An interventional study of Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training and clinical pathway in Cardiovascular Disease Acute, Emergency Department Patient and Heart Failure Acute, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-03.
Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The aim of this study is to assess emergency medicine physician and advanced practice provider (APP) knowledge and technical skill in performance of a point-of-care ultrasound simulation and just-in-time training pathway to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ultrasound training program. By performing this study, we hope to create a standardized training model which could potentially facilitate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical performance and thereby improve patient care.
832 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 171 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 75 is below the median of 174 across 429 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.
Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.
Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Advanced Practice Providers (APPs) are nonphysicians essential to the emergency department workforce, especially in rural and community hospitals.
Behavioral: Cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) training and clinical pathway
Participants will complete a cardiac POCUS simulation session and a hands-on observed structured clinical skill exam (OSCE) post-training led by ultrasound-trained faculty. Then as part of standard clinical care, advanced practice providers (APPs) will perform POCUS while supervised by emergency medicine (EM) attending physicians. To assess program feasibility and acceptability, participants will complete a pre/post and 6-month post-survey and semi-structured interview, as well as a knowledge and technical skills assessment.
Aim 1: Assess the feasibility of implementing a just-in-time cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical training pathway for advanced practice providers (APPs) using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
Participants will complete a cardiac POCUS simulation session and a hands-on structured clinical skill exam post-training (OSCE) led by ultrasound-trained faculty. Then as part of standard clinical care, APPs will perform POCUS while supervised by EM attending physicians. The primary outcome assesses program feasibility and acceptability. Participants will complete a pre/post and 6-month post-survey and semi-structured interview. Survey questions are structured based on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool. This is scored on a Likert scale from 1-5.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Acceptability of the Intervention as measured by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The AIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater acceptability.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Appropriateness of the Intervention as measured by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
The IAM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Feasibility of the Intervention as measured by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) survey tool
The FIM is scored on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, where a higher score indicates greater appropriateness.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 1: Feasibility of implementing a just-in-time cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical training pathway for advanced practice providers (APPs) using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.
Using a modified framework analysis approach, a team of 3-4 trained research assistants and the two emergency ultrasound fellows led by an implementation science expert will deductively analyze semi-structured interview content based on RE-AIM constructs with open inductive coding for data that does not fit into the framework. The investigators will perform a preliminary rapid qualitative deductive analysis based on audio recordings and meeting notes applied to the RE-AIM dimensions, to determine scope and saturation. Coding and categorization will be conducted with RE-AIM templated coding sheets and transferred to NVivo.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Educational impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance
Participants will complete a pre-, post-, and 6-month post-training knowledge assessment and technical skill test to assess the educational impact of the cardiac POCUS program, structured using the Ultrasound Competency Assessment Tool (UCAT), which is scored on a Likert scale from 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater competency.
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - number of clinical POCUSs performed
To assess the advanced practice provider (APP) training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on the number of clinical POCUS performed in the emergency department pre/post-intervention (from the Butterfly ultrasound archiving system, units in counts/percentages).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - image quality
To assess APP training program effectiveness, the investigators will collect pre/post-health record data on image quality review scores (determine by two ultrasound experts, Likert scale 1-5, where a higher score indicates greater quality).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - diagnostic accuracy
The investigators will collect data on diagnostic accuracy as compared to radiology studies (from ultrasound expert review, True Positive, True Negative, False Positive, False Negative, or Technically-limited study)
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - time to initial cardiology consult
The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention time to initial cardiology consult (both from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Clinical impact of the training model on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and diagnostic performance - emergency department length-of-stay
The investigators will collect electronic health record data on pre/post-intervention ED length-of-stay (from the Epic electronic health record, units in hours).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Aim 2: Impact of the training model on cost-effectiveness
The investigators will collect pre/post-intervention POCUS revenue data for cost-effectiveness (from hospital billing data, units in dollars).
Time frame: 1-2 years for each study site
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.