An interventional study of Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF, 38%) and Sodium Fluoride Varnish (NaF, 5%) and Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF, 38%) in Dental Caries, sponsored by Beaty Dent. Completed at 2 sites in Albania. Open to participants aged 18 Months to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-03.
Sponsored by Beaty Dent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Tooth decay (dental caries) occurs when acids dissolve tooth structure. If not treated, cavities in primary teeth can progress quickly, leading to caries, infection and early tooth loss. These problems may affect chewing, speech, nutrition, and overall health. In Albania and many other countries, cavities in young children are very common. Standard dental treatments are often difficult in very young or uncooperative children and may require sedation or general anesthesia.
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is a liquid medication that can be painted directly onto cavities. SDF stops cavities from worsening by killing bacteria and hardening softened tooth surfaces. The main side effect is dark staining of the treated area. Despite this, SDF is considered safe and effective, especially for children who cannot tolerate conventional treatment. Fluoride varnish (FV) is another preventive treatment applied to all tooth surfaces to strengthen enamel and help prevent new cavities.
The purpose of this study is to compare two approaches for managing tooth decay in young children who have difficulty cooperating for dental care:
The children were followed for 24 months. The main outcome measured is whether cavities became arrested, meaning the surface became hard and inactive with no further breakdown. Additional outcomes include whether combining SDF with FV provides added benefit and whether baseline factors such as oral hygiene and diet influence treatment success.
The information from this study may help dentists and parents understand how SDF, with or without FV, can be used as a safe, effective, and child-friendly option to manage cavities in young children.
Dental caries is a biofilm-mediated disease driven by dietary sugars and bacterial acid production. The prevalence in primary dentition is high worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Conventional restorative treatments are difficult to perform in very young or behaviorally uncooperative children, and may require sedation or general anesthesia. Therefore, minimally invasive methods such as silver diamine fluoride (SDF) have gained importance as a practical option for arresting active caries lesions.
Rationale and Objectives SDF (38%) is a topical solution with antimicrobial and remineralizing properties that has been shown to arrest dentin caries in children. A limitation is that it stains carious surfaces black. Fluoride varnish (5% NaF) is widely used as a preventive agent to reduce new caries formation. Combining the two may offer dual benefits: SDF for arresting existing lesions and varnish for preventing new ones. The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of two protocols-SDF alone versus alternating SDF and fluoride varnish-for arresting dentin caries in uncooperative young children with primary teeth.
Study Design This was a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in a pediatric dental setting. A total of 104 children aged 1.5-8 years with at least one active dentin caries lesion in primary teeth were enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Children with systemic conditions contraindicating participation were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians, and the protocol was approved by the national ethics committee.
Interventions
Group 1 (SDF only): Lesions received 38% SDF application every 6 months.
Group 2 (SDF + FV): Lesions received 38% SDF application every 6 months, with 5% NaF varnish applied to all teeth every 3 months.
All treatments were delivered by calibrated operators according to standardized protocols. Oral hygiene and dietary advice were given to caregivers.
Outcome Measures
Primary outcome: Caries arrest at 24 months, defined as hardening of the lesion surface with no further progression, assessed visually and tactually by blinded examiners.
Secondary outcomes:
Comparative efficacy between the two protocols
Incidence of new caries in non-treated teeth
Influence of baseline factors (oral hygiene, sugar intake, socioeconomic status) on treatment outcomes
Adverse effects, including pulp symptoms and parental acceptance of staining
Follow-up and Data Collection Clinical examinations were performed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Standardized diagnostic criteria were used. Lesion depth and activity were recorded, and intra-examiner reliability was periodically tested. Caregivers were interviewed about oral health behaviors. Data were entered into an electronic database with quality control checks.
Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics. Caries arrest rates were compared between groups using mixed-effects logistic regression to account for clustering of multiple surfaces within each child. Effect modification by baseline covariates (oral hygiene, sugar intake, socioeconomic status, lesion depth) was tested through interaction terms. Statistical significance was set at p \< 0.05. Analyses were performed using Stata software.
Safety and Monitoring SDF and fluoride varnish are approved topical agents for dental use and have well-established safety profiles. Adverse events were monitored and reported. No independent Data Monitoring Committee was appointed given the minimal risk nature of the interventions.
Expected Impact This trial provides comparative evidence on two practical, non-invasive caries management protocols in uncooperative pediatric patients. The findings may inform public health strategies and clinical guidelines for the management of early childhood caries in similar populations.
1,171 studies on the registry are indexed under Dental Caries; 209 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 60 across 967 interventional studies indexed under Dental Caries.
Browse Dental Caries studies →This is the only study on the registry with Beaty Dent as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Children aged 1.5 to 8 years
Uncooperative to dental procedures (Frankl Behavior Rating 1 or 2)
Presence of at least one active, cavitated carious lesion in primary teeth, without pulp involvement
Eligible primary teeth: active caries without pulp involvement
Exclusion Criteria:
Children with clinical signs of infection (pain, parulis, fistula, or abscess)
Cooperative to dental procedures
Children who are candidates for conscious sedation
Known allergy to silver, fluoride, or ammonia
Teeth with pulpal complications, non-restorable, exfoliating, or scheduled for extraction
Participants assigned to this arm receive topical application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to all active carious lesions at baseline and every 6 months (months 0, 6, 12, and 18, 24). In addition, a 5% sodium fluoride varnish (NaF) is applied to all teeth at 3-month intervals (months 3, 9, 15, 21). Applications are performed by a dentist using standard microbrush or applicator techniques, ensuring lesions coverage for SDF and full dentition coverage for NaF varnish. This alternating protocol evaluates whether combining periodic SDF with regular fluoride varnish enhances caries arrest in primary teeth compared to semiannual SDF alone.
Drug: Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF, 38%) and Sodium Fluoride Varnish (NaF, 5%) · Drug: Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF, 38%)
Participants assigned to this arm receive topical application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to all active carious lesions at baseline and every 6 months (months 0, 6, 12, and 18, 24). Applications are performed by a dentist using a microbrush to directly cover the lesion surface until fully saturated. No additional fluoride varnish is provided in this arm. The protocol evaluates the effectiveness of semiannual SDF application alone for arresting active caries in primary teeth of young, uncooperative pediatric patients.
Drug: Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF, 38%) and Sodium Fluoride Varnish (NaF, 5%)
Application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to all active carious lesions at baseline and every 6 months (months 0, 6, 12, and 18, 24). In addition, a 5% sodium fluoride varnish (NaF) is applied to all teeth at 3-month intervals (months 3, 9, 15, 21). Applications are performed by a dentist using standard microbrush or applicator techniques, ensuring lesions coverage for SDF and full dentition coverage for NaF varnish. This alternating protocol evaluates whether combining periodic SDF with regular fluoride varnish enhances caries arrest in primary teeth compared to semiannual SDF alone.
Also known as: Saforide (Toyo Seiyaku Kasei, Japan), Advantage Arrest (Elevate Oral Care, USA), Riva Star (SDI, Australia), 3M™ Fast Release Varnish, Duraphat (Colgate), CavityShield (3M), Flor-Opal (Ultradent)
Application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) to all active carious lesions at baseline and every 6 months (months 0, 6, 12, and 18, 24). Applications are performed by a dentist using a microbrush to directly cover the lesion surface until fully saturated. No additional fluoride varnish is provided in this arm. The protocol evaluates the effectiveness of semiannual SDF application alone for arresting active caries in primary teeth of young, uncooperative pediatric patients.
Also known as: Saforide (Toyo Seiyaku Kasei Co., Japan), Advantage Arrest (Elevate Oral Care, USA), Riva Star (SDI Limited, Australia) 3M™ Fast Release Varnish, Duraphat (Colgate-Palmolive), CavityShield
Caries arrest rate of treated lesions
Proportion of active carious lesions that transition to a hardened, non-progressive state (surface hardness on probing, dark discoloration, no cavitation/enlargement), assessed by visual-tactile examination using ICDAS-based criteria under proper lighting and dry conditions. Evaluations conducted by blinded assessors.
Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment
Progression of treated lesions to advanced caries or pulpal complications
Proportion of treated surfaces exhibiting progression defined as softened dentin upon probing or development of pulpal complications (pain, parulis/fistula, tenderness to percussion). Lesions meeting failure criteria are withdrawn from arrest analysis and managed according to standard protocols.
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-treatment
Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study involves pediatric patients, where data protection and confidentiality are paramount. Only aggregate results will be reported in publications.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Silver diamine fluoride