An observational study in Social Skills and Primary Care, sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-28.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand · Observational
Context: psychosocial competencies (CPS) are higher cognitive functions defined by the ability to interact with others by adopting appropriate and positive behavior. They are defined among three axes: emotional skills, cognitive skills and social skills. Dysfunctions in social skills in adults are linked to substance use and abuse, sensitivity to pain, control of violence, and being a victim of violence. The links are bidirectional: both causes and consequences.
Objectives: Compare the level of psychosocial skills in patients presenting with a use disorder or chronic pain or being victims or perpetrators of domestic violence or patients followed in a primary care center without any of these histories, using the score obtained after passing a scale currently being validated in an adult population.
Secondary objectives Describe profiles of social skills dysfunction within each population Evaluate the link between alterations in CPS in the different populations and different sociodemographic, intrinsic or environmental criteria
Type of study: multicenter comparative cross-sectional study
Number of centers: twelve (6 multi-professional primary care health centers - 6 hospital centers)
Study description: Cross-sectional, multicenter study. The patients will be included consecutively over a one-year period at the time of their visit to the inclusion center.
Primary endpoint: score obtained for each of the 4 axes on the ad hoc psychosocial skills assessment test.
Number of subjects: 600 patients (60 in each group)
Inclusion criteria
Study procedure: each participant, regardless of population, will receive a single 45-minute interview consisting of a validated psychosocial skills assessment test, and a record of consumption status and medico-socio-economic history.
Data will be collected directly online, and the main analysis will be based on a comparative analysis of the level of social skills between the different groups for each of the four axes of the social skills assessment test.
Context: psychosocial competencies (CPS) are higher cognitive functions defined by the ability to interact with others by adopting appropriate and positive behavior. They are defined among three axes: emotional skills, cognitive skills and social skills.
Social skills provide the conditions for modulating and controlling emotions, improving individual and social skills, making appropriate decisions, and resisting social conflicts. Poor social skills are linked to psychological disorders and psychiatric disorders such as mood disorders. Dysfunctions in social skills in adults are linked to substance use and abuse, sensitivity to pain, control of violence, and being a victim of violence. The links are bidirectional: both causes and consequences.
I
Objectives:
Main objective Compare the level of psychosocial skills in patients presenting with a use disorder or chronic pain or being victims or perpetrators of domestic violence or patients followed in a primary care center without any of these histories, using the score obtained after passing a scale currently being validated in an adult population,
Secondary objectives Describe profiles of social skills dysfunction within each population Evaluate the link between alterations in CPS in the different populations and different sociodemographic (gender, age, geographical area), intrinsic (executive functions) or environmental criteria (childhood trauma, precariousness...).
Type of study: multicenter comparative cross-sectional study
Number of centers: twelve (6 multi-professional primary care health centers - 6 hospital centers)
Study description: This is a cross-sectional, multicenter study in the RIPH 2 category. The patients will be included consecutively over a one-year period at the time of their visit to the emergency department. This is an interventional study in that a questionnaire will be administered, asking questions about sensitive data. There will be no follow-up.
Primary endpoint: score obtained for each of the four axes on the ad hoc psychosocial skills assessment test.
Number of subjects: 600 patients (60 in each group)
Inclusion criteria
Non inclusion criteria Patients not fluent in French, Patients with an unstabilized psychiatric disorder, Patients refusing to participate in the study. Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme, Subjects participating in another interventional research study with an exclusion period still in progress at the time of inclusion.
Patients deprived of liberty, under guardianship, curators or safeguard of justice.
Pregnant and breast-feeding women
Study procedure: each participant, regardless of population, will receive a single 45-minute interview consisting of a validated psychosocial skills assessment test, and a record of consumption status and medico-socio-economic history.
Data will be collected directly online, and the main analysis will be based on a comparative analysis of the level of social skills between the different groups for each of the four axes of the social skills assessment test.
33 studies on the registry are indexed under Social Skills; 15 are open to participants now.
Browse Social Skills studies →University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand is the lead sponsor of 841 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All eligible patients attending participating primary care centers during the study period
All eligible patients consulting in the pain center of Clermont-Ferrand and Lyon, at the addiction center of Grenoble and Clermont-Ferrand, at the center for the care of perpetrators and victims of violence in Clermont-Ferrand during the study period
Patients aged 18 and over Suicidal: Patients at risk of suicide, or Suicidal : Patients who have attempted suicide, or Primary care patients
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients not fluent in French, Patients with an unstabilized psychiatric disorder, Patients refusing to participate in the study. Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme, Pregnant and breast-feeding women
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Other: Questionary with a case-report-form
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Other: Questionary with a case-report-form
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Other: Questionary with a case-report-form
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Other: Questionary with a case-report-form
A single E-case report form (CRF) for every group (a 45 minutes interview)
Other: Questionary with a case-report-form
Questionary with : Gender, Age, Marital Status, medical history, Socio-économic description, skills assessment test written by R-Shankland, AUDIT-C, fargestrom, HAD, CAST, EPICE, Stroop-Test, Trail making test, Rosenberg Test
Score of psychosocial skills
15-item scale, grouped into 4 axes: emotional (5 items), cognitive (4 items), social (4 items), assertiveness (2 items). The response modality is a Likert scale with 7 possible answers ranging from "Never" (1) to "Always" (7). The alpha-cronbach coefficient was 0.754 for the cognitive axis, 0.731 for the social axis and 0.654 for the emotional axis
Time frame: 5 minutes
Results of the others test
Sociodemographics criterias, intrinsics criteria, medical history, patient's health
Time frame: 45 minutes
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand