ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07151300BEE-KNEEUpdated Aug 4, 2026

Phonophoresis With Bee Venom: Evaluating Its Efficacy in Managing Pain and Enhancing Mobility in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

An interventional study of Ultrasound therapy unit and Bee venom topical preparation (for phonophoresis) in Knee Osteoarthritis and Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Sinai University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-04.

Sponsored by Sinai University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary:

This single-blind, randomized controlled trial will investigate the efficacy of bee venom phonophoresis in managing pain and improving mobility in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Thirty adults aged 40-75 years with clinically and radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis will be randomly assigned to receive either bee venom phonophoresis or placebo phonophoresis with a neutral gel. Ultrasound parameters will be standardized for all participants.

Primary outcomes are pain reduction, measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional mobility, assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The secondary outcome is walking endurance, measured by the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Assessments will be conducted at baseline and post-intervention.

The study is designed to determine whether bee venom phonophoresis offers greater clinical benefit compared to placebo phonophoresis, potentially providing a non-invasive, adjunctive treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. Ethical approval has been obtained from the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Sinai University, and all participants will provide written informed consent.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description:

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic, degenerative joint disease characterized by cartilage loss, joint space narrowing, pain, stiffness, and functional impairment. It is a leading cause of disability worldwide, particularly among older adults. Conventional management includes pharmacologic interventions such as oral analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and non-pharmacologic approaches such as exercise therapy and physiotherapy. However, these treatments may not provide adequate symptom relief and can be associated with side effects, prompting the search for alternative or adjunctive therapies.

Phonophoresis, an ultrasound-based technique that enhances transdermal drug delivery, has been investigated as a non-invasive intervention for musculoskeletal pain management. Bee venom, used in traditional medicine for inflammatory and arthritic conditions, possesses anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and immunomodulatory properties. Combining bee venom with phonophoresis may enhance penetration into periarticular tissues, potentially improving clinical outcomes in OA patients.

This single-blind, randomized controlled trial will enroll 30 adults aged 40-75 years with clinically and radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups:

Experimental group: Bee venom phonophoresis using standardized ultrasound parameters (frequency, intensity, duration).

Control group: Placebo phonophoresis using identical ultrasound settings but with a neutral gel lacking bee venom.

Primary outcomes include pain reduction assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and functional mobility assessed by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The secondary outcome is walking endurance, measured by the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline and after the intervention period.

Data will be analyzed using appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics, with between-group comparisons conducted using independent t-tests or nonparametric equivalents, and within-group comparisons using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Statistical significance will be set at p \< 0.05.

Ethical approval has been obtained from the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Sinai University. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrollment. The trial will adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP guidelines to ensure participant safety, data integrity, and scientific validity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 623 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 68 across 2,714 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Sinai University is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40-75 years
  • Clinically and radiographically confirmed knee osteoarthritis
  • Moderate to severe pain (VAS ≥ 4)
  • Willingness to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to bee products or topical agents used in the study
  • Knee surgery or trauma in the past year
  • Intra-articular injection in the past 6 months
  • Other musculoskeletal or systemic conditions affecting the knees (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Pregnancy or to ultrasound therapy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bee Venom Phonophoresis

    Participants receive bee venom phonophoresis therapy applied to the affected knee(s) using standardized ultrasound parameters. Bee venom topical preparation will be mixed with ultrasound coupling gel and applied to the treatment area. Ultrasound will be delivered at a standardized frequency, intensity, and duration determined before study commencement.

    Device: Ultrasound therapy unit · Biological: Bee venom topical preparation (for phonophoresis)

  • Placebo comparator
    Control - Placebo Phonophoresis

    Participants receive placebo phonophoresis using the same ultrasound parameters as the experimental group, but with a neutral coupling gel that does not contain bee venom. This ensures the same patient experience without the active bee venom component.

    Device: Ultrasound therapy unit

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound therapy unit

    Ultrasound therapy unit

  • BiologicalBee venom topical preparation (for phonophoresis)

    Bee venom topical preparation (for phonophoresis)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity

    Measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0), mid-intervention (week 2), and end of intervention (week 4).

  2. Change in Functional Mobility

    Measured using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, which records the time (in seconds) taken for a participant to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return, and sit down. Lower times indicate better mobility.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0), mid-intervention (week 2), and end of intervention (week 4).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Walking Endurance

    Measured using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), recording the total distance (in meters) walked in six minutes on a flat surface. Greater distances indicate improved endurance.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 0), mid-intervention (week 2), and end of intervention (week 4).

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07151300
Lead sponsor
Sinai University
Responsible party
Amany Gomaa Atiaa (lecturer, Sinai University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 3, 2025
Start date
Aug 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 25, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 25, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 4, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion