ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07125092LIP'EXUpdated Aug 15, 2025

A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Benefit and Safety of Medical Compression Garments in the Management of Patients With Lipedema

An interventional study of compression group in Lipoedema, sponsored by Thuasne. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-15.

Sponsored by Thuasne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lipedema (LI) is a chronic condition, painful disease characterized by a disproportionate increase in adipose tissue and pain in women's legs and sometimes arms. Its prevalence is largely unknown, but lipedema is estimated to affect 0.06% to 11% of the female population. Even though this pathology is increasingly studied and working groups are collaborating to harmonize criteria, a crucial underlying problem of lipedema is the variability in identifying lipedema. Lipedema patients often suffer from obesity, physical disability and psychological impairments, and the effects on quality of life are significant. Almost all women with lipedema are dissatisfied with the disproportionality of their body and the stigma associated with it. In addition to weight gain, pain is one of the major symptoms of this pathology, but also limb heaviness, weakness, or difficulties with walking. Patients also tend to develop easy bruising, although these symptoms are not always present. Treatment of lipedema is aimed at relieving pain, maintaining/improving mobility, reducing volume of the limbs, and improving quality of life. It is important to note that compression therapy is one of the cornerstones of this treatment because of its anti-inflammatory effect on adipose tissue

Read the detailed description

Wearing compression stockings leads to a significant reduction in oxidative stress, a finding that also indicates improved microcirculation in the subcutaneous tissue. Wearing compression stockings may relieve pain and may improve the ability of patients to move. In this context, the hypothesis is that the treatment of lipedema patients with compression stockings contributes to the reduction of lipedema-associated symptoms such as pain and heaviness and thus contributes to a better quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lipoedema

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • lipoedema
  • compression
  • pain
  • quality of life
03

In context

Lipedema

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Lipedema; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 35 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Lipedema.

Browse Lipedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Thuasne is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Lipedema diagnosed at least in the legs according to the initial Wold criteria modified by Herbst.
  • Average pain in the legs over the last week ≥ 4 points on a 10 points Numerical Rating Scale visual analogue scale.
  • Patient who has given his freely and signed it prior to any intervention in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient for whom compression is , such as untreated infections, skin irritation or lesions.
  • Lipedema type I: Hips/buttocks.
  • Patients who underwent liposuction.
  • Patient with a WHtR higher than 0,58.
  • Patient with active cancer, chemotherapy treatment, chronic inflammatory disease, chronic anti-inflammatory therapy (ex: TNF alpha).
  • Patient with surgery scheduled/planned during the study period.
  • Patient with a known allergy to the components used in the devices.
  • Pregnant woman or woman of childbearing age without .
  • Patient currently participating in another clinical investigation that could impact the study endpoints.
  • Patient with psychiatric, psychological, or neurological disorders that are incompatible with the proper follow-up of the clinical investigation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Compression group

    Compression device group: All patients enrolled in the study will be instructed to wear the compression garment for 8 weeks, as long as possible during the day. In parallel, all patients will receive the same advice about routine care: physical exercises, nutrition aspect that are part of the centre's current practice.

    Device: compression group

Interventions

  • Devicecompression group

    All patients enrolled in the study will be instructed to wear the compression garment for 8 weeks, as long as possible during the day. In parallel, all patients will receive the same advice about routine care: physical exercises, nutrition aspect that are part of the centre's current practice. 3 study visits are planned: the inclusion visit (V0) includes patient information and consent signature, measurements for custom-made compression stockings. The initial visit (V1) includes devices collection and fitting, patient questionnaires, physician assessment (medical and lipedema history, BMI, WHtR, blood sample collection, pain description, lipedema associated symptoms, leg perimeter measurements, Moisture Meter, pressure under the garment). The follow-up visit (V2) after 8 weeks includes: patient questionnaires and physician assessment. After 8 weeks, another compression garment will be given to the patient with a new satisfaction e-questionnaire at 10 weeks of follow-up.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of pain: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The evolution of perceived leg pain (mean and maximum) related to lipedema is measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). 0 corresponds to no pain and 10 to the maximum pain.

    Time frame: Weekly between baseline and 8 weeks of follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evolution of pain threshold under pressure (algometer)

    The pain threshold under pressure is measured by an algometer. It is a non-invasive and painless instrument that consists of a dial, a cylinder attached to the dial, and a rod inside the cylinder, which ends in a 1 cm2 rubber tip.

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  2. Quality of life (QoL): Patient's opinion on Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

    The patient's impression of overall change is measured by the Patient's opinion on Global Impression of Change questionnaire (PGI-C). The scale has 7 levels of response : "no change or condition has got worse" that is the worst outcome (= 1 point) "almost the same, hardly any change at all" (= 2 points); "a little better , but no noticeable change" (= 3 points); "somewhat better, but the change has not made any real difference" (= 4 points); "moderately better, and a slight but noticeable change" (= 5 points); "better, and a definite improvement that has made a real and worthwhile difference (=6 points); "A great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the diiference" (=7 points). The highest score corresponds to the most improvement in quality of life.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Evolution of quality of life (QoL): the Patient Benefit Index (PBI-L)

    The evolution of QoL related to the lipedema is measured by the PBI-L self-questionnaire. It consists of 23 questions about different area: quality of life, physical, psychological. It consists of 2 questionnaires : before therapy and after therapy. The patient rates the extent to which the treatment objectives have been achieved. Questions are scaled from 0 'not important at all' to 4 'very important' with a response option 'does not apply to me'.

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  4. Evolution of lipedema-associated symptoms: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    The evolution of swelling, tightness, discomfort, heaviness, skin suppleness, fatigue due to lipedema is measured by NRS : 0 corresponds to no symptom and 10 to maximum symptom

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  5. Evolution of limb volume : tape perimeter measurements

    The evolution of limb volume is measured by tape perimeter measurements taken from the dorsum of the foot and repeated for every 4 cm proximally until the root of the limb.

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  6. Evolution of skin tissue moisture : Moisture Meter

    Changes in skin tissue moisture content are assessed by the Moisture Meter (Delfin Technologies Ltd, Finland).

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  7. Garment pressure : PicoPress

    The pressure under the garment is measured by the Picopress. The PicoPress instrument is a portable digital gauge that measures the pressure exerted by a garment. The pressure detected by the transducer is displayed in Newton.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks of follow-up

  8. Evolution of inflammatory biological biomarker : C-reactive protein

    The evolution of inflammatory biological biomarker : C-reactive protein (CRP) is measured from blood sample collection. The rate will be evaluated in milligrams per liter

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  9. Evolution of fat distribution: Waist to hip ratio

    The evolution of fat distribution is calculated via the Waist-to-hip Ratio (WHR= waist circumference / hip circumference) and the Waist-to-Height-Ratio (WHtR= waist circumference / height).

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  10. Evolution of weight: BMI

    The evolution of Body Mass Index (BMI) is calculated via the ratio Weight/(Size)2

    Time frame: From baseline to 8 weeks of follow-up

  11. Device safety

    The safety of the device is assessed by describing the adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) that occur throughout the study.

    Time frame: From baseline to 10 weeks

  12. Compliance to treatment

    The compliance to treatment (day and night) is reported by the physician according to the patient diary. The compliance is measured in average number of days that the device is worn.

    Time frame: From baseline to 10 weeks

  13. Satisfaction about the device

    Patient's satisfaction with regards to the device is measured by a specific self-questionnaire given to the patient. The questionnaire is mainly focused on product positioning, comfort, stiffness with a 4 level-answer (example: very satisfied, satisfied, unsatisfied, very unsatisfied).

    Time frame: 8 weeks, 10 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alwardat N, Di Renzo L, Alwardat M, Romano L, De Santis GL, Gualtieri P, Carrano E, Nocerino P, De Lorenzo A. The effect of lipedema on health-related quality of life and psychological status: a narrative review of the literature. Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Aug;25(4):851-856. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00703-x. Epub 2019 May 6. PubMed 31062201 ↗
  • Esmer M, Schingale FJ, Unal D, Yazici MV, Guzel NA. Physiotherapy and rehabilitation applications in lipedema management: A literature review. Lymphology. 2020;53(2):88-95. PubMed 33190432 ↗
  • Forner-Cordero I, Forner-Cordero A, Szolnoky G. Update in the management of lipedema. Int Angiol. 2021 Aug;40(4):345-357. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04604-6. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PubMed 33870676 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Sep 2026, 12 months later.

Of 29 interventional studies with no phase under Lipedema, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 28, 2025
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
StartEst.
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 30, 2026
Last update
Aug 15, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07125092
Lead sponsor
Thuasne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 15, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 15, 2025

Study contacts

Isabel FORNER CORDERO, MD
Contact
fornrcordero@gmail.com
961 24 40 00 ext. +34
Astrid PICOLET
Contact
etudescliniques@thuasne.fr

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion