ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07132190Updated Sep 8, 2026

Stereotactic Radiation for Growing/Changing Brain Metastases With Same-Day Radiation Planning and Treatment With Margin Reduction

A Phase 2 interventional study of Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation for brain metastases using 0mm or 1mm PTV in Brain Metastases, Adult, Brain Tumor - Metastatic and Brain Metastases From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), sponsored by Ayal A. Aizer, MD. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-08.

Sponsored by Ayal A. Aizer, MD · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of same-day radiation planning and treatment. The study will shorten the time interval between radiation planning (radiation mapping) and radiation treatment. The intent of this shorter time interval is to increase the likelihood that the brain metastases being treated remain fully within the high-dose radiation fields.

Participants will be randomized to receive brain-directed stereotactic radiation with a 1mm margin or 0mm margin, have their simulation/radiation planning imaging on the same day that brain-directed stereotactic radiation is delivered, and have repeat simulation/radiation planning scans during the course of treatment if more than 2-3 days have elapsed since the most recent scans.

Read the detailed description

Adaptively designed radiation, which adjusts a given radiation plan for real time changes in patient position or anatomy, has become a standard approach within many oncologic entities to combat the effect of shifts between simulation and treatment. Adaptively planned SRS/SRT with same day brain MRI and treatment delivery offers potential to quantify the impact of treatment planning time while also reducing margins and potentially improving rates of local recurrence and radiation necrosis. This trial aims to explore the viability of adaptively designed SRS/SRT with same day planning and treatment in combination with tighter planning margins in both controlling brain metastases locally and minimizing the risk of radiation necrosis in a phase 2 randomized study.

Participants will have a preliminary stereotactic treatment plan created from a diagnostic brain MRI indicating the need for treatment. The preliminary plan will undergo departmental-standard physics, therapy, and quality assurance checks, spanning a total of 1-2 weeks, after which the patient will return for treatment. On the day of treatment (SRS) or start of treatment (SRT), a repeat MRI brain will be performed for planning purposes on an MRI simulator. A synthetic computed tomography (CT) scan will be generated from the new MRI. The previously generated contours and plan will be adapted to the new MRI and the fused synthetic CT. Lastly, the treatment will be delivered.

The primary objective is to assess the percentage of patients that demonstrate tumor beyond the standard planning margin (1.0mm PTV) at the time of stereotactic treatment.

An important secondary objective is to quantify local recurrence and radiation necrosis rates in patients treated with same day simulation and treatment, based on randomization to a PTV of 0mm or 1.0mm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Metastases, Adult
  • Brain Tumor - Metastatic
  • Brain Metastases From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
  • Brain Metastases From Extra-cranial Solid Tumors

Keywords

  • Brain Mets
  • Brain Metastases
  • Brain-directed stereotactic radiation
  • Brain radiation
  • Volatile Brain Metastases
  • Intracranial lesion
  • SRS
  • SRT
  • RANO
  • PTV
  • Planning Target Volume
  • Local Recurrence
  • Radiation Necrosis
  • Adaptive
  • VMAT
  • Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
  • Margin
  • Volatile
  • Rapid
  • Growth
  • Shift
  • neurocognitive
  • quality of life
  • survival
  • same day
  • randomized
03

In context

Brain Neoplasms

2,440 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Neoplasms; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 40 across 1,831 interventional studies indexed under Brain Neoplasms.

Browse Brain Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Ayal A. Aizer, MD is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participants must have a proven solid with at least one intact, residual or recurrent, intracranial lesion radiographically consistent with or proven to be a meeting one of the following criteria:

    1. Growth of 1.0mm per week or more, on average, based on the two most recent brain MRIs preceding study enrollment
    2. Abutment, to within 1.0cm, of a region of intracranial edema
    3. Proximity (within 5.0cm) to a surgical cavity created within 30 days of enrollment
    4. Proximity (within 5.0cm) to another source of physical displacement
  2. Age of at least 18 years
  3. performance status of at least 60
  4. Estimated survival of at least 3-6 months in the opinion of the enrolling clinician and/or study PI
  5. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written document by either ink on paper or a DF/HCC approved eConsent medium

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who cannot tolerate a brain MRI
  2. Patients who cannot receive gadolinium
  3. Participants with end stage renal disease
  4. Participants with widespread, definitive
  5. Pregnant women are excluded from this study because of the potential deleterious effects of gadolinium on the developing fetus. Because there is an unknown but potential risk for adverse events in nursing infants, women who are breastfeeding are not eligible for this study as well
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Leptomeningeal disease

Cancer that has spread to the leptomeninges, the thin layers covering the brain and spinal cord, and the fluid between them. It is not the same as brain metastases.

Criteria often treat it separately, and many studies leave it out even where treated brain metastases are allowed.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    0mm PTV

    0mm uncertainty margin

    Radiation: Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation for brain metastases using 0mm or 1mm PTV

  • Active comparator
    1mm PTV

    1mm uncertainty margin

    Radiation: Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation for brain metastases using 0mm or 1mm PTV

Interventions

  • RadiationLinear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation for brain metastases using 0mm or 1mm PTV

    Linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiation for brain metastases using 0mm or 1mm PTV

    Also known as: SRS, SRT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the percentage of patients that demonstrate tumor beyond the standard planning margin (1.0mm PTV) at the time of stereotactic treatment.

    Percentage of patients, based on clinical and radiographic assessment, in which the repeat same day/simulation MRI reveals tumor extending beyond a 1.0mm PTV margin of the plan developed on the diagnostic MRI (i.e. the percentage of patients for which the MRI obtained on the same or first day of treatment displays tumor extending 1.0mm beyond the extent of the tumor on the planning MRI).

    Time frame: Diagnostic MRI to MRI on first day of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival

    Clinical parameter

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  2. Death due to neurologic disease progression

    Clinical assessment via review of study visits and medical records indicating cause of death (neurologic versus non-neurologic)

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  3. Performance status

    Karnofsky performance status (KPS), assessed longitudinally. A higher score indicates better functional status and less dependence on others.

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  4. Progression free survival

    Clinical assessment of first progression after treatment

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  5. Quality of life/symptom burden and interference

    Questionnaire - MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT). Assessed longitudinally. Scored by calculating the mean of the 13 core symptom items and the mean of the 6 interference items. A 0-10 scoring scale is used, with 0 representing an item is not present and 10 representing the highest severity. An item rated 5 or higher may indicate a moderate-to-severe symptom or interference.

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  6. Neurocognitive function via Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised

    Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) scored by number of words recalled. Larger number represents better neurocognitive function. T and Z scores derived using number of words recalled

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after baseline

  7. Time to detection of new brain metastases

    Time from treatment to first appearance of new brain metastases on radiographic assessment

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  8. Time to development of radiation necrosis

    Time from treatment to first appearance of new necrosis on radiographic assessment

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  9. Time to development of leptomeningeal disease

    Time from treatment to first appearance of leptomeningeal disease on radiographic assessment

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  10. Time to local recurrence

    Time from treatment to first appearance of local recurrence on radiographic assessment

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  11. Time to salvage craniotomy

    Time from treatment to first use of craniotomy as salvage therapy

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  12. Time to additional radiotherapeutic treatments after the initial course

    Time from treatment to first use of additional radiotherapeutic treatments after the initial course

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  13. Time to the development of seizures

    Time from treatment to development of primary seizures on clinical assessment

    Time frame: Duration of time on study (estimated 1 year)

  14. Neurocognitive function via Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT)

    Trail Making Test Part A and B (TMT) scored based on time to completion of assessment. Shorter time interval reflects better neurocognitive function

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after baseline

  15. Neurocognitive function via Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT)

    Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT) scored by number of words patient can produce in one minute. Larger number of words represents better neurocognitive function

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after baseline

  16. Neurocogntive function via Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)

    Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scored by sum of components within assessment. Higher score represents better neurocognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline to 12 months after baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07132190
Lead sponsor
Ayal A. Aizer, MD
Responsible party
Ayal A. Aizer, MD (Director, Central Nervous System Radiation Oncology; Associate Professor, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2025
Start date
Dec 30, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 8, 2026

Study contacts

Ayal A Aizer, MD, MHS
Contact
aaaizer@partners.org
(617) 732-7560
Marciana F Johnson, MPH
Contact
mjohnson71@mgb.org
(617) 582-8335
Ayal A Aizer, MD, MHS
principal investigator · Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion