ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07140107Updated Aug 24, 2025

Effectiveness of Original vs. AI-Generated Plain Language Summaries of Systematic Reviews

An interventional study of AI-generated PLS and Original PLS in Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer, sponsored by University of Split, School of Medicine. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Croatia. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-24.

Sponsored by University of Split, School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study explores how patients with non-metastatic breast cancer perceive and comprehend original Plain Language Summary and AI-generated Plain Language Summary (PLS) of two systematic reviews from the Cochrane Library. The systematic reviews address exercise during adjuvant therapy and psychological interventions for non-metastatic breast cancer. The study, which is randomized and double-blind, aims to assess whether AI-generated PLS and original PLS differ in their influence on patients' intention to undertake and apply the recommendation presented in the summary, as well as their overall understanding of the study results.

Read the detailed description

Studies show that Plain Language Summaries (PLS), which are intended to improve accessibility to health information for laypeople, are lacking in terms of comprehension, readability, and user engagement. Further empirical research is needed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of AI-generated summaries versus original Plain Language Summaries. This study, conducted at the Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy at the University Hospital of Split aims to explore whether large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, can be leveraged to provide summaries of complex medical content, as those found in systematic reviews, to be more streamlined and adapted for laypeople. The prospective, randomized, single-center, parallel group, double-blind, controlled trial focuses specifically on patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer, histologically confirmed, and aims to help them make more evidence-based medical decisions regarding their health and recovery. The study's primary objective is to analyze patients' level of intention for changing their behavior and start applying the interventions described in the summary. The level of intention to change behavior will be measured using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 100 (0 - do not agree at all and 100 - fully agree). The secondary outcomes are patients' level of understanding calculated by the score received on a five-question knowledge survey (5 as a maximum score), the level of trust in (range 0-100) and clarity of (range 0-100) the information presented in the PLS, and their confidence in their decision to change behavior (range 0-100). The survey is based on the information presented in the PLS and the questions focus on patients' understanding of the benefits and risks of the intervention as well as the quality of evidence described in the systematic reviews. Recruitment for this study will take place over 6 months. Patients will be invited to participate in the study before or after their routine oncology appointment. The participants will read two summaries from two respective Cochrane reviews: exercise during adjuvant therapy and psychological interventions for non-metastatic breast cancer. They will then take the brief survey that tests the impact and likelihood of applying the recommendations described in the summary and their overall understanding of the medical information discussed in the reviews. The study includes female adult oncology patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer, histologically confirmed, following a modality of the treatment, which includes one or more of the following: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (with or without immunotherapy or antiHER2 therapy); adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without immunotherapy or antiHER2 therapy); adjuvant radiotherapy (including local and locoregional radiation treatment, with possible radiotherapy boost where indicated). Since participants in this study are limited to reading material and completing a survey, the study is non-invasive in nature and poses low-risk. Data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics to summarize participant characteristics and assess baseline comparability between the two study arms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • health literacy
  • breast cancer
  • artificial intelligence
  • plain language summary
  • systematic reviews
  • Cochrane
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 130 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Split, School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • female patients with confirmed non- breast cancer currently undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy:

    1. chemotherapy (with or without immunotherapy or antiHER2 therapy),
    2. adjuvant chemotherapy (with or without immunotherapy or antiHER2 therapy),
    3. adjuvant radiotherapy (including local and locoregional radiation treatment with possible radiotherapy boost where indicated).
  • patients need to be able to read and understand Croatian.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • female patients with breast cancer.
  • female patients receiving only hormonal treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
130 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients Receiving AI-generated Plain Language Summaries

    Experimental Group: participants in this group receive two AI-generated Plain Language Summaries based on the scientific abstract of two Cochrane systematic reviews: Exercise during Adjuvant Therapy (1) and Psychological Interventions for Non-metastatic Breast Cancer (2).

    Behavioral: AI-generated PLS

  • Active comparator
    Patients Receiving Original Plain Language Summaries

    Active Comparative Group: participants in this group receive two original Plain Language Summaries based on the scientific abstract of two Cochrane systematic reviews: Exercise during Adjuvant Therapy (1) and Psychological Interventions for Non-metastatic Breast Cancer (2).

    Behavioral: Original PLS

Interventions

  • BehavioralAI-generated PLS

    Reading AI-generated Plain Language Summaries of two Cochrane systematic reviews covering the same two evidence-based topics: exercise during adjuvant therapy and psychological interventions for non-metastatic breast cancer.

  • BehavioralOriginal PLS

    Reading original Plain Language Summaries of two Cochrane systematic reviews covering the same two evidence-based topics: exercise during adjuvant therapy and psychological interventions for non-metastatic breast cancer.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patients' level of intention for changing their behavior

    Patients' level of intention for changing their behavior and start applying the interventions described in the summary, measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 (do not agree at all to 100 fully agree).

    Time frame: Immediately after reading individual PLS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients' comprehension of the information presented in the summary

    Patients' level of understanding of the information presented in the summaries calculated by the score received on a five-question knowledge survey (score range 0-5).

    Time frame: Immediately after reading individual PLS

  2. Patients' level of trust in the information presented

    Patients' level of trust in the information presented in the summaries, measured on a VAS (range 0-100).

    Time frame: Immediately after reading individual PLS

  3. Patients' level of perceived clarity in the information

    Patients' level of perceived clarity of the information presented in the summaries, measured on a VAS (range 0-100).

    Time frame: Immediately after reading individual PLS

  4. Patient's level of confidence in their decision to change behavior

    Patients' level of confidence in the decision to change behavior, measured on a VAS (range 0-100)

    Time frame: Immediately after reading individual PLS

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Split
    Split, 21000, Croatia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hasannejadasl H, Roumen C, Smit Y, Dekker A, Fijten R. Health Literacy and eHealth: Challenges and Strategies. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Sep;6:e2200005. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00005. PubMed 36194843 ↗
  • Seiler A, Jenewein J. Resilience in Cancer Patients. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 5;10:208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31024362 ↗
  • Goerling U, Faller H, Hornemann B, Honig K, Bergelt C, Maatouk I, Stein B, Teufel M, Erim Y, Geiser F, Niecke A, Senf B, Wickert M, Buttner-Teleaga A, Weis J. Information needs in cancer patients across the disease trajectory. A prospective study. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jan;103(1):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.011. Epub 2019 Aug 12. PubMed 31474389 ↗
  • Diefenbach M, Turner G, Carpenter KM, Sheldon LK, Mustian KM, Gerend MA, Rini C, von Wagner C, Gritz ER, McQueen A, Prayor-Patterson HM, Miller SM. Cancer and patient-physician communication. J Health Commun. 2009;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):57-65. doi: 10.1080/10810730902814079. PubMed 19449269 ↗
  • Rosa WE, Levoy K, Doyon K, McDarby M, Ferrell BR, Parker PA, Sanders JJ, Epstein AS, Sullivan DR, Rosenberg AR. Integrating evidence-based communication principles into routine cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2023 Sep 8;31(10):566. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08020-x. PubMed 37682354 ↗
  • Buljan I, Tokalic R, Roguljic M, Zakarija-Grkovic I, Vrdoljak D, Milic P, Puljak L, Marusic A. Framing the numerical findings of Cochrane plain language summaries: two randomized controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 6;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00990-4. PubMed 32375659 ↗
  • Gainey K, Smith J, McCaffery K, Clifford S, Muscat D. Are plain language summaries published in health journals written according to instructions and health literacy principles? A systematic environmental scan. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 27;14(11):e086464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086464. PubMed 39608994 ↗
  • Banic A, Fidahic M, Suto J, Roje R, Vuka I, Puljak L, Buljan I. Conclusiveness, linguistic characteristics and readability of Cochrane plain language summaries of intervention reviews: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 10;22(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01721-7. PubMed 36088293 ↗
  • Zaretsky J, Kim JM, Baskharoun S, Zhao Y, Austrian J, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Gupta R, Blecker SB, Feldman J. Generative Artificial Intelligence to Transform Inpatient Discharge Summaries to Patient-Friendly Language and Format. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e240357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0357. PubMed 38466307 ↗
  • Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, Vignat J, Gralow JR, Cardoso F, Siesling S, Soerjomataram I. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022 Dec;66:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. Epub 2022 Sep 2. PubMed 36084384 ↗
  • Soldato D, Arecco L, Agostinetto E, Franzoi MA, Mariamidze E, Begijanashvili S, Brunetti N, Spinaci S, Solinas C, Vaz-Luis I, Di Meglio A, Lambertini M. The Future of Breast Cancer Research in the Survivorship Field. Oncol Ther. 2023 Jun;11(2):199-229. doi: 10.1007/s40487-023-00225-8. Epub 2023 Apr 1. PubMed 37005952 ↗
  • Nardin S, Mora E, Varughese FM, D'Avanzo F, Vachanaram AR, Rossi V, Saggia C, Rubinelli S, Gennari A. Breast Cancer Survivorship, Quality of Life, and Late Toxicities. Front Oncol. 2020 Jun 16;10:864. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00864. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32612947 ↗
  • Shaikh H, Bradhurst P, Ma LX, Tan SYC, Egger SJ, Vardy JL. Body weight management in overweight and obese breast cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 11;12(12):CD012110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012110.pub2. PubMed 33305350 ↗
  • Suto Pavicic J, Marusic A, Buljan I. Using ChatGPT to Improve the Presentation of Plain Language Summaries of Cochrane Systematic Reviews About Oncology Interventions: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Cancer. 2025 Mar 19;11:e63347. doi: 10.2196/63347. PubMed 40106236 ↗
  • Suto J, Marusic A, Buljan I. Linguistic analysis of plain language summaries and corresponding scientific summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews about oncology interventions. Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(9):10950-10960. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5825. Epub 2023 Mar 23. PubMed 36951519 ↗
  • Stephan D, Bertsch AS, Schumacher S, Puladi B, Burwinkel M, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW, Thiem DG. Improving Patient Communication by Simplifying AI-Generated Dental Radiology Reports With ChatGPT: Comparative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 9;27:e73337. doi: 10.2196/73337. PubMed 40489773 ↗
  • Furmaniak AC, Menig M, Markes MH. Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 21;9(9):CD005001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005001.pub3. PubMed 27650122 ↗
  • Jassim GA, Whitford DL, Hickey A, Carter B. Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 28;(5):CD008729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008729.pub2. PubMed 26017383 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymous dataset from the study.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Clinical study report

Time frame: Anonymous dataset will be available with the publication of the study.

Access criteria: Anyone

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2026, 5 months after the start.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 18, 2025
First posted
Aug 24, 2025
StartActual
Aug 14, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Last update
Aug 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07140107
Lead sponsor
University of Split, School of Medicine
Collaborators
University Hospital of Split
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2025
Start date
Aug 14, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion