ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07120659MeCNeckUpdated Dec 11, 2025

Vacuum Massage vs Tactile Massage for the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of soft touch massage and vacuum massage in Chronic Neck Pain, sponsored by University of Tromso. Recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by University of Tromso · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic pain significantly impacts individuals and society, with about 30% of Norwegian adults affected, making it the leading cause of long-term sick leave and disability benefits. Concerns over addiction to pain medications highlight the need for non-pharmacological treatments, though many such therapies, often complementary or alternative, are not widely available in conventional healthcare. Unclear biomechanisms of these therapies pose challenges for clinical trials and acceptance.

This pilot study aims to explore the effects of two types of massage-cupping massage (CM, intense) and tactile massage (TM, soft)-on chronic neck pain, focusing on their mechanisms of action. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) will be used as a biomarker to assess changes in the pain pathway. A previous feasibility study on CM and QST conducted in Germany informs this research.

The study will recruit 60 patients with chronic neck pain, randomized to CM or TM, with six weekly treatment sessions. QST will be measured before and after treatment to understand therapy-induced changes in the pain pathway. Findings will help tailor massage therapies to individual needs, improve clinical trial quality, and promote the integration of non-pharmacological treatments into conventional care, benefiting a large population in need.

Read the detailed description

Chronic pain imposes a severe burden for the individuals suffering from it as well as for society. A report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health from April 2019 summarizes that "Chronic pain affects about 30 per cent of the adult Norwegian population and is the most common reason for long-term sick leave and disability benefit". At the same time there is increasing awareness, that the potential for addiction for some of the pain medications has become a serious public health challenge as well. Thus, there is an urgent need for non-pharmacological interventions, however, most of these interventions belong to the spectrum of complementary and alternative medicine and are often not available through the conventional healthcare system. The fact that the biomechanisms for many of these therapies are unclear, imposes a challenge for the conduction of clinical trials as well as for the acceptance of theses complementary therapies. Thus, the aim of this randomized controlled pilot study is to investigate the effect of massage on chronic neck pain with regard to their mechanism of action. Two types of massage, cupping massage (CM, intense) vs tactile massage (TM, soft) are compared, which differ regarding the intensity of skin receptor stimulation. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) of the pain pathway will be used as a psychophysiological, mechanistic biomarker. Complete QST has rarely been used to evaluate complementary therapies for chronic pain, however a NFR funded feasibility pilot study (case series) on cupping massage and QST has recently been conducted in Jena, Germany, by this group of applicants. The current study will produce pilot data on QST that can be used for sample size estimation in a future clinical trial. A total of n=60 patients with chronic neck pain will be recruited and randomized to either CM or TM. Patients will receive a total of 6 treatment sessions once per week. QST will be measured before and after the treatment. Since QST can describe therapy induced changes in the neuronal pain pathway, it will contribute fundamentally to our understanding of the mechanisms of action of massage and related interventions. This will i) help to tailor massage therapy to the individual needs of patients and thus improve care ii) which will in turn enhance the quality of clinical trials and iii) foster the acceptance of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of pain, which may iv) support their integration into conventional care and make these therapies available for the rather large population in need.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • chronic neck pain
  • massage
  • soft touch massage
  • vacuum massage
  • cupping
  • quantitative sensory testing QST
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,360 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 1,116 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Tromso is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • suffer from non-specific neck pain persisting at least 3 months
  • mean pain intensity ≥ 50 on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (NRS) with "0" meaning "no pain" and "100" meaning "worst pain imaginable"

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological symptoms
  • having had a vertebral column surgery less than 12 months prior to the study,
  • have received TENS, acupuncture, osteopathy, or a chiropractic maneuver or infiltration at the area within 4 weeks prior to the inclusion in the study
  • suffer from a congenital deformation of the spine.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intense skin stimulation

    A vacuum pump provides a type of suction similar to cupping inducing intense manipulation of the skin. The vacuum can be adjusted according to applied suction and air flow. The participant will receive 6 therapy sessions of vacuum massage.

    Other: vacuum massage

  • Active comparator
    Light skin stimulation

    Tactile massage (soft touch) is a soft superficial massage which follows the anatomy of the body without penetrating into the deeper tissues. The participants will receive 6 therapy sessions.

    Other: soft touch massage

Interventions

  • Othersoft touch massage

    Soft superficial massage which follows the anatomy of the body without penetrating into the deeper tissues

    Also known as: tactile massage

  • Othervacuum massage

    Intense stimulation through suction of the skin and deeper layers

    Also known as: cupping massage

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST)

    Sensory testing will be performed according to the standard protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) and all measurements will be carried out by the same examiner at a defined point of the trapezius muscle on the site with the worst pain, and the foot and the hand as reference areas (norms exist for hand, foot, back and face).

    Time frame: The measurement will take about 2 hours in total; pre and post intervention (5-6 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical pain scale

    ranging from 0="no pain" to 100mm="worst pain imaginable"

    Time frame: Takes about 20 seconds for the numeric rating scale; pre vs. post intervention (ca. 5-6 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. pain diary

    daily characterisation of pain including medication

    Time frame: 5-6 weeks, 3-5 min / day

  2. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Measures how neck pain has affects the patient's ability to manage in everyday life.

    Time frame: ca 6-10 min before and after the intervention (ca. 5-6 weeks)

  3. DN4 (Douleur Neuropathique 4) questionnaire

    diagnostic tool used to identify and assess neuropathic pain

    Time frame: 10 min, before & after intervention (5-6 weeks)

  4. SF-36 health survey

    Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: ca. 5-10 min, before and after intervention period (5-6 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Institute of Community Medicine, National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, NAFKAM
    Tromsø, Troms 9013, Norway
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study is a small pilot study conducted in only one center in Tromso. Thus, there is no need to share individual participant data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 26 months after the start.

Of 763 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 26 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 772 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2025
First posted
Aug 13, 2025
StartActual
Oct 27, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Dec 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07120659
Lead sponsor
University of Tromso
Responsible party
Frauke Musial (Professor, University of Tromso) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2025
Start date
Oct 27, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Study contacts

Frauke Musial, Ph.d.
Contact
frauke.musial@uit.no
+47 45860762
Solveig Johansson, MS
Contact
solveig.johansson@uit.no
+47 77646867

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion