ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07789795Updated Aug 27, 2026

Hemodynamic Effects of Bilateral and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia Using the Continuous Pressure Recording Analytical Method.

An interventional study of Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia and Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Spinal Anesthesia and Hemodynamic Changes, sponsored by Kayseri City Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-27.

Sponsored by Kayseri City Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled study aims to compare the intraoperative hemodynamic effects of unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. Seventy-four patients aged 65 years and older will be randomized into two groups: unilateral spinal anesthesia (n=37) and bilateral spinal anesthesia (n=37).

Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac output, stroke volume, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, and systemic vascular resistance will be continuously monitored using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM)-based MostCare monitoring system. Intraoperative fluid requirements and vasopressor consumption will also be evaluated.

The study seeks to determine whether unilateral spinal anesthesia provides greater hemodynamic stability and reduces the need for fluid administration and vasopressor support compared with conventional bilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

Hip arthroplasty is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure in elderly patients. Due to age-related physiological changes and the high prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities, maintenance of intraoperative hemodynamic stability is essential in this population. Spinal anesthesia is widely used for lower extremity orthopedic surgery; however, sympathetic blockade may result in hypotension and impaired tissue perfusion, particularly in elderly patients.

Unilateral spinal anesthesia has been proposed as an alternative technique that may reduce the extent of sympathetic blockade and provide greater cardiovascular stability compared with conventional bilateral spinal anesthesia. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the advanced hemodynamic effects of these two techniques remains limited.

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to compare the hemodynamic effects of unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. A total of 74 patients will be randomized to receive either unilateral spinal anesthesia (n=37) or bilateral spinal anesthesia (n=37).

Before spinal anesthesia, all participants will receive standard sedation with fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg) and midazolam (0.015-0.03 mg/kg). Hemodynamic monitoring will be performed using the MostCare monitoring system based on the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) through a radial arterial catheter.

The following hemodynamic parameters will be recorded at baseline, immediately after spinal anesthesia, and at predefined intraoperative time points: heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), oxygen delivery (DO2), oxygen delivery index (DO2I), maximal pressure rise during systole (dP/dtmax), cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE), and arterial elastance (Ea).

In addition, intraoperative vasopressor requirement (ephedrine use) and operative duration will be recorded and compared between study groups.

The primary objective is to determine whether unilateral spinal anesthesia provides superior hemodynamic stability compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. The investigators hypothesize that unilateral spinal anesthesia will be associated with reduced hemodynamic fluctuations and lower vasopressor requirements compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Anesthesia
  • Hemodynamic Changes

Keywords

  • Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia
  • Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia
  • PRAM
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring
  • Stroke Volume Variation
  • Pulse Pressure Variation
  • Vazopressor Requirement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kayseri City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 65 years and older.
  2. Patients scheduled for elective total hip arthroplasty.
  3. Patients with an (ASA) physical status classification of II, III, or IV.
  4. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15 who are conscious and able to cooperate.
  5. Patients with suitable peripheral arterial anatomy for PRAM monitoring.
  6. Patients who provide written to participate in the study.
  7. Patients without any clinical to spinal anesthesia. -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score \<13.
  2. Age below 65 years.
  3. History of previous major neurosurgical intervention.
  4. Anatomical abnormality, vascular defect, or infection at the site intended for arterial catheter placement for PRAM monitoring.
  5. Severe spinal deformity (e.g., severe scoliosis, previous spinal fusion surgery, or spinal trauma).
  6. Current anticoagulant therapy or coagulopathy ( >1.5 or count \<75,000/mm³).
  7. Presence of skin infection or systemic infection/sepsis.
  8. Severe hypovolemia or decompensated cardiac disease in which spinal anesthesia is .
  9. Known allergy or to local anesthetics or sedative agents.
  10. Local infection or wound at the planned spinal puncture site.
  11. Clinical contraindication to spinal anesthesia (e.g., increased intracranial pressure, septicemia, or severe hypotension). -
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
74 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia

    Patients receive unilateral spinal anesthesia and hemodynamic parameters are monitored using the PRAM method during surgery.

    Procedure: Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia

  • Experimental
    Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia

    Patients receive bilateral spinal anesthesia and hemodynamic parameters are monitored using the PRAM method during surgery.

    Procedure: Bilateral Spinal Anesthesia

Interventions

  • ProcedureUnilateral Spinal Anesthesia

    Unilateral spinal anesthesia administered for unilateral lower extremity surgery.

  • ProcedureBilateral Spinal Anesthesia

    Bilateral spinal anesthesia administered for unilateral lower extremity surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cardiac Index Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Cardiac index will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in L/min/m². Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  2. Stroke Volume Index Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Stroke volume index will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in mL/beat/m². Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  3. Stroke Volume Variation Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Stroke volume variation will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported as a percentage. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  4. Pulse Pressure Variation Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Pulse pressure variation will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported as a percentage. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  5. Systemic Vascular Resistance Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Systemic vascular resistance will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in dyn·s/cm⁵. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  6. Oxygen Delivery Index Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Oxygen delivery index will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in mL/min/m². Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  7. Arterial Elastance Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Arterial elastance will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in mmHg/mL. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  8. Maximum Rate of Arterial Pressure Rise Measured Using PRAM

    The maximum rate of arterial pressure rise (dP/dtmax) will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in mmHg/s. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  9. Cardiac Cycle Efficiency Measured Using PRAM

    Cardiac cycle efficiency (CCE) will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported as a dimensionless value. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  10. Oxygen Delivery Measured Using PRAM During Spinal Anesthesia

    Oxygen delivery (DO₂) will be measured using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) and reported in mL/min. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  11. Mean Arterial Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia

    Mean arterial pressure (MAP) will be measured using invasive arterial pressure monitoring and reported in mmHg. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  12. Heart Rate During Spinal Anesthesia

    Heart rate (HR) will be recorded using standard perioperative monitoring and reported in beats per minute. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

  13. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation During Spinal Anesthesia

    Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) will be measured using pulse oximetry and reported as a percentage. Measurements recorded at each study time point will be compared between the unilateral and bilateral spinal anesthesia groups.

    Time frame: From immediately before spinal anesthesia until completion of surgery, assessed at baseline and every 10 minutes for up to 180 minutes.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2026, 3 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 11, 2026
First posted
Aug 27, 2026
StartActual
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07789795
Lead sponsor
Kayseri City Hospital
Responsible party
Ayşe Temiz (resident physician, Kayseri City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 27, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion