An observational study in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.
Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Observational
This will be a multi-center registry for patients with B-ALL. Patient data will be collected both retrospectively and prospectively. The data forms and surveys will be built and managed through REDCap, a secure web application managed by the Clinical \& Translational Science Institute.
B-cell Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is a potentially curable malignancy in the pediatric population. In contrast, the outcomes of adults with B-ALL have remained historically poor due to risk of relapse after frontline therapy. Novel agents in the current era have changed the treatment landscape of adults with relapsed/refractory B-ALL with improved tolerability and better outcomes [1]. Currently, blinatumomab (CD3-CD19 bispecific molecule) and inotuzumab (CD22 antibody drug conjugate) are approved for the management of patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL. With the superior efficacy of these agents, recent clinical trials have focused on incorporating them in the management of newly diagnosed B-ALL.
A phase 3 randomized clinical trial (E1910) has recently demonstrated the superiority of adding blinatumomab during consolidation for patients who have achieved MRD negative CR [2]. Patients between the ages of 30 and 70 with newly diagnosed BCR-ABL1 negative B-ALL were enrolled and initially received 2.5 months of combination induction chemo utilizing a BFM-like regimen adapted from the E2993/UKALLXII clinical trial with extended remission induction, addition of pegasparginase for patients \<55 years of age and addition of rituximab for CD20 positive patients. Subsequently, their remission and MRD status were determined centrally by 6-color flow cytometry with MRD negativity defined as \<0.01%. All patients were then randomized to receive an additional four cycles of consolidation chemo or two cycles of blin for 28 days each cycle followed by 3 cycles of consolidation chemo, another 4-week cycle of blinatumomab (3rd cycle of blinatumomab) followed by an additional cycle of chemo and then a 4th cycle of blinatumomab. Two hundred and twenty-four MRD negative patients were randomized, 112 pts to each arm. Among the MRD negative patients, superior overall survival was seen in patients who received blinatumomab (median OS: not reached vs. 71.4 months; Hazard ratio 0.42, 95% CI: 0.24 - 0.75; two-sided p=0.003) with a median follow-up of 43 months.
While the results are encouraging and practice changing to consider adding blinatumomab to MRD negative CR patients, the backbone chemotherapy regimen used in E1910 study is not a commonly used regimen in clinical practice. Due to the unmet need, physicians are often considering combining blinatumomab consolidation with several other commonly used chemotherapy regimens. However, the outcome in this setting remains unknown. Our goal in this study is to evaluate the real-world utilization of blinatumomab in the frontline setting for management of B-ALL in the United States.
392 studies on the registry are indexed under Burkitt Lymphoma; 114 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 300 across 25 observational studies indexed under Burkitt Lymphoma.
Browse Burkitt Lymphoma studies →Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 540 studies on the registry; 120 are open to participants now.
Of its 71 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 56 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with B-ALL diagnosed during or after December 2022
Exclusion Criteria:
Percentage of participants with complete remission
Complete remission as defined by patients having no lymphoblasts in the marrow or blood
Time frame: 5 years or e.g., 1 year after closure of study
Overall Survival
Percentage of participants overall survival (OS). OS will be calculated from the time of diagnosis of to death from any cause, and patients will be censored if they were alive at the last follow-up
Time frame: 5 years
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medical College of Wisconsin