ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07135232Updated Mar 27, 2026

The Effects of Resistance Training and a Plant-Based Supplement on Perimenopausal Symptoms and Muscle Health.

An interventional study of Sarmentosin - L- theanine and Resistance Training in Perimenopause and Menopause, sponsored by Leeds Beckett University. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by Leeds Beckett University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine if resistance training and a newly developed plant-based nutritional supplement can improve the symptoms and musculoskeletal health of perimenopausal women.

The main questions it aims to evaluate are:

  1. Can resistance training and the nutritional supplement - both independently and in combination - improve perimenopausal symptoms (e.g. cognition, mood, sleep) and musculoskeletal outcomes (e.g. strength, muscle mass)?
  2. What are the acute effects of the nutritional supplement on cognitive function and mood in perimenopausal women, and is this response altered following long-term intake (12 weeks)?
  3. What mechanisms may be contributing to the results?

Participants will be split into four groups to allow the researchers to answer the above questions. These are:

  1. The nutritional supplement + resistance training
  2. The nutritional supplement only
  3. The placebo supplement (A look alike capsule that contains no active ingredients) and resistance training
  4. The Placebo supplement only.

Participants will:

  • Take their allocated supplement daily and perform home-based strength exercise 3 times per week (for exercise groups), for 12 weeks.
  • Attend the laboratory at the beginning and end of the 12 weeks to assess cognitive function and mood following acute intake of the supplement.
  • Attend the laboratory every 4 weeks during the 12 week period, for assessment of cognitive function, symptom severity and muscle health.
  • Provide a blood sample at each visit for assessment of mechanistic pathways.
02

Conditions studied

  • Perimenopause
  • Menopause

Keywords

  • Mood
  • Depression
  • Cognition
  • Resistance Training
  • Sarmentosin - L-theanine
  • Bioactive supplement
  • perimenopause symptoms
  • menopause
  • lifestyle
  • muscle
  • health
  • exercise
  • perimenopause
  • symptoms
  • hot flashes
  • vasomotor
  • anxiety
  • stress
03

In context

Depression

8,577 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,720 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is below the median of 81 across 7,063 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Leeds Beckett University is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Perimenopausal women between 40 - 55 years
  2. Not currently engaging in consistent structured resistance training (defined as >3 resistance training sessions per week for 4 consecutive weeks, in the past six months).
  3. Not on any HRT or hormonal for at least one year before initiation of the study.
  4. Able to attend laboratory visits and commit to the intervention schedule for 6 months.
  5. Willing to provide blood samples
  6. Not regularly consuming any dietary supplements containing concentrated sarmentosin, L-theanine or other compounds that may interfere with the study intervention.
  7. Willing to limit dietary intake of Sarmentosin (e.g. Blackcurrant) and L-theanine (e.g. green tea/ black tea).
  8. Willing and able to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosed cardiovascular disease (CVD), uncontrolled hypertension (>160/100 mmHg), or other conditions that prevent safe exercise participation.
  2. Clinically diagnosed mental health disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, severe depression requiring medication adjustment within the last 6 months).
  3. Neurological conditions affecting cognitive function (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy).
  4. Endocrine disorders that could impact hormonal fluctuations or metabolism (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, thyroid dysfunction).
  5. History of major musculoskeletal injuries (e.g., fractures, joint replacement) within the past 6 months
  6. Regular use of medications that could interfere with study outcomes, including antidepressants, , beta-blockers.
  7. Obesity ( >30 or for South Asian Ethinicity BMI> 27.5)
  8. Food allergy or intolerance to study products.
  9. Use of illicit drugs.
  10. Alcohol intake exceeding the government guidelines of 14 standard units per week (Equivalent of 6 standard drinks).
  11. Pregnant or planning to conceive during the trial.
  12. High habitual caffeine intake (>400 mg/day which is approximately 4-5 cups of coffee)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Supplement Only

    Two placebo capsules to be consumed by participants daily

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo Supplement

  • Experimental
    Placebo Supplement and Resistance Training

    Participants will consume two placebo supplements daily, and perform structured resistance training three times per week.

    Other: Resistance Training · Dietary Supplement: Placebo Supplement

  • Experimental
    Active Supplement Only

    Participants will consume two capsules of the Sarmentosin - L-theanine supplement daily.

    Dietary Supplement: Sarmentosin - L- theanine

  • Experimental
    Active Supplement and Resistance Training

    Participants will consume two capsules of the Sarmentosin - L-theanine supplement daily and perform structured resistance training three times per week.

    Dietary Supplement: Sarmentosin - L- theanine · Other: Resistance Training

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementSarmentosin - L- theanine

    Two capsules to give an overall dose of 20 mg of Sarmentosin and 400mg of L-theanine

  • OtherResistance Training

    Home-based Resistance training. Exercises will target the lower and upper body and utilise body weight, resistance bands, dumbbells and push-up handles.

    Also known as: Strength Training, Resistance Exercise, Strength Exercise

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo Supplement

    Capsules matched for taste and appearance, without any active ingredients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Depressive Symptom Score at week 4

    Assessed using the depressive sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Depressive Symptom Score at Week 8

    Assessed using the depressive sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. Depressive Symptom Score at Week 12

    Assessed using the depressive sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Change in Sustained Attention Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake at Week 1

    Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake at week 1 of the intervention.

  5. Change in Sustained Attention Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake at Week 12

    Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake at week 12 of the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Verbal Episodic Memory Performance at Week 4

    Assessed as the number of errors made on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal paired associates task.

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Verbal Episodic Memory Performance at Week 8

    Assessed as the number of errors made on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal paired associates task

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. Verbal Episodic Memory Performance at Week 12

    Assessed as the number of errors made on the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal paired associates task.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Working Memory Performance at Week 4

    Assessed as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery digit span task.

    Time frame: Week 4

  5. Working Memory Performance at Week 8

    Assessed as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery digit span task

    Time frame: Week 8

  6. Working Memory Performance at Week 12

    Assessed as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery digit span task.

    Time frame: Week 12

  7. Spatial Planning and Working Memory Performance at Week 4

    Assessed as the total number of assessed trials where the subject chose the correct answer on their first attempt in the One touch stockings of Cambridge task.

    Time frame: Week 4

  8. Spatial Planning and Working Memory Performance at week 8

    Assessed as the total number of assessed trials where the subject chose the correct answer on their first attempt in the One touch stockings of Cambridge task.

    Time frame: Week 8

  9. Spatial Planning and Working Memory Performance at Week 12

    Assessed as the total number of assessed trials where the subject chose the correct answer on their first attempt in the One touch stockings of Cambridge task.

    Time frame: Week 12

  10. Sustained Attention Performance at Week 4

    Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.

    Time frame: Week 4

  11. Sustained Attention Performance at week 8

    Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test

    Time frame: Week 8

  12. Sustained Attention Performance at Week 12

    Assessed as the signal detection measure of a subject's sensitivity to the target sequence (A') during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery rapid visual information processing test.

    Time frame: Week 12

  13. Subjective Memory Complaints at Week 4

    Assessed using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised. Retrieval subscale (seven items, range 0-28) and the attentional subscale (four items, score range 0-16). A higher score indicates greater presence of subjective memory or attention difficulties.

    Time frame: Week 4

  14. Subjective Memory Complaints at Week 8

    Assessed using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised. Retrieval subscale (seven items, range 0-28) and the attentional subscale (four items, score range 0-16). A higher score indicates greater presence of subjective memory or attention difficulties.

    Time frame: Week 8

  15. Subjective Memory Complaints at Week 12

    Assessed using the Everyday Memory Questionnaire - Revised. Retrieval subscale (seven items, range 0-28) and the attentional subscale (four items, score range 0-16). A higher score indicates greater presence of subjective memory or attention difficulties.

    Time frame: Week 12

  16. Self-reported Sleep Quality at Week 4

    Assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, to give a global score between 0 and 21.Higher scores signify poorer subjective sleep quality.

    Time frame: Week 4

  17. Self-reported Sleep Quality at Week 8

    Assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, to give a global score between 0 and 21. Higher scores signify poorer subjective sleep quality.

    Time frame: Week 8

  18. Self-reported Sleep Quality at Week 12

    Assessed using the Pittsburgh sleep quality index. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, to give a global score between 0 and 21. Higher scores signify poorer subjective sleep quality.

    Time frame: Week 12

  19. Self-reported Hot Flash Severity and Frequency at Week 4

    Assessed using the Hot flush rating scale. Split into two sub-sections: frequency and problem rating. Scored on a scale from 1 -10, the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean from the three items. A higher score indicates greater problem rating.

    Time frame: Week 4

  20. Self-reported Hot Flash Severity and Frequency at Week 8

    Assessed using the Hot flush rating scale. Split into two sub-sections: frequency and problem rating. Scored on a scale from 1 -10, the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean from the three items. A higher score indicates greater problem rating.

    Time frame: Week 8

  21. Self-reported Hot Flash Severity and Frequency at Week 12

    Assessed using the Hot flush rating scale. Split into two sub-sections: frequency and problem rating. Scored on a scale from 1 -10, the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean from the three items. A higher score indicates greater problem rating.

    Time frame: Week 12

  22. Anxiety Symptoms at Week 4

    Assessed using the anxiety sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 4

  23. Anxiety Symptoms at Week 8

    Assessed using the anxiety sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 8

  24. Anxiety Symptoms at Week 12

    Assessed using the anxiety sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 12

  25. Stress symptoms at Week 4

    Assessed using the stress sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 4

  26. Stress Symptoms at Week 8

    Assessed using the stress sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 8

  27. Stress Symptoms at Week 12

    Assessed using the stress sub-scale of the Depression, Anxiety and stress scale - 21 items. Assessed on a scale from 0 - 3 over 7 questions, with a maximum score of 42. Higher scores indicate more severe stress symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 12

  28. Quality of Life Score at Week 4

    Assessed using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire. The score for each domain ranges from 1 to 8, and the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean score. Higher score represents worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Week 4

  29. Quality of Life Score at Week 8

    Assessed using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire. The score for each domain ranges from 1 to 8, and the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean score. Higher score represents worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Week 8

  30. Quality of Life Score at Week 12

    Assessed using the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire. The score for each domain ranges from 1 to 8, and the overall problem rating is calculated as the mean score. Higher score represents worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Week 12

  31. Change in Handgrip Strength from baseline to Week 12

    Assessed using a handgrip dynamometer.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  32. change in Leg Extensor Submaximal Strength from baseline to Week 12

    Assessed using the 4-6RM leg extensor strength test.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  33. Change in Isometric Mid-thigh Pull Strength from baseline to Week 12

    Assessed using a portable back and leg dynamometer in a standing horizontal pull configuration

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  34. Change in the Number of Reps Completed in the 30 Second Sit-to-stand Test from baseline to week 12

    Assessed as the number of reps completed in 30 seconds

    Time frame: baseline and Week 12

  35. Change in Appendicular Lean Mass from baseline to Week 12

    Measured using dual X-ray Absorptiometry

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  36. Felt-affect Visual Analogue score at week 4

    To assess the perceived impact of the supplement on mood and cognitive function. Higher scores indicate greater perceived impact

    Time frame: Week 4

  37. Felt-affect Visual Analogue score at week 8

    To assess the perceived impact of the supplement on mood and cognitive function. Higher scores indicate greater perceived impact

    Time frame: Week 8

  38. Felt-affect Visual Analogue score at week 12

    To assess the perceived impact of the supplement on mood and cognitive function. Higher scores indicate greater perceived impact

    Time frame: Week 12

  39. Exercise Enjoyment at week 1

    Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.

    Time frame: Week 1

  40. Exercise Enjoyment at week 4

    Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.

    Time frame: Week 4

  41. Exercise Enjoyment at week 8

    Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.

    Time frame: Week 8

  42. Exercise Enjoyment at week 12

    Assessed as overall score on the physical activity enjoyment scale on a likert scale from 1 to 7. Overall score is calculated as a sum of all scores once reverse items have been calculated. Higher scores indicate greater exercise enjoyment.

    Time frame: Week 12

  43. Change in Verbal Episodic Memory Performance from Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1.

    Measured as the number of errors during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal Paired associates task.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1

  44. Change in Verbal Episodic Memory Performance From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 12

    Measured as the number of errors during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery verbal Paired associates task.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

  45. Change in Working Memory Performance From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1

    Measured as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery backwards digit span task.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1

  46. Change In Working Memory Performance From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 12.

    Measured as the longest sequence successfully completed during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery backwards digit span task.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

  47. Change in Spatial Planning and Working Memory Performance From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1.

    Measured as the number of problems completed using the minimum number of moves during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery stockings of Cambridge task.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1.

  48. Change in Spatial Planning and Working Memory Performance From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1.

    Measured as the number of problems completed using the minimum number of moves during the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery stockings of Cambridge task.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

  49. Change in Mood State From Pre- to Post- Supplement Intake in week 1

    Assessed using the Bond-Lader visual analogue scale. Scores can be split into alertness, contentment and calmness with lower scores indicating a higher experience of the positive mood state.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1.

  50. Change in Mood State From Pre- to Post- Supplement Intake in Week 12

    Assessed using the Bond-Lader visual analogue scale. Scores can be split into alertness, contentment and calmness with lower scores indicating a higher experience of the positive mood state.

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

  51. Change in total body fat percentage from baseline to Week 12

    Measured using dual X-ray Absorptiometry

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Other outcomes

  1. A Panel of Serum Steroid Hormones (e.g. Oestradiol, Progesterone, Testosterone and Cortisol) at Week 4

    Analysed using LCMS from a serum sample.

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. A Panel of Serum Steroid Hormones (e.g. Oestradiol, Progesterone, Testosterone and Cortisol) at Week 8

    Analysed using LCMS from a serum sample.

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. A Panel of Serum Steroid Hormones (e.g. Oestradiol, Progesterone, Testosterone and Cortisol) at Week 12

    Analysed using LCMS from a serum sample.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor at week 4

    Analysed using ELISA from obtained serum sample

    Time frame: Week 4

  5. Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor at Week 8

    Analysed using ELISA from obtained serum sample

    Time frame: Week 8

  6. Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor at Week 12

    Analysed using ELISA from obtained serum sample

    Time frame: Week 12

  7. Change From Baseline in Monoamine Oxidase A & B Activity at Week 4

    Analysed using Amplex assay kit.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 4

  8. Change from baseline in Monoamine oxidase A & B activity at week 8

    Analysed using Amplex assay kit.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  9. Change from baseline in Monoamine oxidase A & B activity at week 12

    Analysed using Amplex assay kit.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

  10. Change from baseline in plasma sarmentosin at week 4

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Baseline to week 4

  11. Change from baseline in plasma sarmentosin at week 8

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Baseline to week 8

  12. Change from baseline in plasma sarmentosin at week 12

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Baseline to week 12

  13. Inflammatory Cytokines (IL6, TNF-α) at week 4

    Analysed using ELISA

    Time frame: Week 4

  14. Inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL6, TNF-α) at week 8

    Analysed using ELISA

    Time frame: Week 8

  15. Inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL6, TNF-α) at week 12

    Analysed using ELISA

    Time frame: Week 12

  16. Change in Sarmentosin Levels From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1.

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1

  17. Change in Sarmentosin Levels From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 12

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

  18. Change in L-theanine Levels From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1.

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1

  19. Change in L-theanine Levels From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 12

    Analysed using LCMS

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

  20. Change in Plasma Monoamine Oxidase A and B Activity From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 1

    Analysed using amplex assay kits

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 1

  21. Change in Plasma Monoamine Oxidase A and B Activity From Pre- to Post-Supplement Intake in Week 12

    Analysed using amplex assay kits

    Time frame: Pre- to 1 hour post- supplement intake in week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07135232
Lead sponsor
Leeds Beckett University
Responsible party
Harriet Cannell (Doctoral Researcher, Leeds Beckett University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2025
Start date
Mar 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Harriet Cannell
Contact
H.cannell@leedsbeckett.ac.uk
+447805576688
Theocharis Ispogolou
Contact
T.Ispoglou@leedsbeckett.ac.uk

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion