ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07163078Updated Sep 21, 2026

Nutrition Supplement for Cystic Fibrosis

An interventional study of Common form supplementation and Uncommon nutrient supplementation in Cystic Fibrosis (CF), sponsored by Ohio State University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 717 studies in Cystic Fibrosis with a site in United States — 86 open to participants now, 111 under way, 8 of them phase 3. Cystic Fibrosis · United States.

Planned enrollment
183rd of 517
60 · median 36
Started
2026
with 15 others
No phase
155 of 717
18 open now
Primary completion
2027-02
later than 42 of 108 live
Registered
697th of 717
by date

Among the 717 studies in Cystic Fibrosis with a site in United States, this one is the 183rd largest by planned enrollment of the 517 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 16 that started in 2026, is one of 155 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 42 of the 108 other live ones, and was the 697th registered.

Cystic Fibrosis

1,621 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 201 are open to participants now.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Open to participants now

86 of the 717 studies in Cystic Fibrosis with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

81 more — sign in →

All 86 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 156 Cystic Fibrosis studies recruiting now, 95 (61%) set no upper age limit and 45 (29%) stop at 75 or younger; 86 take children under 18; 41 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 50 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 717 studies in Cystic Fibrosis with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this study is to learn if one nutrition supplement formula works better than a different formula in adults with cystic fibrosis. The main question being addressed is: Will certain atypical versions of certain nutrients outperform typical versions of these nutrients? This will be determined by examining blood measures of nutrient levels and/or indications of nutrient function indicators pre- and post-intervention. Participants will take the supplements for 6 weeks with a blood draw before and after that time.

Read the detailed description

Background. For people with cystic fibrosis (CF), new drugs have extended life expectancy and improved quality of life. Yet, even with these improvements, people with CF still face shorter than normal life spans and constant threats of quality of life disruptions. One approach to attacking these hardships consists of treating nutritional deficiencies. However, that's not as simple as just giving standard nutrients. People with CF have trouble transporting certain nutrients from the digestive system. In theory, giving nutrients in certain forms might get past the CF associated difficulties. However, the big question is: What forms would work?

The answer to this question can vary for different nutrients. For fat soluble vitamins D and E as well as coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), which is vitamin-like in CF, the proposed solution may be to make the nutrients mix well with water (by using something called micellular versions). That's because these nutrients normally leave the digestive system into the blood by riding with ingested fats; that's a problem in CF because fat malabsorption occurs. Micellular forms could allow the nutrient to travel with water. Some micellular versions of fat soluble vitamins have been tested in people with CF, but the results were not ideal. A better approach could be to use nanoemulsion micellular versions of fat soluble nutrients.

For another nutrient, copper, there needs to not only be good absorption from the digestive system, but also a need to get the copper's to its functional molecules. This principal investigator for the current study has found that giving the normally well absorbed copper glycinate doesn't improve copper status in CF people. In contrast, this situation may be remedied by mixing copper glycinate with a well absorbed version of the nonessential nutrient curcumin (which could escort copper to the appropriate molecules).

Choline, an essential nutrient, can also be a concern for people with CF. Alpha-glyceryl phosphoryl (AGP)-choline may absorb better in these people than the more commonly used choline tartrate.

If the above mentioned non-standard nutrient forms can be shown to work better in people with CF, a new product could be made with the non-standard versions of vitamins D and E, CoQ10, copper, and choline. A formulation could also eventually include another 2 fat soluble vitamins as nanoemulsions as well as zinc + curcumin (since zinc may have the same problem-solution as copper). The product could also include other nutrients normally taken as part of a multi-nutrient supplement.

None of the hand picked versions of the nutrients noted above have been tested in CF people. Therefore, a new study will be done to test these versions for vitamins D and E, CoQ10, copper, and choline.

Hypothesis. This project seeks confirmation of this hypothesis: a formulation with non-standard nutrient versions can outperform conventional nutrients in people with CF. Positive results here can bring a product close to launch. However, one more short study in more people in another geographic location can add more launch justification. A new study can also test the utility of adding 3 nutrients that should work better in versions like those tested in the current project.

Methods. A 6 week intervention is to be used. This principal investigator has used this length in many supplement studies and found it sufficient for altering nutritional function status. For example, this principal investigator has shown a strong change in copper status after 6 weeks of supplementation. Others have seen the same thing for 6 weeks or less for studies on vitamin E.

The new study will be double blind with subjects not knowing whether they are getting the novel or standard nutrient forms. The 2 formulas being tested are as follows:

Supplement 1 Conventional Vitamin D/Vitamin E/Coenzyme Q10. Copper glycinate. Choline tartrate

Supplement 2 Nanoemulsion Vitamin D/ Vitamin E/Coenzyme Q10. Copper glycinate + curcumin. AGP Choline

Daily doses for both supplements 1500 IU Vitamin D3 200; IU Vitamin E; 100 mg Coenzyme Q10; 2.5 mg; 250 mg Choline

Endpoints will be blood assessments for the status of the various nutrients. Some other blood measures will be done that relate to some of the functional implications of improving the status of the nutrients under study.

03

Conditions studied

  • Cystic Fibrosis (CF)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Vitamins
  • Copper
  • Choline
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cystic fibrosis
  • Diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
  • 18 years old or older
  • Currently on modulator
  • Normal liver enzyme labs

Exclusion Criteria: :

  • Non-English-speaking participants
  • Acute health crisis
  • Persistent elevation of liver enzymes >6 months (E2) ( >80 U/L)
  • History of liver abnormalities
  • If patients are currently taking Category A or Category B in the LiverTox categorization system
  • Recent vitamin D supplementation of 30 mcg/day or higher, vitamin E supplements of 200 IU/day or higher, or copper at 2 mg/day or higher
  • Any other concern by investigator that the subject is inappropriate for inclusion
  • Patients who is on a reduced dose of a CFTR modulator
  • Patients on azole antifungals (voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconzole, >7 days of fluconazole, etc.).
  • Patients who binge drink EtOH - for men more than 2 drinks/day, for women more than 1 drink/ day
  • Patients that are on other medications that are sensitive substrates - such as tacrolimus for example
  • Patients on sensitive CYP3A4 substrates including but not limited to tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Conventional nutrient forms

    People are given a supplement with nutrient forms typically used in supplements

    Dietary Supplement: Common form supplementation

  • Experimental
    Non-common nutrient forms

    People are given a supplement with nutrient forms that are not the most commonly used forms in supplements

    Dietary Supplement: Uncommon nutrient supplementation

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementCommon form supplementation

    The intervention product would represent part of a typical supplement given to people including those with CF

  • Dietary supplementUncommon nutrient supplementation

    The intervention product would represent part of a possible new supplement given to people including those with CF

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Nutrient status assessor 1

    Plasma concentrations of 25-OH vitamin D (ng/ml)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  2. Nutrition status assessor 2

    Plasma concentrations of vitamin E (mg/L)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  3. Nutrition status assessor 3

    Plasma concentrations of CoQ10 (mg/L)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  4. Nutrition status assessor 4

    Plasma copper (µg/ml)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  5. Nutrition status assessor 5

    Plasma diamine oxidase activity (Units/L)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  6. Nutrition status assessor 6

    Erythrocyte copper superoxide dismutase activities (Units/ml packed cells)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  7. Nutrition status assessor 7

    Plasma choline (µM)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional implication indicator 1

    Plasma glucose(mg/dL)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  2. Functional implication indicator 2

    Plasma oxidized LDL (ng/ml)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  3. Functional implication indicator 3

    Plasma alanine amino transferase (ALT)(Units/L)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  4. Functional implication indicator 4

    Plasma vitamin C-like reducing power (mg ascorbic acid equivalents/dL)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

  5. Subjective response

    Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R): 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating better quality of life)

    Time frame: From pre-supplementation to 6 weeks later

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital-Ohio State University
    Columbus, Ohio 43016, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Best K, McCoy K, Gemma S, Disilvestro RA. Copper enzyme activities in cystic fibrosis before and after copper supplementation plus or minus zinc. Metabolism. 2004 Jan;53(1):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2003.07.017. PubMed 14681839 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Confidentiality issues exist even if shared without identifiers

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Feb 2027, 3 months later.

Of 214 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cystic Fibrosis, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 229 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 25, 2025
First posted
Sep 9, 2025
StartEst.
Oct 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2, 2027
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07163078
Responsible party
Robert DiSilvestro (Emeritus Pofessor, Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2025
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Stephanie Clinical Research Program Coordinato
Contact
Stephanie.Sliemers@nationwidechildrens.org
614-722-2000
Robert A Emeritus Professor
principal investigator · Ohio State University
Karen Faculty Pulmonary Medicine Nationwide Children's Hospital
study director · Nationwide Children's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion