protocols, expanded in culture to passage 3, and characterized based on morphology and adherence criteria established by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT).

Quantitative outcomes included viable MSC yield per sample, sterility outcomes, and proliferative capacity. A detailed cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed, incorporating procurement, transportation, storage, reagents, disposables, and technician labor. Costs were standardized per 1×10⁶ viable MSCs and expressed in U.S. dollars according to the average 2023 exchange rate.

02

Conditions studied

  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Stem Cell Banking
  • Perinatal Medical Waste
  • Umbilical Cord Stem Cells

Keywords

  • Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Perinatal Medical Waste
  • Umbilical Cord
  • Stem Cell Banking
  • Cost-Effectiveness
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kayseri City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 47 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consisted of 160 healthy women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies who delivered at term (≥37 weeks) at Kayseri City Hospital and Eskişehir Osmangazi University Hospital in Türkiye. Participants were aged between 18 and 45 years. Perinatal tissues, including amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, umbilical cord, and placenta, were collected immediately after delivery as medical waste, with no additional intervention applied. All participants provided written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants only
  • Age between 18 and 45 years
  • Singleton, uncomplicated term pregnancies (≥37 weeks of gestation)
  • Delivery by either elective cesarean section or spontaneous vaginal birth
  • Written informed consent obtained prior to sample collection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of maternal infection at the time of delivery
  • Known fetal malformations or chromosomal abnormalities
  • Placental abnormalities (e.g., previa, abruption)
  • Preterm labor (\<37 weeks)
  • Any maternal comorbidity that may compromise tissue quality (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension, autoimmune disease)
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pregnant women at term delivery providing perinatal tissue samples

    Samples from this single cohort were divided into five tissue categories (amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, umbilical cord, placental fragments, whole placenta) for comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cell yield, sterility, and cost-effectiveness.

    Other: Perinatal Tissue Collection

Interventions

  • OtherPerinatal Tissue Collection

    Collection of perinatal medical waste (amniotic fluid, amniotic membrane, umbilical cord, placenta) at the time of term delivery for laboratory-based mesenchymal stem cell isolation and analysis. No therapeutic or interventional procedure was performed on participants.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Viable Mesenchymal Stem Cell Yield

    The average number of viable mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated per perinatal tissue sample (×10⁶ cells per sample).

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks after sample collection.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Microbial Contamination Rate

    Proportion of perinatal tissue samples testing positive for microbial growth using the BACTEC™ FX system.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours after collection.

  2. Cost per Million Viable MSCs

    Average total cost (USD) of producing 1×10⁶ viable MSCs, including procurement, storage, isolation, and sterility testing.

    Time frame: Calculated during the study period (January-June 2023).

  3. Population Doubling Time (PDT)

    The proliferative capacity of MSCs at passage 3, calculated as population doubling time (hours).

    Time frame: Assessed at day 6-8 of culture expansion.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kayseri City Hospital
    Kayseri, Kayseri 38130, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07169838
Lead sponsor
Kayseri City Hospital
Responsible party
Mehmet Copuroglu (M.D., Kayseri City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 12, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2023
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2023
Completion
Aug 1, 2025
Last update
Sep 12, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion