CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07140419E-CCTAUpdated Mar 20, 2026

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Combined With CT-FFR in Intermediate-Risk Chest Pain Patients.

An interventional study of Coronary computed tomographic angiography with CT - derived fractional flow reserve in Chest Pain, Coronary Artery Disease and Emergency Department, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-20.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the guiding value of coronary CTA combined with CT-FFR in diagnostic and treatment decision-making for emergency chest pain patients at moderate risk, as well as its impact on clinical outcomes. Through a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial, this research compares the preventive effects of early application of this technology versus standard care on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), with the goal of optimizing the diagnostic and treatment processes for emergency chest pain patients.

Read the detailed description

This study involves intermediate-risk emergency department patients presenting with chest pain or symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but without acute myocardial infarction (AMI), defined by a HEART score greater than 3. After providing written informed consent, these patients are randomized to one of two strategies: an initial approach incorporating early coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) or a standard care pathway without early CCTA. Patients in the CCTA group receive standard care as determined by their treating physician and undergo CCTA as soon as possible, typically within 24 hours and at most within 21 days. The results of the CCTA, including coronary artery stenosis severity and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) values, are provided to the physician to inform further management, which may include invasive coronary angiography, medical therapy, or lifestyle interventions.

In contrast, patients randomized to the standard care group without early CCTA proceed with physician-directed evaluations that may include non-invasive functional tests such as exercise electrocardiography, stress echocardiography, or nuclear imaging according to local clinical practices, though CCTA is not part of their initial workup. Both groups receive optimal preventive care in line with current guidelines, and treating physicians are encouraged to initiate secondary prevention measures like antiplatelet therapy or statin use if any diagnostic tests reveal signs of coronary artery disease (CAD).

The primary endpoint of the study is a composite of death, readmission due to myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina requiring revascularization. The trial aims to determine whether an early CCTA strategy improves diagnostic and treatment decision-making for intermediate-risk chest pain patients, ultimately influencing clinical outcomes compared to standard care. The study incorporates a prospective, multicenter design to ensure broad applicability and rigor, with careful attention to patient safety and adherence to ethical standards throughout the enrollment and follow-up processes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chest Pain
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Emergency Department

Keywords

  • Intermediate Risk Chest Pain
  • Emergency Department
  • CCTA
  • CT-FFR
  • Coronary Artery Disease
03

In context

Chest Pain

381 studies on the registry are indexed under Chest Pain; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,000 is above the median of 143 across 201 interventional studies indexed under Chest Pain.

Browse Chest Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 299 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age≥18 years;
  2. Within 24 hours of presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD);
  3. HEART-score >3 (according to http://www.heartscore.nl/);
  4. Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to obtain informed consent;
  2. Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) requiring urgent revascularization;
  3. Known Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) or previous PCI or CABG;
  4. Concomitant severe congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III-IV or left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] \< 30%) or acute pulmonary edema;
  5. Severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh score ≥ C, or aspartate aminotransferase [AST] > 5× upper limit of normal); severe renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m²) or patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis;
  6. History of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG);
  7. Severe allergy to iodinated contrast agents;
  8. Inability to obtain high-quality imaging;
  9. Pregnant or lactating females;
  10. Concomitant diseases or limited life expectancy, quality of life, or functional status precluding further CAD evaluation;
  11. Any other factors that, in the investigator's judgment, make the patient unsuitable for study enrollment, completion of the study, or follow-up.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Arm

    Patients receive early coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) combined with CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) to guide diagnostic and treatment decisions, in addition to standard care.

    Diagnostic Test: Coronary computed tomographic angiography with CT - derived fractional flow reserve

  • No intervention
    Control Arm

    Patients receive standard care without early CCTA, with further management determined at the discretion of their treating physician.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCoronary computed tomographic angiography with CT - derived fractional flow reserve

    A non-invasive coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) protocol that visualizes coronary anatomy to evaluate the presence, location, and severity of atherosclerotic stenosis, coupled with CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) analysis-a computational fluid dynamics method applied to CCTA datasets-to assess the hemodynamic significance of identified stenoses and identify lesions likely to induce myocardial ischemia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, and unstable angina pectoris

    Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a pivotal composite endpoint in cardiovascular clinical trials, are defined as the aggregate occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal ST - elevation or non - ST - elevation myocardial infarction (reflecting ischemic myocardial injury), nonfatal ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (denoting cerebrovascular ischemia or hemorrhage), coronary revascularization (encompassing percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\] or coronary artery bypass grafting \[CABG\] for obstructive coronary lesions), and unstable angina pectoris (characterized by new - onset or crescendo chest pain indicative of acute coronary syndrome without myocardial necrosis).

    Time frame: The enrollment phase will last for 2 years, and follow-up for all participants will continue until 12 months after the last participant is enrolled.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Recurrent Emergency Department Visit for Chest Pain

    Re-presentation with chest pain as the main complaint

    Time frame: The enrollment phase will last for 2 years, and follow-up for all participants will continue until 12 months after the last participant is enrolled

  2. Hospitalization Rate due to Chest Pain or Stroke

    Time frame: 1 month; the enrollment phase will last for 2 years, and follow-up for all participants will continue until 12 months after the last participant is enrolled

  3. Incidence of All-cause mortality

    All-cause mortality (cardiovascular death, non-cardiovascular death, death of undetermined cause)

    Time frame: The enrollment phase will last for 2 years, and follow-up for all participants will continue until 12 months after the last participant is enrolled.

  4. Proportion of Patients Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography

    Time frame: The enrollment phase will last for 2 years, and follow-up for all participants will continue until 12 months after the last participant is enrolled.

  5. Proportion of Patients with Non-Obstructive CAD at Invasive Coronary Angiography

    Time frame: The enrollment phase will last for 2 years, and follow-up for all participants will continue until 12 months after the last participant is enrolled.

  6. Effect of an Early CCTA with CT-FFR Diagnostic Strategy on Preventive Medication Utilization (antiplatelet agents, lipid-lowering therapies) in Intermediate-Risk Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients

    Utilization of preventive medications (antiplatelet agents, lipid-lowering therapies), including antiplatelet therapy, statins, and antihypertensive agents.

    Time frame: 1 Year, 2 Year, 3 Year, 4 Year, and 5 Year.

  7. Health economic evaluation endpoints

    Including Direct Medical Costs, Direct Non-Medical Costs and Indirect Costs. Costs will be standardized to 2025 Chinese Yuan using national health service price indices.

    Time frame: 1 Year and 5 Year

  8. Quality of Life Assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)

    The Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) is a validated, patient-reported instrument assessing functional status and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status and quality of life. Change from baseline to follow-up will be measured.

    Time frame: 1 Year and 5 Year

  9. Quality of Life Assessed by the EQ-5D Index Scores

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. The EQ-5D index score ranges from -0.594 (worst health state) to 1.0 (perfect health). Higher scores indicate better health utility. Change from baseline to follow-up will be measured.

    Time frame: 1 Year and 5 Year

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Participants with Allergic Reactions or Anaphylaxis within 24 Hours Post-CCTA or Invasive Coronary Angiography

    Safety Outcome Measure

    Time frame: Within 24 hours of CCTA or invasive coronary angiography

  2. Number of Participants with Acute Liver or Kidney Injury within 7 Days Post-CCTA or Invasive Coronary Angiography

    Safety Outcome Measure

    Time frame: Within 7 days of CCTA or invasive coronary angiography

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chuanbao Li
    Jinan, Shandong 250000, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, Amsterdam E, Bhatt DL, Birtcher KK, Blankstein R, Boyd J, Bullock-Palmer RP, Conejo T, Diercks DB, Gentile F, Greenwood JP, Hess EP, Hollenberg SM, Jaber WA, Jneid H, Joglar JA, Morrow DA, O'Connor RE, Ross MA, Shaw LJ. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021 Nov 30;144(22):e368-e454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001029. Epub 2021 Oct 28. PubMed 34709879 ↗
  • Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, Chou ET, Woodard PK, Nagurney JT, Pope JH, Hauser TH, White CS, Weiner SG, Kalanjian S, Mullins ME, Mikati I, Peacock WF, Zakroysky P, Hayden D, Goehler A, Lee H, Gazelle GS, Wiviott SD, Fleg JL, Udelson JE; ROMICAT-II Investigators. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 26;367(4):299-308. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201161. PubMed 22830462 ↗
  • Gongora CA, Bavishi C, Uretsky S, Argulian E. Acute chest pain evaluation using coronary computed tomography angiography compared with standard of care: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Heart. 2018 Feb;104(3):215-221. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311647. Epub 2017 Aug 30. PubMed 28855273 ↗
  • Foy AJ, Dhruva SS, Peterson B, Mandrola JM, Morgan DJ, Redberg RF. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Nov 1;177(11):1623-1631. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4772. PubMed 28973101 ↗
  • SCOT-HEART Investigators; Newby DE, Adamson PD, Berry C, Boon NA, Dweck MR, Flather M, Forbes J, Hunter A, Lewis S, MacLean S, Mills NL, Norrie J, Roditi G, Shah ASV, Timmis AD, van Beek EJR, Williams MC. Coronary CT Angiography and 5-Year Risk of Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 6;379(10):924-933. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805971. Epub 2018 Aug 25. PubMed 30145934 ↗
  • Moss AJ, Williams MC, Newby DE, Nicol ED. The Updated NICE Guidelines: Cardiac CT as the First-Line Test for Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2017;10(5):15. doi: 10.1007/s12410-017-9412-6. Epub 2017 Mar 27. PubMed 28446943 ↗
  • Goodacre S, Thokala P, Carroll C, Stevens JW, Leaviss J, Al Khalaf M, Collinson P, Morris F, Evans P, Wang J. Systematic review, meta-analysis and economic modelling of diagnostic strategies for suspected acute coronary syndrome. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(1):v-vi, 1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta17010. PubMed 23331845 ↗
  • Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, Walker S, Cook J, Jia X, Hillis GS, Fraser C. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(17):iii-iv, ix-143. doi: 10.3310/hta12170. PubMed 18462576 ↗
  • Ljung L, Lindahl B, Eggers KM, Frick M, Linder R, Lofmark HB, Martinsson A, Melki D, Sarkar N, Svensson P, Jernberg T. A Rule-Out Strategy Based on High-Sensitivity Troponin and HEART Score Reduces Hospital Admissions. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 May;73(5):491-499. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.11.039. Epub 2019 Jan 17. PubMed 30661856 ↗
  • Shen C, Ge J. Epidemic of Cardiovascular Disease in China: Current Perspective and Prospects for the Future. Circulation. 2018 Jul 24;138(4):342-344. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.033484. No abstract available. PubMed 30571361 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07140419
Lead sponsor
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Collaborators
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, JiNing NO.1 People Hospital, Zhun Ge Er Qi Central Hospital
Responsible party
Chuanbao Li (Clinical Professor, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 20, 2026

Study contacts

Chuanbao Li
Contact
bao2460@126.com
+86 18560083097

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion