CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07153718Updated Sep 4, 2025

Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent AF With HF

An interventional study of Electrogram-guided ablation and Anatomical-guided Ablation in Heart Failure and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Xu Liu. Active, not recruiting at 10 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-04.

Sponsored by Xu Liu · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Aug 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality. We conducted this multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis, with one-year all-cause mortality rates approaching 34% and substantially elevated risks of stroke and rehospitalization. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, as evidenced by numerous pivotal studies, such as CASTLE-AF. It is well recognized that the majority of patients with HF and AF exhibit persistent AF; however, the underlying mechanisms responsible for sustaining persistent AF in this population remain to be fully elucidated. Thus, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is therefore critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality.

Building on prior research, we have identified driver regions as critical determinants in the maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation. Moreover, our randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that electro-anatomical ablation may represent the optimal strategy for persistent AF. Based on these findings, we conducted a multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation with heart failure
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 300 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Xu Liu is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All inclusion criteria must be met to be included in the study.

    1. Age: Patients aged 18-80 years, with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), regardless of ejection fraction (EF).
    2. Diagnosis of Heart Failure:

      Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): LVEF ≤ 40%. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): LVEF > 40%, including HFmrEF (LVEF 41-50%).

    3. Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Patients with symptomatic persistent AF who have failed or are intolerant to at least one antiarrhythmic drug.
    4. NYHA Class II-III: Patients with heart failure classified as NYHA class II-III, who are symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Informed Consent: Able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study.
    5. Guideline-Recommended Pharmacologic Therapy: Patients who have received and are currently on guideline-recommended pharmacologic therapy for heart failure, including but not limited to ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following criteria shall be excluded.

    1. End-Stage Heart Failure: Patients with heart failure classified as NYHA class IV or with LVEF ≤ 20%.
    2. Severe Comorbidities:
    3. Patients with severe pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD, severe restrictive lung disease).
    4. Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73m²) or advanced liver disease.
    5. Active malignancy or other terminal illnesses with a prognosis of less than one year.
    6. Inability to Tolerate Ablation:

    <!-- -->

    1. Patients unable to undergo catheter ablation due to anatomical or procedural issues.
    2. Patients with contraindications to the procedure, including allergy to contrast agents or inability to tolerate anesthesia.
    3. Left atrial thrombus confirmed by preoperative esophageal ultrasound; 7. Uncontrolled Arrhythmias: Patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm despite optimal medical therapy or require frequent hospitalization for arrhythmia control.

    8. Pregnancy: Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 9. Contraindications to Anticoagulation: 10. Patients who are contraindicated for anticoagulation therapy (e.g., history of major bleeding or bleeding diathesis).

    11. History of Severe Valve Disease: Patients with a history of severe valve disease and/or prosthetic valve replacement.

    12. Recent Myocardial Infarction or Stroke: Patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 3 months.

    13. Contrast Agent Allergy: Patients with a known allergy to contrast agents. 14. Contraindications for Cardiac Catheterization: Any contraindications for cardiac catheterization, including inability to safely perform the procedure.

    15. Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Patients who have previously undergone atrial fibrillation ablation.

    16. Cardiac Surgery: Patients who have undergone any cardiac surgery within the last 2 months.

    17. Life Expectancy: Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Anatomical-guided Ablation Group

    Patients in the ANAT group would receive anatomical-guided ablation after PVI, including linear ablation and Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion.

    Procedure: Anatomical-guided Ablation

  • Active comparator
    Electrogram-guided Ablation Group

    Patients in the EGM group received target electrogram ablation after PVI while did not receive anatomical-guided ablation. We defined the target electrograms into 4 types as follows.(1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity (3) High-Frequency Potentials (4) Focal Activity

    Procedure: Electrogram-guided ablation

  • Experimental
    Extensive Electrogram-Anatomical Guided Ablation Group

    Patients in the extensive ablation group (EXT group) would receive EGM-guided ablation firstly. The anatomical-guided ablation would be performed after EGM-guided ablation no matter whether AF terminated during EGM-guided ablation.

    Procedure: Extensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation

Interventions

  • ProcedureElectrogram-guided ablation

    pulmonary vein ioslation; target electrograms ablation, including (1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation, (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity, (3) High-Frequency Potentials, (4) Focal Activity.

  • ProcedureAnatomical-guided Ablation

    pulmonary vein isolation; LA roof, posterior inferior wall and mitral isthmus linear lesion; Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion.

  • ProcedureExtensive electrogram-anatomical guided ablation

    pulmonary vein isolation; target electrogram ablation; linear ablation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits

    The primary endpoint was the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits due to worsening heart failure during the follow-up period after a single catheter ablation procedure

    Time frame: 12, 18, 24, 36, 46, 60months

  2. freedom from any documented AF/AT

    freedom from any documented AF/AT episode lasting more than 30 seconds after the blanking period without anti-arrhythmic drug treatment

    Time frame: 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60months

Secondary outcomes

  1. AF burden <1%

    AF burden \<1% after a single ablation procedure, as measured by Holter monitoring or device-recorded data (Patients who remained in persistent AF throughout follow-up were assigned AF burden=100%. Both ends of the distribution (burden=0% and burden=100%) were included in statistical analysis.).

    Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure

  2. Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class

    Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class by at least one grade

    Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure

  3. Change in 6-minute walk test

    Change in 6-minute walk test from baseline to Month 3, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure

    Time frame: 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure

  4. Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)

    Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to Month 3,12, 24, 36, 48, 60 after a single procedure

    Time frame: Month 3,12, 24, 36, 48, 60 after a single procedure

  5. Incidence of procedure-related complications

    Incidence of procedure-related complications, including but not limited to: vascular complications (e.g., hematoma, pseudoaneurysm), cardiac tamponade, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), phrenic nerve injury, atrioesophageal fistula, procedure-related death within 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days after a single procedure

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital
    Anqing, Anhui 246000, China
  • The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei 430014, China
  • Changshu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    Changshu, Jiangsu 215516, China
  • Xuzhou Central Hospital
    Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221009, China
  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    Jinan, Shandong 250000, China
  • Jinan City People's Hospital
    Jinan, Shandong 271100, China
  • Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University
    Jining, Shandong 272000, China
  • Yuhuan Second People's Hospital
    Yuhuan, Zhejiang 317600, China
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital
    Shanghai, 200030, China
  • Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    Shanghai, 200127, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li K, Wang X, Qin M, Ye P, Han B, Jiang W, Zhang Y, Zheng Q, Ji A, Zhang M, Wang Y, Wu S, Xu K, Xu C, Liu X, Hou X. Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Heart Failure: Three-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2026 Apr;19(4):e014394. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.125.014394. Epub 2026 Mar 31. PubMed 41914182 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The individual participant data (IPD) from this study will not be shared publicly due to concerns regarding patient confidentiality and the sensitive nature of medical data. Given the potential risks of identifying participants from detailed clinical information, the data will remain confidential and will not be made available for public sharing. Additionally, the study involves proprietary methodologies and ongoing analyses that are part of the intellectual property of the institution. As such, sharing the IPD at this stage could compromise the integrity of the study's findings and its future applications.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07153718
Lead sponsor
Xu Liu
Responsible party
Xu Liu (Dr, Shanghai Chest Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 4, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion