ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07134634Updated Aug 21, 2025

Effect of a Vibrating Therapy Ball on Tremor and Daily Activities in Patients With Different Tremor Syndroms

An observational study in Parkinson Disease, sponsored by Parkinson's Clinic in Beelitz-Heilstatten. Recruiting at 1 site in Germany. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-21.

Sponsored by Parkinson's Clinic in Beelitz-Heilstatten · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tremors, e.g. in patients with Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, are often pharmacoresistant, meaning that invasive treatment options such as deep brain stimulation are used at an early stage. Sufficient complementary non-pharmacological treatment alternatives do not yet exist. Patients with tremor are often severely restricted in their ability to carry out everyday activities and require support from relatives and carers, e.g. with food intake and hygiene measures.

The VILIM ball device is a CE-certified, non-invasive, portable physiotherapeutic aid. It is intended for use at home or in a professional setting as a mechanical vibration therapy device to temporarily reduce hand tremor.

With this vibrating therapy ball (VILIM tremor ball), which is customised to the patient's tremor during a training phase, should temporarily reduce tremor by up to 50%, according to the manufacturer. The effect can last up to 4 hours, so that patients should be able to carry out their everyday activities better, e.g. eating, writing, etc. (https://vilimed.com).

An initial study already reported a reduction in tremor in patients with Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. However, this study lacked a training phase, a control group and an examination of the effect on functions relevant to everyday life, meaning that reliable conclusions on the effect are only possible to a limited extent In this study, the influence of the portable physiotherapeutic therapy device (VILIM ball) on tremor in the upper extremity compared to an alternative therapy as a control condition in patients with Parkinson's tremor, essential tremor and other tremor syndromes will be investigated for the first time. The evaluation of the physician-associated scales will additionally be carried out by an independent physician in a single-blinded manner on the basis of video documentation.

The primary endpoint is a significant effect of the therapy ball on tremor, quantified and qualified using Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGI severity:

Assessment by doctor and patient) and validated disease-specific tremor scales: MDS-UPDRS IIl including the Tremor subscale, TETRAS between tremor ball therapy (Ball-On) alternative therapy (Ball-Off). Secondary endpoints include the effect of the therapy ball compared to the ball-off condition on tremor analysis data (e.g. frequency peak, amplitude) of an accelerometer, mini darts, writing tasks, specific tasks of daily life: e.g. bringing a spoon with liquid to the mouth, pouring water into a glass without losing the liquid and the success of the therapy using CGI improvement (doctor and patient).

02

Conditions studied

  • Parkinson Disease

Keywords

  • Tremor
03

In context

Parkinson Disease

4,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Parkinson Disease; 1,086 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 96 across 1,085 observational studies indexed under Parkinson Disease.

Browse Parkinson Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Parkinson's Clinic in Beelitz-Heilstatten as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with different tremor syndroms

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. diagnosis of tremor
  2. ability to complete the tests
  3. no cognitive deficits relevant to everyday life

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. cognitive deficits relevant to everyday life that influence therapy
  2. pronounced dystonia, dyskinesia
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Acute thrombotic process (myocardial infarction, (acute vascular constriction)
  5. Implants in activated regions of the body (e.g.artificial joints)
  6. Acute inflammation of the locomotor system active arthrosis or arthropathy e.g. acute inflammationor swelling of joints

    • Acute tendinopathy in activated regions of the body (acute tendon inflammation)

      • Acute desmopathy (acute problems at the intervertebral disc)
    • Fresh fractures in activated regions of the body
  7. Post-surgery wounds and fresh wounds in activated regions of the body or incomplete wound healing
  8. Rheumatoid arthritis
  9. Epilepsy.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-crossover
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • tremor cohort

    Device: tremor device

Interventions

  • Devicetremor device

    tremor ball on versus tremor ball off

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effect of the vibrating therapy ball on hand tremor will be assessed before and after use, comparing ball-on vs. ball-off. The following scores will be used:

    Primary endpoints: * Change in Clinical Global Impression Severity (Assessment by physician and patient) after using the therapy ball (Score 0 to 7 pts., a lower score means better outcome) * Change in MDS-UPDRS part IIl (Score 0 - 132 pts., a lower score means a better outcome) * Change in 2 items of TETRAS Activities of Daily Living Subscale (Score 0 -8 pts., a lower score means a better outcome) Secondary endpoints: * Changes in the frequency of the tremor (in Hz) using an acceleromter. A lower value means a better outcome * Changes in amplitude of the tremor (in mm) using an accelerometer. A lower value means a better outcome * changes in 3 items of Fahn-Tolosa-Marin-Tremor-Rating-Scale (0-12 pts.). A lower score means a better outcome * Change in Clinical Global Impression-Improvment Scale (CGI-I), (0-7 pts., lower score means better outcome

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • ParkinsonBeelitzHeilstaetten
    Beelitz, Brandenburg 14547, Germany
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haubenberger D, Hallett M. Essential Tremor. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1802-1810. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1707928. No abstract available. PubMed 29742376 ↗
  • Abramavicius S, Venslauskas M, Vaitkus A, Gudziunas V, Laucius O, Stankevicius E. Local Vibrational Therapy for Essential Tremor Reduction: A Clinical Study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Oct 21;56(10):552. doi: 10.3390/medicina56100552. PubMed 33096872 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Following the data publication, IPD will be available from the coresponding author upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: see above

Access criteria: see above

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Nov 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 5, 2025
First posted
Aug 21, 2025
StartActual
Nov 8, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Aug 21, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07134634
Lead sponsor
Parkinson's Clinic in Beelitz-Heilstatten
Responsible party
PD Dr. med.habil. Doreen Gruber (Principal Investigator, Parkinson's Clinic in Beelitz-Heilstatten) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2025
Start date
Nov 8, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2025

Study contacts

Gruber, MD
Contact
doreen.gruber@kliniken-beelitz.de
+493320422781

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion