CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05716165FOOTEX60-80Updated Feb 24, 2025

Effect of Proprioceptive Knee Braces on the Performance and Endurance of Recreational Soccer Players Aged 60-80 Years

An interventional study of proprioceptive knee braces and No knee brace in Healthy Volunteers, sponsored by Thuasne. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-24.

Sponsored by Thuasne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
60 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of wearing bilateral proprioceptive knee braces on the endurance of subjects aged 60 to 80 years.

Read the detailed description

Sporting activity has proven health benefits, particularly for older adults, whose balance and neuromuscular functions decline with age.

On the other hand, physical activity in the elderly population may be hampered by inadequate physical condition, muscle or proprioceptive deficits, or fear of falling or injuring. A proprioceptive knee brace could therefore make physical activity safer and thus improve performance, balance, and ultimately the quality of life of the participants.

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of wearing bilateral proprioceptive knee braces on the endurance of subjects aged 60 to 80 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • knee brace
  • soccer
  • aged
  • Exercise
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Thuasne is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject practicing recreational soccer
  • Subject included in the LIBM (inter-university laboratory of motor biology) study: "Effect of recreational soccer practice in persons aged 60 to 80 years"
  • Patient whose knee measurements are compatible with the knee brace sizes
  • Patient who has signed a free and informed consent form
  • Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security plan

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any of the contraindications to the use of the knee brace, as indicated in the instructions for use
  • Patient with a major cognitive impairment incompatible with participation in a clinical trial
  • Patient participating in another clinical investigation conducted to establish the conformity of a device impacting the judgment criteria
  • Vulnerable patient according to article L1121-6 of the public health code, person subject to a legal protection measure or unable to consent freely
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    self-comparison

    Volunteers will be asked to wear a knee brace on each limb during one of the training sessions. At the end of this training session, a questionnaire will be given to the volunteer to evaluate knee stability, range of motion, confidence when walking, and fear of falling. The volunteers will then have to participate in 2 test sessions: one with and one without knee braces. The patient will perform tests (Unipodal balance on flat ground, 30s chair stand test, 2,5m up and go test, 6 min-walk) with and without the proprioceptive knee brace in a randomized order. At the end of the tests with and without knee brace, a questionnaire will be given to the volunteer to evaluate the stability of the knee, the range of motion, the confidence when walking, the fear of falling, as well as a satisfaction questionnaire about the device. There is also a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the proprioceptive knee brace to be completed at the end of the study.

    Device: proprioceptive knee braces · Device: No knee brace

Interventions

  • Deviceproprioceptive knee braces

    The patient will perform the tests with the knee braces.

  • DeviceNo knee brace

    The patient will perform the tests without the knee brace.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the effect of bilateral proprioceptive knee braces on the endurance of subjects compared to without knee brace.

    The evaluation of the subjects' endurance corresponds to the difference in results obtained during the 6-minutes walk test in the absence and presence of knee braces.

    Time frame: week 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the impact of knee braces on balance compared to without knee brace.

    Balance will be evaluated via 2 tests: * An unipodal balance test performed on flat ground, eyes open and eyes closed, and the result of the test compared in the absence and presence of knee braces. * A bipodal test to objectively measure balance, performed on a force platform with eyes open and eyes closed, to determine the projection of the subject's centre of pressure for 30 seconds. The results of the test will be compared in the absence and presence of knee pads.

    Time frame: week 1

  2. Evaluate the impact of knee braces on lower limb strength compared to without knee brace.

    The strength of the lower limbs will be evaluated via the 30s chair stand test and the result of the test compared in the absence and presence of knee braces.

    Time frame: week 1

  3. Evaluate the impact of knee braces on walking speed compared to without knee brace.

    Walking speed and agility will be evaluated during the 2.5m up and go test and the test result compared in the absence and presence of knee braces.

    Time frame: week 1

  4. Evaluate the impact of knee braces on the volunteer's feelings about the stability of his knees, their range of motion, his confidence when walking and his fear of falling after the tests and after the training

    The feeling of the volunteer will be evaluated via a questionnaire on the stability of the knee, the amplitude of movement, the confidence during the walk and the fear of falling felt after the tests and after the training

    Time frame: week 1, week 2

  5. Evaluate the influence of the functional capacity of the knees of each volunteer at inclusion on the various performance parameters measured

    The functional capacity of the knees at inclusion will be assessed via the Lysholm questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 0

  6. Evaluate the satisfaction of the volunteers with the device

    The volunteers' satisfaction with the system will be evaluated via a specific satisfaction questionnaire.

    Time frame: Last visit

  7. Evaluate the tolerance of the knee braces

    Tolerance will be evaluated through the collection of adverse events following the wearing of knee braces

    Time frame: week 1, week 2

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Saint-Etienne Jean Monnet University
    Saint-Etienne, 42270, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Baltaci G, Aktas G, Camci E, Oksuz S, Yildiz S, Kalaycioglu T. The effect of prophylactic knee bracing on performance: balance, proprioception, coordination, and muscular power. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Oct;19(10):1722-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1491-3. Epub 2011 Apr 6. PubMed 21468615 ↗
  • Bean JF, Vora A, Frontera WR. Benefits of exercise for community-dwelling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jul;85(7 Suppl 3):S31-42; quiz S43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.010. PubMed 15221722 ↗
  • Buchner DM, Cress ME, de Lateur BJ, Esselman PC, Margherita AJ, Price R, Wagner EH. The effect of strength and endurance training on gait, balance, fall risk, and health services use in community-living older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997 Jul;52(4):M218-24. doi: 10.1093/gerona/52a.4.m218. PubMed 9224433 ↗
  • Osoba MY, Rao AK, Agrawal SK, Lalwani AK. Balance and gait in the elderly: A contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb 4;4(1):143-153. doi: 10.1002/lio2.252. eCollection 2019 Feb. PubMed 30828632 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05716165
Lead sponsor
Thuasne
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2023
Start date
Feb 14, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2024
Completion
Apr 12, 2024
Last update
Feb 24, 2025

Study contacts

Roger OULLION, MD
principal investigator · Saint-Etienne Jean Monnet University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion