ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07164235SpAlUpdated Sep 10, 2025

Spondylodiscitis: a Retrospective Observational Study.

An observational study in Spondylodiscitis, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-10.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
137
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spondylodiscitis is an infectious process affecting the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and paraspinal tissues, sometimes involving the spinal cord, most often with a bacterial etiology. Instrumental diagnosis relies on CT, however, contrast-enhanced MRI is the most sensitive test for confirming the diagnosis, as abnormalities are usually detected earlier than with CT. More recently, nuclear diagnostics using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET has proven very useful both for diagnosis and as a tool for monitoring therapeutic efficacy. Etiological diagnosis relies primarily on blood cultures and, if the former is not possible, diagnostic biopsy. Approximately one-third of patients lack a microbiological isolation, and the inability to implement targeted therapy is a known risk factor for treatment failure.

Therapeutic indications are giving way to shorter courses based on the use of oral medications, even though the epidemiology of the countries from which most of the clinical indications and literature originate is profoundly different from that of Italy. An epidemiological analysis of the cases referred to our Center is therefore of primary importance.

Read the detailed description

Spondylodiscitis is an infectious process affecting the vertebral bodies, intervertebral discs, and paraspinal tissues, sometimes involving the spinal cord. The etiology is most often bacterial, with the main pathogens implicated being Staphylococcus aureus, streptococci, enterobacteriaceae, and other Gram-negative bacilli. Instrumental diagnosis relies on CT, which allows for the detection of lesions such as bony sequestrations and soft tissue abscesses, as well as the exclusion of epidural abscesses. Contrast-enhanced MRI, however, is the most sensitive test for confirming the diagnosis, as abnormalities are usually detected earlier than with CT.

More recently, nuclear imaging, particularly 18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET, has proven very useful both for diagnosing tissue with high glucose metabolism and as a tool for monitoring therapeutic efficacy. 18F-FDG-PET/CT has been associated with greater accuracy than MRI in diagnosing early spondylodiscitis in the first 2 weeks after symptom onset. Another important advantage of 18F-FDG-PET/CT over MRI is the potential identification of metastatic infectious foci, especially in patients with bacteremia, allowing for rapid source control. 18F-FDG-PET/CT is also useful for spondylodiscitis caused by mycobacteria, fungi, or Brucella, with some data suggesting different uptake values depending on the etiology.

Etiological diagnosis, however, relies primarily on blood cultures, which can be positive in up to 50% of cases of native spondylodiscitis caused by S. aureus. When noninvasive isolation is not possible, a diagnostic biopsy is necessary. Despite the use of invasive techniques, approximately one-third of patients lack microbiological isolation, and the inability to implement targeted therapy is a known risk factor for treatment failure. It also leads to the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, with environmental and sometimes economic consequences.

Therapeutic indications, until now based on case series and cohort studies dating back more than 40 years, are giving way to shorter courses based on the use of orally administered drugs. However, the epidemiology of the countries from which most of the clinical indications and literature on bone infections originate is profoundly different from that of Italy. Therefore, an epidemiological analysis of the cases referred to our Center is of primary importance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spondylodiscitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Spondylodiscitis
  • infectious processes
  • 18-FDG
  • 18 F-FDG-PET/CT
03

In context

Discitis

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Discitis; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 137 is above the median of 104 across 16 observational studies indexed under Discitis.

Browse Discitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient will be taken from adult male or female population aged ≥ 18 years, who received diagnosis of spondylodiscitis confirmed radiologically and microbiologically and who was admitted to Infectious Diseases Unit between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2024.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult male or female subjects aged ≥ 18 years;
  • Diagnosis of spondylodiscitis confirmed radiologically and microbiologically
  • Admission to Infectious Diseases Unit between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2024
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • Lack of signed
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
137 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherPatients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis

    Patients admitted to the Infectious Diseases Department of the University Hospital of Alessandria between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2024, who were diagnosed with spondylodiscitis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Descriptive analysis

    Description of the characteristics of patients diagnosed with spondylodiscitis admitted to the University Hospital of Alessandria from 2017 to 2024

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pre- and post-pandemic comparison of clinical and management characteristics of patients with spondylodiscitis

    Comparison of the differences in the characteristics of patients hospitalized before and after 06/03/2020 (pre-pandemic and post-pandemic period)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Comparison of the differences between patients with confirmed and unconfirmed microbiological diagnosis

    Evaluate any differences in duration between patients with a confirmed and unconfirmed microbiological diagnosis of spondylodiscitis

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Concordance between PET results and antibiotic therapy

    Evaluate the concordance between PET results and antibiotic therapy discontinuation in the absence of relapse at 6 months

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinical Trial Center SC Infrastruttura Ricerca Formazione Innovazione Dipartimento Attività Integrate Ricerca e Innovazione Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS Antonio e Biagio e C. Arrigo di Alessandria
    Alessandria, Piedmont 15121, Italy
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2022 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 29 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 2, 2025
First posted
Sep 10, 2025
StartActual
Jul 5, 2022
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Sep 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07164235
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2025
Start date
Jul 5, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion