CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07125781Updated Aug 15, 2025

Central Sensitization and Nociplastic Pain in Pes Planus

An observational study in Pes Planus, Flatfoot and Central Sensitization, sponsored by Bozok University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-15.

Sponsored by Bozok University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
214
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Pes planus, commonly known as flatfoot, is a condition characterized by the collapse of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. While some individuals remain asymptomatic, many experience foot or leg pain, walking difficulties, and functional limitations. In some cases, symptoms persist despite adequate conventional treatment. This suggests that central pain mechanisms, such as central sensitization and nociplastic pain, may contribute to ongoing symptoms. These mechanisms involve changes in the central nervous system that amplify pain perception and can occur even in the absence of active tissue damage. Understanding these mechanisms in pes planus may help guide more targeted and effective treatment strategies.

Purpose:

The aim of this multicenter cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of central sensitization and nociplastic pain in individuals with clinically diagnosed pes planus and to compare the findings with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.

Methods:

Between November 2024 and May 2025, a total of 107 patients with pes planus and 107 healthy controls were recruited from three medical centers. Participants completed validated Turkish versions of the Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, the Foot Function Index for functional limitation, the Pain-DETECT questionnaire for nociplastic pain symptoms, the Central Sensitization Inventory for central sensitization, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for psychological distress, and the Short Form-12 for quality of life. Data were analyzed using comparative statistical tests and multiple linear regression models to identify factors associated with nociplastic pain and central sensitization in the pes planus group.

Read the detailed description

Pes planus, also referred to as flatfoot, is a common musculoskeletal condition characterized by the flattening or collapse of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot. It affects a considerable portion of the adult population and may be associated with foot pain, functional impairment, and reduced quality of life. In many patients, pain symptoms persist despite adequate structural correction and conventional treatments such as footwear modifications, orthotic support, exercise, or anti-inflammatory medications. This persistence suggests that central mechanisms of pain processing may be involved.

Central sensitization is a phenomenon in which the central nervous system exhibits heightened responsiveness to sensory input, resulting in amplified pain perception even in the absence of ongoing tissue injury. Nociplastic pain is a relatively new classification describing pain arising from altered central nociceptive processing without clear evidence of tissue damage or nerve injury. Both mechanisms are increasingly recognized in chronic musculoskeletal disorders, yet they have been underexplored in individuals with pes planus.

This multicenter cross-sectional study was designed to investigate the prevalence of central sensitization and nociplastic pain in adults with clinically diagnosed pes planus and to compare these findings with healthy controls matched for age and sex. Participants were recruited from three medical centers between November 2024 and May 2025. Inclusion criteria required adults aged 18 to 65 years with lower extremity pain lasting at least six months and a diagnosis of pes planus confirmed by a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist. Healthy controls had no history of foot or leg pain or relevant musculoskeletal disorders.

All participants completed standardized and validated assessment tools, including the Visual Analog Scale for pain intensity, the Foot Function Index for foot-related disability, the Pain-DETECT questionnaire for nociplastic pain features, the Central Sensitization Inventory for signs of central sensitization, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for psychological distress, and the Short Form-12 for quality of life. Demographic and clinical information was also recorded.

Statistical analyses compared results between the pes planus and control groups and examined correlations among pain severity, functional impairment, central sensitization, nociplastic pain, and psychological measures. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify independent predictors of nociplastic pain and central sensitization in the pes planus group.

The findings of this study are intended to improve understanding of the complex pain mechanisms associated with pes planus and to highlight the potential need for multidisciplinary management approaches that address central pain processes and psychological factors alongside conventional biomechanical interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pes Planus
  • Flatfoot
  • Central Sensitization
  • Nociplastic Pain

Keywords

  • Pes Planus
  • Flatfoot
  • Central Sensitization Inventory
  • Nociplastic Pain
  • Pain-DETECT Questionnaire
  • Foot Function Index
  • Chronic Foot Pain
  • Biopsychosocial Pain Mechanisms
03

In context

Flatfoot

168 studies on the registry are indexed under Flatfoot; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 214 is above the median of 49 across 44 observational studies indexed under Flatfoot.

Browse Flatfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

Bozok University is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults aged 18-65 years, including individuals with clinically diagnosed pes planus and age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers without lower extremity pain. Participants were recruited from physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics at Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Gynecology and Pediatrics Training and Research Hospital, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, and Yozgat City Hospital.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years.
  • For pes planus group: clinically diagnosed pes planus confirmed by physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists, with persistent lower extremity pain for at least 6 months.
  • For control group: age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers without current or past foot or leg pain.
  • Willingness to complete all self-report questionnaires.
  • Provided written and verbal informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, malignancy, vasculitis, neuropathies, or lumbar radiculopathy.
  • History of lower limb surgery or trauma.
  • Recent local injection or extracorporeal shockwave therapy.
  • Any rheumatologic disease affecting pain perception (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis).
  • Severe psychiatric disorder or cognitive impairment interfering with questionnaire completion.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
214 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • the patient group

    Adults aged 18 to 65 years with a clinical diagnosis of pes planus confirmed by a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist, experiencing lower extremity pain for at least six months. Participants completed validated questionnaires to assess pain intensity, foot function, nociplastic pain features, central sensitization, psychological status, and quality of life. No therapeutic intervention was administered as part of the study.

  • The control group

    Age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers with no current or past foot or leg pain. Participants had no history of pes planus, lower limb surgery, trauma, or rheumatologic, neurologic, endocrine, or vascular disorders that could influence pain perception. No interventions were applied; they completed the same validated questionnaires as the pes planus group for comparison purposes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain-DETECT questionnaire

    The Pain-DETECT questionnaire consists of 9 items with a total score range of 1-38. Scores ≤12 indicate that neuropathic or nociplastic pain components are unlikely, 13-18 indicate uncertainty, and ≥19 indicate probable nociplastic or neuropathic pain. The validated Turkish version, developed by Alkan et al. (2013), demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 67.5% for the ≤12 cutoff, with a negative predictive value of 87%.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Central Sensitization Inventory

    The Central Sensitization Inventory contains 25 items scored 0-4 (0 = never, 4 = always). Total scores ≥40 indicate the presence of central sensitization, with severity categories as follows: 0-29 subclinical, 30-39 mild, 40-49 moderate, 50-59 severe, ≥60 very severe. The validated Turkish version, developed by Keleş et al. (2021), reported 81% sensitivity and 75% specificity for the ≥40 cutoff, with excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93).

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    The Visual Analog Scale is a 10 cm horizontal line anchored with "0 = no pain" and "10 = very severe pain." Participants mark their pain severity at rest and during activity for each foot. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Foot Function Index

    The Foot Function Index consists of 23 items across three subscales: pain (9 items), disability (9 items), and activity limitation (5 items). Each item is scored using a 10 cm visual analog scale reflecting the previous week's foot condition. Higher scores indicate greater impairment. The Turkish version was adapted and validated by Yalıman et al., with cultural and linguistic modifications for plantar fasciitis patients.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale contains 14 items, split evenly into anxiety and depression subscales, each scored 0-21. Interpretation: 0-7 = normal, 8-10 = mild, 11-14 = moderate, 15-21 = severe. The validated Turkish version was developed by Aydemir et al. (1997).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12)

    The Short Form-12 assesses physical and mental components of health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The validated Turkish version was established in 2022 by Soylu and Kütük.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Yozgat, Yozgat 66100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alkan H, Ardic F, Erdogan C, Sahin F, Sarsan A, Findikoglu G. Turkish version of the painDETECT questionnaire in the assessment of neuropathic pain: a validity and reliability study. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14(12):1933-43. doi: 10.1111/pme.12222. Epub 2013 Aug 7. PubMed 23924395 ↗
  • Buldys K, Gornicki T, Kalka D, Szuster E, Biernikiewicz M, Markuszewski L, Sobieszczanska M. What Do We Know about Nociplastic Pain? Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 17;11(12):1794. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121794. PubMed 37372912 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article (after deidentification) will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the aims stated in their proposal. Requests should be directed to gulserendmr58@hotmail.com. Data will be available for 12 months following article publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07125781
Lead sponsor
Bozok University
Responsible party
Gulseren Demir Karakilic (Assistant Professor, Principal Investigator, Bozok University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
Start date
Nov 27, 2024
Primary completion
May 31, 2025
Completion
May 31, 2025
Last update
Aug 15, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion