ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07742293CTS-TAPEUpdated Aug 7, 2026

Effects of Two Different Kinesiotaping Techniques in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

An interventional study of I-Strip Kinesiotaping and Standard Therapy and Button Hole Kinesiotaping and Standard Therapy in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, sponsored by Kayseri City Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Kayseri City Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the clinical, functional, and ultrasonographic effects of two different kinesiotaping techniques added to a standard exercise and night splint program in the treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: the I-Strip kinesiotaping technique group, the Button Hole kinesiotaping technique group, or a control group receiving only standard therapy. The study will assess treatment outcomes over a 12-week period using high-resolution ultrasound (specifically median nerve cross-sectional area and flattening ratio) and clinical parameters to determine the most effective conservative management approach.

Read the detailed description

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, typically managed conservatively with tendon and nerve gliding exercises alongside night splints. Recently, Kinesiotaping (KT) has gained popularity for its space-correction mechanism, which aims to increase microcirculation and reduce mechanical pressure on the median nerve. While immediate effects of KT have been studied, there is a lack of literature comparing the long-term structural and clinical effects of specific taping methods.

This prospective, randomized controlled, evaluator-blinded trial is designed to compare the 12-week efficacy of the original "I-Strip" and "Button Hole" kinesiotaping techniques when combined with standard exercise and splint therapy, against a standard therapy-only control group.

The primary objective is to investigate morphological changes in the median nerve using high-resolution neurosonography, specifically tracking the Cross-Sectional Area (CSA) and Flattening Ratio (FR) at the carpal tunnel inlet. Secondary objectives include evaluating improvements in pain and upper extremity functionality. By objectively monitoring structural recovery through dynamic ultrasound imaging, this study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations on the long-term anatomical and clinical benefits of different kinesiotaping applications in CTS management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

  • Kinesiotaping
  • Ultrasonography
  • Median Nerve
  • Exercise Therapy
03

In context

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

587 studies on the registry are indexed under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; 134 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 60 across 443 interventional studies indexed under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Browse Carpal Tunnel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Kayseri City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Being aged between 18 and 65 years.

  • Willingness and ability to sign the form.
  • Having symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome (hand numbness, tingling, pain) for at least 3 months.
  • Clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed by physical examination (positive Phalen/Tinel tests) and a prior nerve conduction study (EMG).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous wrist or hand surgery.
  • Severe carpal tunnel syndrome on EMG (evidence of thenar atrophy or severe motor loss).
  • History of trauma, fracture in the wrist area, or anatomical anomalies affecting ultrasonography.
  • Cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, or other concomitant upper extremity entrapment neuropathies.
  • Local injection to the carpal tunnel within the last 6 months.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Systemic corticosteroid use or inflammatory rheumatic diseases.
  • Cognitive impairment or psychiatric illness preventing comprehension of questionnaire instructions.
  • Lack of a prior EMG report upon admission to the outpatient clinic.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    I-Strip Kinesiotaping Group

    Participants will receive the original I-Strip kinesiotaping technique combined with standard exercise and a night splint program.

    Other: I-Strip Kinesiotaping and Standard Therapy · Other: Standard Exercise and Splint Therapy

  • Experimental
    Button Hole Kinesiotaping Group

    Participants will receive the Button Hole kinesiotaping technique combined with standard exercise and a night splint program.

    Other: Button Hole Kinesiotaping and Standard Therapy · Other: Standard Exercise and Splint Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Participants will only receive a standard exercise and overnight splint program.

    Other: Standard Exercise and Splint Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherI-Strip Kinesiotaping and Standard Therapy

    Application of the original I-Strip kinesiotaping technique combined with a standard program of tendon/nerve gliding exercises and a night splint for 12 weeks.

  • OtherButton Hole Kinesiotaping and Standard Therapy

    Application of the Button Hole kinesiotaping technique combined with a standard program of tendon/nerve gliding exercises and a night splint for 12 weeks.

  • OtherStandard Exercise and Splint Therapy

    Twelve weeks of tendon/nerve gliding exercises and night splinting.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Nerve Flattening Ratio (FR)

    Measurements will be taken at the pisiform bone level using resolution ultrasound.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

  2. Median Nerve Cross-Sectional Area (CSA)

    Using high-resolution ultrasound, measurements will be taken in millimeters square (mm2) at the pisiform bone level.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (Rest and activity pain intensity, 0-10 cm)

    Measured on a 0 to 100 mm scale (where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst imaginable pain); higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

  2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Numbness/Paresthesia (Median nerve trajectory, 0-10 cm)

    The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for numbness and paresthesia is a patient-reported outcome measure used to quantify the intensity of sensory disturbances along the median nerve distribution in the hand. Patients indicate the severity of their symptoms by making a mark on a 10 cm horizontal line anchored by "no numbness/paresthesia" (0 cm) and "worst imaginable numbness/paresthesia" (10 cm). The score is determined by measuring the distance in centimeters from the 0 baseline to the patient's mark. Higher scores reflect greater severity of sensory symptoms.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

  3. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) for Symptom Severity and Functional Status

    Symptom Severity Scale (SSS): Consists of 11 items assessing pain, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, nocturnal symptoms, and overall symptom patterns. Each item is scored from 1 (mildest) to 5 (most severe). The final SSS score is calculated as the mean of the completed items (ranging from 1 to 5). Functional Status Scale (FSS): Consists of 8 items evaluating the difficulty experienced in performing common daily activities requiring hand function (e.g., writing, buttoning clothes, holding a book, gripping objects). Each item is scored from 1 to 5. The final FSS score is calculated as the mean of the items (ranging from 1 to 5). For both subscales, higher scores indicate worse symptom severity and greater functional impairment.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

  4. Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) Questionnaire Score

    Scale from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of neuropathic pain.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

  5. Jamar Dynamometer Grip Strength in Kilograms (kg)

    The average of three consecutive measurements taken in kilograms (kg) using a Jamar dynamometer; higher values indicate better grip strength.

    Time frame: At baseline (T0), 3rd week (T1), and 12th week (T2)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant data underlying the results reported in the published article will be shared upon reasonable request directed to the corresponding author, starting from publication and ending 3 years following article publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning from the date of publication and extending for 3 years.

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a scientifically sound proposal and whose proposed use of data has been approved by the principal investigator. Requests can be directed to the corresponding author via email.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Aug 2026; primary completion for Feb 2027, 6 months later.

Of 251 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 261 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 25, 2026
First posted
Aug 3, 2026
StartEst.
Aug 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07742293
Lead sponsor
Kayseri City Hospital
Responsible party
Furkan Erdinc, MD (Medical Doctor, Kayseri City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 3, 2026
Start date
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Furkan Erdinc, MD
Contact
frkn.erdinc01@gmail.com
+905413216609

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion