ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07272928CORSICOUpdated Dec 9, 2025

Comparison of the Resection Site Order in Simultaneous Approach of Colorectal Liver Metastasis

An observational study in Colorectal Liver Metastasis, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-09.

Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Colorectal cancer frequently presents with liver metastases, and complete removal of both primary and liver tumors can significantly improve survival. Simultaneous resection (SA) of the colon and liver is increasingly used and is considered safe when minor liver resections are performed, offering advantages such as shorter hospitalization, fewer complications, and faster chemotherapy initiation.

However, the best sequence of resection, liver-first or colon-first, remains uncertain, as each has potential benefits and drawbacks, particularly regarding anastomotic healing. Minimally invasive approaches to SA show similar outcomes to open surgery, though limited data suggest that resection order may affect blood loss.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and 15-25% of patients present with liver metastases at diagnosis. Complete resection of both the primary tumor and liver metastases can yield survival rates up to 47.9%. Simultaneous resection (SA) of the colon and liver is a potential option for patients with synchronous metastases, though traditionally considered high-risk, especially when major hepatectomies are involved.

Recent studies show that SA is safe when minor hepatectomies are paired with standard colon resections and may offer advantages such as reduced hospital stay, lower costs, fewer complications, and faster initiation of chemotherapy.

The optimal sequence of resection in SA remains unclear. Liver-first procedures may preserve sterility and address the prognostically significant lesion first but could impair bowel anastomosis healing.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including laparoscopic and robotic approaches, is increasingly used for SA and appears comparable to open surgery in terms of morbidity, mortality, and oncologic outcomes. Early data on MIS suggest that resection order may influence intraoperative blood loss, but findings remain inconsistent and require further investigation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

4,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 886 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 136 across 557 observational studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria is the lead sponsor of 37 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of colorectal cancer and liver metastases using open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery between 2015 and 2023 in participating centers

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer with synchronous liver during the reference period, who underwent simultaneous resection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Simultaneous emergency resection due to symptoms of the primary tumor.
  • Presence of extrahepatic disease confirmed at the time of resection or diagnosis.
  • High surgical risk defined as an score greater than 3.
  • At least 10 cases performed by the invited center during the study period.
  • Incomplete data or follow-up of less than 6 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • ProcedureData collection

    Data collection to assess whether the order of resection of the site in a simultaneous approach (liver first vs. colon first) in colorectal cancer with liver metastases affects overall postoperative morbidity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in overall morbidity rates

    Measurement of the difference in overall morbidity rates between both approaches (liver first vs. colon first) in colorectal cancer with liver metastasis influences postoperative

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Evaluation of the postoperative mortality for both approaches, (liver first vs. colon first), when performed via laparoscopic or robotic surgery

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Overall survival

    Compare the overall survival of patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between both approaches (liver first vs. colon first), when performed via laparoscopic or robotic surgery

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Disease-free survival

    Compare the disease-free survival of patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between both approaches (liver first vs. colon first), when performed via laparoscopic or robotic surgery

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Recurrence sites

    Compare the recurrence sites in patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between both approaches (liver first vs. colon first), when performed via laparoscopic or robotic surgery

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Morbidity

    Compare the morbidity in patients with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between both approaches (liver first vs. colon first), when performed via laparoscopic or robotic surgery

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07272928
Lead sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo di Alessandria
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 9, 2025
Start date
Feb 27, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 27, 2025
Completion
Aug 27, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 9, 2025

Study contacts

Clinical Trial Center
Contact
clinicaltrialcenter@ospedale.al.it
0131206893

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion