ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07130799CANDIRISUpdated Feb 9, 2026

Innate Immune Response Monitoring Via Monocyte HLA-DR in Severe Intra-abdominal Infections at Risk of Fungal Infection

An observational study in Intra-abdominal Infection, Critical Illness and Post-Op Infection, sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-09.

Sponsored by Central Hospital, Nancy, France · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is a frequent and severe fungal infection in critically ill patients, often diagnosed late. Its pathophysiology remains unclear, particularly regarding why some patients develop invasive infection while others only show benign colonization. A potential explanation lies in the state of innate immunity. Monocyte HLA-DR expression, a recognized marker of immune suppression in critical care, may be transiently but profoundly reduced in non-immunocompromised patients who go on to develop IAC. This observational study aims to evaluate whether patients with IAC have greater innate immune dysfunction-assessed by HLA-DR expression-compared to those with severe bacterial intra-abdominal infections. The goal is to better understand the immune mechanisms involved and improve early risk stratification for IAC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intra-abdominal Infection
  • Critical Illness
  • Post-Op Infection
  • Immunization; Sepsis
  • Candida Sepsis

Keywords

  • intra-abdominal infection
  • intra-abdominal candidiasis
  • HLA-DR
  • immunomonitoring
  • monocyte
  • critically ill patients
03

In context

Intraabdominal Infections

129 studies on the registry are indexed under Intraabdominal Infections; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 174 across 48 observational studies indexed under Intraabdominal Infections.

Browse Intraabdominal Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Central Hospital, Nancy, France is the lead sponsor of 798 studies on the registry; 186 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will include adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for severe intra-abdominal infections requiring urgent abdominal surgery. Participants must present at least one recognized risk factor for intra-abdominal candidiasis, such as recent abdominal surgery, gastrointestinal perforation, healthcare-associated infection, immunosuppression, septic shock, or recent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient (≥ 18 years old)
  • Patient admitted to the ICU or intermediate care unit for a severe intra-abdominal infection requiring urgent abdominal surgery
  • Presence of at least one risk factor for intra-abdominal candidiasis:

    • Abdominal surgery within the last 7 days
    • Supramesocolic gastrointestinal perforation
    • Healthcare-associated intra-abdominal infection
    • Community-acquired intra-abdominal infection in an patient*
    • Intra-abdominal infection complicated by septic shock
    • Broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure within 72 hours prior to surgery
  • And/or a Peritonitis Score ≥ 3 out of 4
  • Patient affiliated with or benefiting from a national health insurance system
  • Patient who has received full information about the clinical study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiologically guided drainage without surgery
  • Infected acute pancreatitis
  • Limitation or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments
  • Moribund patient with an expected \< 48 hours
  • Woman of without effective
  • Refusal to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Intra-abdominal candidiasis

    Intra-abdominal infection with intra-abdominal candidiasis based on the FUNDICU consensus

    Other: Immunomonitoring

  • Bacterial Intra-abdominal infection

    Intra-abdominal infection with a negative fungal culture

    Other: Immunomonitoring

Interventions

  • OtherImmunomonitoring

    To analyse monocyte HLA-DR expression (mHLA-DR) and CD4+ T lymphocyte count (CD4) in both group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation Between percentage of Monocyte HLA-DR Expression and the Occurrence of Intra-abdominal Candidiasis

    Assessment of the relationship between monocyte HLA-DR expression levels and the development of intra-abdominal candidiasis in critically ill patients with severe intra-abdominal infection.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after abdominal surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change Over Time in Percentage of Monocytes Expressing HLA-DR Measured by Flow Cytometry in Patients With vs Without Intra-abdominal Candidiasis

    Peripheral venous blood will be collected at Day 0 (within 6 hours after index surgery), Day 3, Day 5, and Day 7 post-surgery. Monocyte HLA-DR expression will be quantified as the percentage of CD14+/CD16-/low monocytes positive for HLA-DR using standardized flow cytometry with anti-HLA-DR monoclonal antibody. Results will be compared between patients with confirmed intra-abdominal candidiasis (peritoneal culture positive for Candida) and those with intra-abdominal infection without fungal involvement. Primary analysis: between-group difference in change from baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 in percentage of HLA-DR+ monocytes

    Time frame: From Day 0 (surgery) to Day 7 post-surgery

  2. Variation in Lymphocyte Subpopulations Based on Presence or Absence of Intra-abdominal Candidiasis

    Analysis of the changes in lymphocyte subpopulations counts (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, NK cells, B cells) in patients with versus without intra-abdominal candidiasis

    Time frame: From Day 0 (surgery) to Day 7 post-surgery

  3. Impact of Immune Dysfunction on In-Hospital Mortality

    Evaluation of the correlation between low HLA-DR expression and in-hospital mortality

    Time frame: From surgery to Day 28

  4. Impact of Immune Dysfunction on Source Control of Infection

    Assessment of whether immune dysfunction (defined by a low expression level of HLA-DR) is associated with failure or delay in achieving effective surgical or medical source control of the intra-abdominal infection

    Time frame: Up to 28 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Nov 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 9 months after the start.

Of 24 observational studies under Intraabdominal Infections, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 24, 2025
First posted
Aug 19, 2025
StartActual
Nov 14, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2027
Last update
Feb 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07130799
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 19, 2025
Start date
Nov 14, 2025
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 9, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion