ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07129798Updated Oct 21, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Myopic Macular Hole Closure Surgery Without Endotamponade Agent

An interventional study of ILM flap with no endotamponade technique in Macular Hole and Myopia, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Aug 2025).
Updated Oct 21, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Macular hole (MH) is a common condition that affects approximately 1.6/1000 elderly Chinese population. The prevalence is expected to be even higher in individuals with high myopia (HM), an established risk factor for MH. Without prompt surgical intervention, it can lead to irreversible vision loss and retinal detachment. Standard MH surgery involves pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM peeling), followed by endotamponade agents to appose the MH edge.

Office of Research and Knowledge Transfer Services

Common endotamponade agents include intraocular long-acting gas and silicone oil. The use of endotamponade has its limitations, for example, impairing vision, the need for strict posturing and avoid air travel in the early postoperative period. Ocular complications, such as uveitis, cataract and glaucoma may arise.

To overcome these shortcomings, a novel technique to close MH without endotamponade agents was proposed by a group from Poland. Using viscoelastics to stabilize ILM flap over the MH, negating the need and limitations of endotamponade agents. However, this case series is limited by its small sample size (12 eyes) and lack of patients with pathological myopia (PH).

PH is prevalent in the Asian population and myopic MH tend to have lower surgical success rate due to antero-posterior traction from posterior staphyloma and long axial length associated with PH. There is currently a gap in evidence whether this novel surgical technique could benefit eyes with myopic MH. The investigators plan to conduct a prospective interventional case series to establish the efficacy and safety of myopic MH closure using this novel surgical technique.

Read the detailed description

Macular hole (MH) is a common condition that affects approximately 1.6/1000 elderly Chinese population. The prevalence is expected to be even higher in individuals with high myopia (HM), an established risk factor for MH. Without prompt surgical intervention, it can lead to irreversible vision loss and retinal detachment. Standard MH surgery involves pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM peeling), followed by endotamponade agents to appose the MH edge.

Common endotamponade agents include intraocular long-acting gas and silicone oil. The use of endotamponade has its limitations, for example, impairing vision, the need for strict posturing and avoid air travel in the early postoperative period. Ocular complications, such as uveitis, cataract and glaucoma may arise.

To overcome these shortcomings, a novel technique to close MH without endotamponade agents was proposed by a group from Poland. Using viscoelastics to stabilize ILM flap over the MH, negating the need and limitations of endotamponade agents. However, this case series is limited by its small sample size (12 eyes) and lack of patients with pathological myopia (PH).

PH is prevalent in the Asian population and myopic MH tend to have lower surgical success rate due to antero-posterior traction from posterior staphyloma and long axial length associated with PH. There is currently a gap in evidence whether this novel surgical technique could benefit eyes with myopic MH. The investigators plan to conduct a prospective interventional case series to establish the efficacy and safety of myopic MH closure using this novel surgical technique.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macular Hole
  • Myopia

Keywords

  • Macular hole
  • High Myopia
  • Vitrectomy
  • Internal limiting membrane flap
  • No endotamponade
03

In context

Retinal Perforations

139 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Perforations; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 94 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Perforations.

Browse Retinal Perforations studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years or above
  • Patients with full thickness macular hole, defined as full thickness foveal defect on OCT
  • Patients with pathological myopia, defined as refractive error of \</= -6.0D or axial length >/= 26.0mm with signs of posterior staphyloma, lacquer cracks or chorizo-retinal atrophy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with concomitant retinal detachment
  • Prior MH surgery
  • Macular conditions other than MH, such as myopic choroidal neovascularization, age related macular degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Patients who cannot be cooperative with ophthalmic examination or give to undergo surgery
  • Fellow eye already recruited in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ILM flap with no endotamponade technique

    Patients with myopic macular hole (MH) will undergo pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and the internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap with no gas tamponade technique to repair the MH.

    Procedure: ILM flap with no endotamponade technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureILM flap with no endotamponade technique

    Standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy will be performed under either local anesthesia or general anesthesia. After core vitrectomy, posterior vitreous detachment induction will be done using vitrectomy cutter suction with the staining of intravitreal triamcinolone if necessary. This is followed by staining of the ILM with ILM blue dye. A half-moon shaped temporal ILM flap will be created, bridging the MH, using an end-gripping intraocular forceps. The posterior pole would be filled with perfluorocarbon (PFC) liquid and cohesive viscoelastic will be injected under the PFC to stabilize the ILM flap over the MH. Removal of PFC and search for peripheral retinal breaks will be done before removal of vitrectomy trocars and closure of sclerotomies wounds. Surgery will be combined with cataract removal (phacoemulsification) with intraocular lens implantation if patients have visually significant cataract. No specific post-operative posture will be required.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Macular hole closure rate

    Defined as closure of MH on optical coherence tomography (OCT)

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-operative best-corrected visual acuity

    BCVA

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. MH closure pattern

    Grading of MH closure pattern based on OCT

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hong Kong Eye Hospital
    Kowloon, Hong Kong
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Szeto SKH, Yu AHY, Tsang CW, Mohamed S, Chen LJ, Lai TYY. COMPLEX MACULAR HOLE CLOSURE BY TEMPORAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP WITHOUT ENDOTAMPONADE. Retina. 2024 Nov 1;44(11):1915-1922. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004201. PubMed 39436300 ↗
  • Szeto SKH, Lam JTW, Yu AHY, Pang CMK, Lin TPH, Hui VWK, Tsang KK, Chan JCK, Chen LJ, Lai TYY, Mohamed S, Tsang CW. Macular Hole Closure by Internal Limiting Membrane Flap without Gas Tamponade versus Conventional Surgery: A Comparative Study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2025 Nov;9(11):1034-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2025.06.005. Epub 2025 Jun 13. PubMed 40518116 ↗
  • Stopa M, Ciesielski M, Rakowicz P. Macular Hole Closure Without Endotamponade Application. Retina. 2023 Apr 1;43(4):688-691. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002850. Epub 2020 May 25. PubMed 32453068 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Need organizational approval

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 21, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 24, 2026→Nov 30, 2025 (actual)
Oct 21, 2026
Study completion
Dec 26, 2026→Nov 30, 2025 (actual)
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Dec 24, 2026→Nov 30, 2025 (now actual)
    Study completion Dec 26, 2026→Nov 30, 2025 (now actual)

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07129798
Responsible party
Simon KH Szeto (Assistant Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2025
Start date
Jan 18, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2025
Completion
Nov 30, 2025
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Simon KH Szeto, MBChB, FRCOphth
principal investigator · Chinese University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion