ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03739814Updated Oct 28, 2026

Inotuzumab Ozogamicin and Blinatumomab With or Without Ponatinib in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed, Recurrent, or Refractory CD22-Positive B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A Phase 2 interventional study of Biospecimen Collection and Blinatumomab in B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Philadelphia Chromosome Negative, Recurrent B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Refractory B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Recruiting at 285 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2019; still recruiting 7 years 6 months later.
Updated Oct 28, 2026Site recruiting status changed6 sites added+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase II trial studies how well inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab with or without ponatinib work in treating patients with CD22-positive B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia that is newly diagnosed, has come back after a period of improvement (recurrent), or does not respond to treatment (refractory). Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a monoclonal antibody, called inotuzumab, linked to a chemotherapy drug, called ozogamicin. Inotuzumab is a form of targeted therapy because it attaches to specific molecules (receptors) on the surface of cancer cells, known as CD22 receptors, and delivers ozogamicin to kill them. Blinatumomab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. A monoclonal antibody is a type of protein that can bind to certain targets in the body, such as molecules that cause the body to make an immune response (antigens). Ponatinib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab with or without ponatinib may be effective in treating patients with newly diagnosed, recurrent or refractory CD22 positive B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

Ia. For Philadelphia (Ph)-negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), to confirm tolerability of the combination regimen of inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by blinatumomab.

Ib. For Ph-positive B-cell ALL, to confirm tolerability of ponatinib in combination with inotuzumab ozogamicin and blinatumomab.

II. To estimate the 1-year event-free survival of older, transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed, Ph-negative, CD22-positive, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin induction followed by blinatumomab consolidation. (Cohort 1) III. To estimate the 1-year event-free survival of patients with relapsed or refractory Ph-negative, CD22-positive, B-cell ALL treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin induction followed by blinatumomab consolidation. (Cohort 2) IV. To determine the feasibility of the regimen in adult patients with CD22-positive, Ph/BCR-ABL1-positive B-cell ALL. (Cohort 3)

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year overall survival (OS) in all eligible patients. (Cohort 1) II. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in all eligible patients. (Cohort 1) III. To estimate the median and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) in all eligible patients. (Cohort 1) IV. To estimate the complete response (CR) rate and overall response rate (ORR, defined as complete response [CR] + complete response with incomplete count recovery [CRi]) to inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by blinatumomab (regimen CR rate and ORR). (Cohort 1) V. To estimate the CR rate and ORR (CR + CRi) to inotuzumab ozogamicin induction alone (induction CR and ORR). (Cohort 1) VI. To estimate the minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate in subjects achieving a CR or CRi. (Cohort 1) VII. To estimate the treatment-related mortality with this regimen. (Cohort 1) VIII. To describe the safety and tolerability of this regimen. (Cohort 1) IX. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year OS in all eligible patients. (Cohort 2) X. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS in all eligible patients. (Cohort 2) XI. To estimate the median and 3-year EFS in all eligible patients. (Cohort 2) XII. To estimate ORR (CR/CRi and CR/complete response with partial hematologic recovery [CRh]) to blinatumomab in patients with ALL refractory to inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 2) XIII. To estimate the CR, CRi, and CRh rates at defined time points and cumulatively for the entire regimen. (Cohort 2) XIV. To determine the MRD negativity (\< 10\^-4) rate at defined time points including prior to allogeneic HCT and cumulatively in patients achieving a CR, CRh, or CRi. (Cohort 2) XV. To determine the allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) rate in eligible subjects. (Cohort 2) XVI. To estimate the treatment-related mortality with this regimen. (Cohort 2) XVII. To describe the safety and tolerability of this regimen. (Cohort 2) XVIII. To estimate the 24-week complete molecular response rate. (Cohort 3) XIX. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year OS in all eligible patients. (Cohort 3) XX. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS in all eligible patients. (Cohort 3) XXI. To estimate the median and 3-year EFS in all eligible patients. (Cohort 3) XXII. To estimate ORR (CR/CRi and CR/complete response with partial hematologic recovery [CRh]) to blinatumomab in patients with ALL refractory to inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 3) XXIII. To estimate the CR, CRi, and CRh rates at defined time points and cumulatively for the entire regimen. (Cohort 3) XXIV. To determine the complete molecular response rate at defined time points and cumulatively in patients achieving a CR, CRh, or CRi. (Cohort 3) XXV. To estimate the treatment-related mortality with this regimen. (Cohort 3) XXVI. To describe the safety and tolerability of this regimen. (Cohort 3)

OTHER OBJECTIVE:

I. Results of the primary analysis will be examined for consistency, while accounting for the stratification factors and/or covariates of baseline quality of life (QOL) and fatigue.

CORRELATIVE SCIENCE OBJECTIVES:

I. To correlate specific karyotype groups (normal or various primary and secondary chromosomal abnormalities) with clinical and laboratory parameters.

II. To correlate specific karyotype groups with response rates, response duration, survival, and cure in patients treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by blinatumomab.

III. To correlate specific karyotype groups with MRD. IV. To determine karyotype changes at relapse and the influence of the type of change (or no change) in karyotype at relapse.

V. To assess the correlation of quantitative MRD post-induction with inotuzumab ozogamicin and at sequential consolidation time points with blinatumomab with RFS, EFS, and OS.

VI. To correlate the influence of MRD status (detectable versus [vs.] not and as a continuous measure) in relation to EFS, RFS, and OS with other clinical and biological factors (e.g. previously untreated vs. relapsed disease cohorts; age, initial white blood cell [WBC] count, cytogenetics).

VII. To identify genetic variants and predictors of ex vivo resistance. VIII. To identify genetic variants and predictors of MRD. IX. To identify genetic variants and predictors of relapse. X. To determine inter-patient variability in drug sensitivity of adult ALL. XI. To examine the associations of drug sensitivity with host and leukemia molecular features.

XII. To evaluate T-cell populations and T-cell function during therapy using T-cell markers which include the T-cell subset defining markers CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO, CCR7, CD25, CD127, FOXP3, CD 27, CD28, among others, and markers of T cell exhaustion and senescence including CD57, PD-1, Tim-3, LAG-3, TIGIT, CTLA4, CD160, and ICOS among others.

XIII. To evaluate cytokine levels, and compare between patients who attain a CR vs. those with stable or progressive disease.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, EFS, and OS in patients achieving a CR/CRi to inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 1) II. To compare the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, EFS, and OS among patients achieving MRD-negative vs. MRD-positive CR/CRi to inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 1) III. To compare the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, EFS, and OS among patients achieving MRD-negative vs. MRD-positive CR/CRi at any time. (Cohort 1) IV. To describe the rate, severity, and timing of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) of the liver after limited inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure and identify risk factors for SOS/VOD. (Cohort 1) V. To estimate the rate of cytokine release syndrome in this population. (Cohort 1) VI. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS from time of CR/CRi to inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients receiving inotuzumab ozogamicin followed by blinatumomab and not undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). (Cohort 2) VII. To estimate median, 1-year, and 3-year OS after CR/CRi to inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients not undergoing allogeneic HCT. (Cohort 2) VIII. To compare in a non-randomized fashion median, 1-year, and 3-year OS, median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and non-relapse mortality (NRM) between patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation with or without allogeneic HCT. (Cohort 2) IX. To describe the rate, severity, and timing of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) of the liver after limited inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure and identify risk factors for SOS/VOD. (Cohort 2) X. To estimate the rate of cytokine release syndrome in this population. (Cohort 2) XI. To estimate the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, EFS, and OS in patients achieving a CR/CRi to inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 3) XII. To compare the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, EFS, and OS among patients with CR/CRi achieving complete molecular response vs. not to inotuzumab ozogamicin. (Cohort 3) XIII. To compare the median, 1-year, and 3-year RFS, EFS, and OS among patients achieving CR/CRi achieving complete molecular response vs. not at any time. (Cohort 3) XIV. To describe the rate, severity, and timing of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) of the liver after limited inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure and identify risk factors for SOS/VOD. (Cohort 3) XV. To estimate the rate of cytokine release syndrome in this population. (Cohort 3) XVI. To assess ABL1 mutational patterns at relapse. (Cohort 3)

OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts.

COHORT 1: Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on day 1, 8, and 15 (Course IA). By the end of Course IA (day 21), patients with adequate ALL cytoreduction continue to Course IB/IC, and patients who fail to achieve ALL cytoreduction continue to Course II. By the end of Course II, patients with CR-CRi to Course IB/IC and Course II continue to Course IIIA, patients without adequate ALL cytoreduction to Course IA or refractory to Course IB/IC but CR/CRi to Course II continue to Course IIIB. Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients undergo lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid sample collection at baseline and may undergo additionally throughout the study.

COHORT 2: Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 1 hour on day 1, 8, and 15 (Course IA). By the end of Course IA (day 21), patients with adequate ALL cytoreduction continue to Course IB/IC, and patients who fail to achieve ALL cytoreduction continue to Course II. Patients with CR/CRi at the end of Course II continue to Course IIIB.

COURSE IB/IC: Patients receive inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment continues for 1 course (28 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

COURSE II: Patients receive blinatumomab IV continuously on days 1-28 and 43-70. Treatment continues for 1 course (84 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

COURSE IIIA: Patients receive blinatumomab IV continuously on days 1-28 and 43-70. Treatment continues for 1 course (84 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

COURSE IIIB: Patients receive blinatumomab IV continuously on days 1-28, 43-70, and 85-112. Treatment continues for 1 course (126 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients undergo lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid sample collection at baseline and may undergo additionally throughout the study.

COHORT 3:

INDUCTION:

COURSE I: Patients receive ponatinib orally (PO) daily (QD) on day 1-35, dexamethasone PO QD on days 1-7 and 15-21 and methotrexate intrathecally (IT) on day 1, 15 and 29 for 1 course (35 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with CR or CRi continue to consolidation course IIA or end the study treatment to receive allogenic HCT per the treating physician. Patients without CR or CRi with but adequate ALL cytoreduction (defined as ≥ 50% reduction in bone marrow lymphoblasts from the pre-registration bone marrow aspirate/biopsy and/or ≤ 20% marrow cellularity at the end of Course I bone marrow aspirate/biopsy) also proceed to consolidation course IIA. Patients with progression or failure to achieve adequate ALL cytoreduction are removed from study treatment.

CONSOLIDATION:

COURSE IIA: Patients receive ponatinib PO QD on days 1-21, inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 1 hour on days 1, 8 and 15 and methotrexate IT on day 1 for 1 course (21 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with CR or CRi continue to consolidation course IIB or end the study treatment to receive allogenic HCT per the treating physician. Patients without CR or CRi and without progressive disease proceed to course IIC. Patients with progression are removed from study treatment.

COURSE IIB/C: Patients receive ponatinib PO QD on days 1-28, inotuzumab ozogamicin IV over 1 hour on days 1, 8 and 15 and methotrexate IT on day 1 for 1 course (28 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with CR or CRi end the study treatment to receive allogenic HCT per the treating physician. Patients with progression are removed from study treatment. All other patients proceed to course III.

COURSE III: Patients receive ponatinib PO QD on days 1-84 and receive blinatumomab IV continuously on days 1-28 and 43-70. Treatment continues for 1 course (84 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients in CR/CRi proceed to course IV. Patients not in CR/CRi are removed from study treatment.

COURSE IV: Patients receive ponatinib PO QD on days 1-84 and receive blinatumomab IV continuously on days 1-28 and 43-70. Treatment continues for 1 course (84 days) in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients in CR/CRi proceed to maintenance. Patients not in CR/CRi are removed from study treatment.

MAINTENANCE: Patients receive ponatinib PO QD for 24 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Patients undergo bone marrow aspiration and biopsy and blood sample collection throughout the study. Patients undergo lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid sample collection at baseline and may undergo additionally throughout the study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 3 years, and then every 6 months for up to 10 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Philadelphia Chromosome Negative
  • Recurrent B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • Refractory B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Burkitt Lymphoma

976 studies on the registry are indexed under Burkitt Lymphoma; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 36 across 765 interventional studies indexed under Burkitt Lymphoma.

Browse Burkitt Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,556 studies on the registry; 336 are open to participants now.

Of its 411 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 373 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • STEP 0: Submission of bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood for MRD analysis is mandatory prior to registration; the bone marrow sample should be from the first aspiration (i.e. first pull). Aspirate needle should be redirected if needed to get first pull bone marrow aspirate. It should be initiated as soon as possible after pre-registration. The specimens should be sent to the HEME Biobank.

    • Lumbar Puncture (Spinal Tap) and Intrathecal Methotrexate:

      • Patients may receive the day 1 of course IA dose of intrathecal (IT) methotrexate during the prior-to-registration lumbar puncture (or the venous line placement) to avoid a second lumbar puncture. If the dose is administered prior to registration, then systemic chemotherapy must begin within 7 days of this IT chemotherapy.
  • STEP 1: Morphologic diagnosis of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Patients with Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia are not eligible.
  • STEP 1: CD22-positive disease defined as CD22 expression by >= 20% of lymphoblasts by local hematopathology evaluation.
  • STEP 1: Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1-negative or Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1-positive B-cell ALL by cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
  • STEP 1: No active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia (i.e. only CNS-1 disease allowed). Active CNS leukemia is defined as morphologic evidence of lymphoblasts in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), use of CNS-directed local treatment for active disease within 28 days prior to registration, symptomatic CNS leukemia (i.e. cranial nerve palsies or other significant neurological dysfunction) within the 28 days prior to registration, and/or known asymptomatic parenchymal CNS mass lesions; see below for additional guidance. Prophylactic intrathecal medication alone is not an exclusion.

    • Categories of CNS Involvement for CNS Evaluation Prior to Registration:

      • CNS 1: CSF has \< 5 WBC/uL with cytospin negative for blasts; or >= 10 red blood cell (RBC)/uL with cytospin negative for blasts.
      • CNS 2: CSF has \< 5 WBC/uL with cytospin positive for blasts; or >= 10 RBC/uL with cytospin positive for blasts; or >= 10 RBC/uL, WBC/uL >= 5 but less than Steinherz/Bleyer algorithm with cytospin positive for blasts (see below).
      • CNS 3: CSF has >= 5 WBC/uL with cytospin positive for blasts; or >= 10 RBC/uL, >= 5 WBC/uL and positive by Steinherz/Bleyer algorithm (see below); or clinical signs of CNS leukemia (such as facial nerve palsy, brain/eye involvement or hypothalamic syndrome). Steinherz/Bleyer Method of Evaluating Initial Traumatic Lumbar Punctures:

        • If the patient has leukemia cells in the peripheral blood and the lumbar puncture is traumatic and contains >= 5 WBC/uL with blasts, the following algorithm should be used to define CNS disease: CSF WBC/CSF RBC > 2 x (Blood WBC/Blood RBC count)
  • STEP 1: Patients with known or suspected testicular involvement by leukemia are allowed provided that the patient receives concomitant scrotal/testicular radiotherapy.

    • Unilateral or bilateral testicular enlargement should be assessed by ultrasound or other imaging technique. is recommended if clinical findings are equivocal or suggestive of hydrocele or a non-leukemic mass, but further assessments are per treating physician discretion.
  • STEP 1: Not pregnant and not nursing.

    • This study involves agents that have known genotoxic, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects. Therefore, for women of only, a negative pregnancy test done =\< 7 days prior to registration is required.
  • STEP 1: (ECOG) performance status: 0-2
  • STEP 1: No unstable cardiac disease such as myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, uncontrolled heart failure, or uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia within 6 months of registration.
  • STEP 1: No impaired cardiac function, defined as (LVEF) \< 45% or (NYHA) stage III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF).
  • STEP 1: Patients with known (HIV) infection are eligible if they have been on effective antiretroviral therapy with an undetectable viral load tested within 6 months of registration.
  • STEP 1: Patients with virus (HBV) are eligible only if they meet all the following:

    • On HBV-suppressive therapy.
    • No evidence of active virus.
    • No evidence of HBV-related liver damage.
  • STEP 1: Patients with virus (HCV) are eligible only if they meet all the following:

    • Successfully completed complete-eradication therapy with undetectable viral load.
    • No evidence of HCV-related liver damage.
  • STEP 1: No history of neurologic disorder such as epilepsy, seizure, aphasia, stroke, severe brain injury, structural brain abnormality, benign brain tumor, dementia, Parkinson's disease, movement disorder, cerebellar disease, or other significant CNS abnormalities.
  • STEP 1: No prior additional (i.e. in addition to ALL) except adequately treated basal- or squamous-cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, stage I or II cancer from which the patient is currently in complete remission, or any other cancer from which the patient has been disease-free for >= 2 years.
  • STEP 1: No history of clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia, unexplained non-vasovagal syncope, or chronic bradycardic states such as sinoatrial block or higher degree of atrioventricular block unless a permanent pacemaker has been implanted.
  • STEP 1: No history of chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis.
  • STEP 1: No history of sinusoidal occlusion syndrome/veno-occlusive disease of the liver.
  • STEP 1: No uncontrolled infection or recent history (within 4 months prior to registration) of deep tissue infections such as fasciitis or osteomyelitis.
  • STEP 1: Total , serum =\< 1.5 x (ULN)*

    • Except in the event of: 1) Gilbert disease, in which case total bilirubin must be =\< 2 x ULN, or 2) elevated bilirubin believed by investigator to be due to leukemic infiltration, in which case total bilirubin must be =\< 2 x ULN.
  • STEP 1: (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) =\< 2.5 x ULN
  • STEP 1: Creatinine, serum =\< 1.5 ULN OR >= 40 mL/min
  • STEP 1: by Fridericia's correction formula (QTcF) =\< 470 msec
  • COHORT 1: Age >= 60 years.
  • COHORT 1: Diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1-negative B-cell ALL.
  • COHORT 1: No prior treatment for ALL except a single dose of intrathecal chemotherapy, , hydroxyurea, and/or leukapheresis to reduce peripheral blast count and prevent ALL complications. Allowed therapy may be administered for no more than 14 days and must be completed >= 24 hours prior to the initiation of protocol therapy.
  • COHORT 1: No plan for or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).
  • COHORT 2: Age >= 18 years.
  • COHORT 2: Diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1-negative B-cell ALL.
  • COHORT 2: disease in salvage 1 or 2.
  • COHORT 2: No isolated extramedullary relapse.
  • COHORT 2: Prior allogeneic HCT permitted.
  • COHORT 2: Patients with prior allogeneic HCT must have completed transplantation >= 4 months prior to registration.
  • COHORT 2: Patients with prior allogeneic HCT must have no evidence of and must have completed therapy >= 30 days prior to registration.
  • COHORT 2: Prior treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, other CD22-directed therapy, or other CD19-directed therapy is not allowed.
  • COHORT 2: Prior treatment with rituximab must be completed >= 7 days prior to registration.
  • COHORT 2: Prior treatment with other monoclonal antibodies must be completed >= 6 weeks prior to registration.
  • COHORT 2: Prior treatment for ALL must be completed >= 14 days prior to registration with the following exceptions: intrathecal chemotherapy, hydroxyurea, corticosteroids, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, vincristine, and/or leukapheresis to reduce circulating absolute lymphoblast count to =\< 10,000/uL or prevent complications related to ALL are allowed but must be completed >= 24 hours prior to the initiation of protocol therapy.
  • COHORT 2: Patients should have resolution of any acute non-hematologic toxicities of prior therapy to National Cancer Institute (NCI) (CTCAE) version (v)5.0 grade =\< 1.
  • COHORT 2: Peripheral blood absolute lymphoblast count =\< 10,000/uL (treatment allowed as above to reduce blast count to =\< 10,000/uL)
  • COHORT 3: Age ≥ 75 years OR age ≥ 18 years AND ineligible for hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (HyperCVAD) regimens
  • COHORT 3: Diagnosis of Philadelphia chromosome/BCR-ABL1-positive B-cell ALL
  • COHORT 3: No prior treatment for ALL except a single dose of intrathecal chemotherapy, corticosteroids, hydroxyurea, BCR-ABL1-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and/or leukapheresis to reduce peripheral blast count and prevent ALL complications. Allowed non-protocol therapy may be administered for no more than 14 days and must be completed ≥ 24 hours prior to the initiation of protocol therapy.
  • COHORT 3: No chronic, strong inducers
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(22)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

GVHD (graft-versus-host disease)

After a transplant from a donor, the donor’s immune cells attack the recipient’s body, often the skin, gut or liver.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1 (inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab)

    See Detailed Description..

    Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Biological: Blinatumomab · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Biological: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin · Procedure: Lumbar Puncture

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2 (inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab)

    See Detailed Description.

    Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Biological: Blinatumomab · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Biological: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin · Procedure: Lumbar Puncture

  • Experimental
    Cohort 3 (inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab, ponatinib))

    See detailed description

    Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Biological: Blinatumomab · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Biological: Inotuzumab Ozogamicin · Procedure: Lumbar Puncture · Drug: Ponatinib

Interventions

  • ProcedureBiospecimen Collection

    Undergo blood sample and cerebrospinal fluid collection

    Also known as: Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Sample Collection, Specimen Collection

  • BiologicalBlinatumomab

    Given IV

    Also known as: AMG 103, AMG-103, AMG103, Anti-CD19 x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, Anti-CD19/Anti-CD3 Recombinant Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody MT103, Blincyto, MEDI 538, MEDI-538, MEDI538, MT 103, MT-103, MT103

  • ProcedureBone Marrow Aspiration

    Undergo bone marrow aspiration

  • ProcedureBone Marrow Biopsy

    Undergo bone marrow biopsy

    Also known as: Biopsy of Bone Marrow, Biopsy, Bone Marrow

  • Given IV

    Also known as: Besponsa, CMC 544, CMC-544, CMC544, Way 207294, WAY-207294

  • ProcedureLumbar Puncture

    Undergo lumbar puncture

    Also known as: LP, Spinal Tap

  • Given PO

    Also known as: AP 24534, AP-24534, AP24534

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Event-free survival

    Will be defined as time from start of treatment to failure to achieve complete response (CR)/complete response with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after completing Course II of blinatumomab, relapse after CR/CRi, progression on study requiring withdrawal from study therapy, or death from any cause

    Time frame: At 1 year

  2. Completion of protocol treatment (cohort 3)

    Feasibility defined as completion of the planned therapy as defined in the protocol. Success rate defined as the proportion of patients who either complete entire protocol treatment or go off protocol treatment due to the disease (e.g., refractory disease, progression, and relapse).

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Will be evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A 95% confidence interval for the 1- and 3-year rates will be constructed using a point-wise confidence interval for the survival function based on a log-minus-log transformation. Will also calculate a 95% confidence interval by using a point-wise confidence interval for the survival function based on a log-minus-log transformation.

    Time frame: Time from start of study therapy to death from any cause censored at the last known alive date, assessed up to 10 years

  2. Relapse-free survival (RFS)

    Will be evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A 95% confidence interval for the 1- and 3-year rates will be constructed using a point-wise confidence interval for the survival function based on a log-minus-log transformation. Will also calculate a 95% confidence interval by using a point-wise confidence interval for the survival function based on a log-minus-log transformation.

    Time frame: Time from first CR/CRi to progressive disease (relapse, treatment discontinuation due to health deterioration) or death, assessed up to 10 years

  3. Event-free survival (EFS)

    Will be evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A 95% confidence interval for the 1- and 3-year rates will be constructed using a point-wise confidence interval for the survival function based on a log-minus-log transformation. Will also calculate a 95% confidence interval by using a point-wise confidence interval for the survival function based on a log-minus-log transformation.

    Time frame: Time from start of treatment to failure to achieve CR/CRi after completing Course II of blinatumomab, relapse after CR/CRi, progression on study requiring withdrawal from study therapy, or death from any cause, assessed up to 10 years

  4. Complete and overall response rate

    Point and interval estimates of the rates will be shown using a 95% binomial confidence interval.

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

  5. Minimal residual disease negativity

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

  6. Complete molecular response

    Defined as negative BCR-ABL1 quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction on bone marrow aspirate in patients in CR/complete response with partial hematologic recovery/CRi.

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

  7. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation rate (Cohort 2)

    Point and interval estimates of the rate will be shown using a 95% binomial confidence interval.

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

Other outcomes

  1. Rate of cytokine release syndrome (Cohort 1)

    Point and interval estimates of the rate will be shown using a 95% binomial confidence interval.

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

  2. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) of the liver

    The rate of, timing of, and risk factors for SOS/VOD of the liver after limited inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure. Point and interval estimates of the rate will be shown using a 95% binomial confidence interval. A summary of the timing and risk factors for SOS/VOD of the liver will be provided.

    Time frame: Up to 10 years

  3. OS

    Will compare between patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation versus (vs.) patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The median, 1-year, and 2-year OS will be compared between the above two groups. The distribution of OS for each group will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  4. RFS

    Will compare between patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation vs. patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The median, 1-year, and 2-year RFS will be compared between the above two groups. The distribution of RFS for each treatment arm will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  5. Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR)

    Will compare between patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation vs. patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Competing risk analysis will be done to compare the relapse rates between the above two groups. In this analysis, death will be considered a competing event. Relapse rates at the 1-year and 2-year time points will be estimated. Other time points of interest may be estimated as well.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

  6. Non-relapse mortality

    Will compare between patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation vs. patients achieving CR/CRi and receiving consolidation without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Competing risk analysis will be done to compare the mortality rates between the above two groups. In this analysis, relapse will be considered a competing event. Mortality rates at the 1-year and 2-year time points will be estimated. Other time points may be estimated as well.

    Time frame: Up to 2 years

07

Study locations

89 of 285 sites recruiting

Showing the first 100 of 285 sites across 2 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Davis KL, Yao CC, Zimmerman JAO, Rau RE. Immunotherapy in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2025 Dec;23(12):e257067. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2025.7067. PubMed 41671463 ↗
  • Wieduwilt MJ, Yin J, Kour O, Teske R, Stock W, Escherich C, Yang J, Li Z, Byrd K, Doucette K, Mangan J, Hall S, Mims AS, Jamieson K, Dinner SN, Bseiso AW, Giordano G, Saygin C, Uy GL, Litzow MR, Stone RM. Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Then Blinatumomab for Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed B-Cell ALL: Alliance Study A041703 Cohort 1 Results. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Nov 10;43(32):3526-3535. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-00307. Epub 2025 Sep 30. PubMed 41026957 ↗
  • Shi Z, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Chen B. Monoclonal antibodies: new chance in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):642-652. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2074704. PubMed 35622074 ↗
09

Updates

7 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Sites
6 sites added, 1 site removed. 7 sites changed recruiting status (3 now recruiting, 2 now suspended, …)
Show 7 sites
  • OptumCare Cancer Care at Charleston · Las Vegas, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
  • OptumCare Cancer Care at Fort Apache · Las Vegas, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
  • Clackamas Radiation Oncology Center · Clackamas, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
  • Providence Newberg Medical Center · Newberg, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
  • Providence Willamette Falls Medical Center · Oregon City, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
  • West Virginia University Healthcare · Morgantown, United StatesRecruiting→Active, not recruiting
  • Mercy Medical Center · Springfield, United StatesSuspended→Active, not recruiting
Show 6 added (6 United States)
  • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - West Des Moines Clinic · Clive, United States
  • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Ankeny Clinic · Ankeny, United States
  • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Des Moines Clinic · Des Moines, United States
  • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Laurel Clinic · Des Moines, United States
  • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Waukee Clinic · Waukee, United States
  • Trinity Health IHA Medical Group-Alice Gustafson Center · Pontiac, United States
Show 1 removed
  • Newland Medical Associates-Pontiac · Pontiac, United States
across 6 updates, Oct 6, 2026 – Oct 28, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 11 sites. See the sites
Show 11 sites
  • Providence Portland Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • OptumCare Cancer Care at Charleston · Las Vegas, United StatesContact removed r•••@sncrf.org · •••0013Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
  • OptumCare Cancer Care at Fort Apache · Las Vegas, United StatesContact removed r•••@sncrf.org · •••0013Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
  • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center · Chicago, United StatesContact added c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross · New Lenox, United StatesContact added c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • University of Chicago Medicine-Orland Park · Orland Park, United StatesContact added c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • Clackamas Radiation Oncology Center · Clackamas, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • Providence Newberg Medical Center · Newberg, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • Providence Willamette Falls Medical Center · Oregon City, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  • West Virginia University Healthcare · Morgantown, United StatesContact removed c•••@hsc.wvu.edu · •••7374Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
across 4 updates, Sep 29, 2026 – Oct 16, 2026
Show all 7 updates
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    Mercy Medical Center is now Active, not recruiting
  2. Oct 26, 2026
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • Trinity Health IHA Medical Group-Alice Gustafson Center · Pontiac, United States
    Show 1 removed
    • Newland Medical Associates-Pontiac · Pontiac, United States
  3. Oct 19, 2026
    4 sites added
    Show 4 added (4 United States)
    • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Ankeny Clinic · Ankeny, United States
    • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Des Moines Clinic · Des Moines, United States
    • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Laurel Clinic · Des Moines, United States
    • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - Waukee Clinic · Waukee, United States
  4. Oct 16, 2026
    4 sites changed recruiting status (3 now recruiting, 1 now active, not recruiting)
    Show 4 sites
    • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center · Chicago, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross · New Lenox, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • University of Chicago Medicine-Orland Park · Orland Park, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • West Virginia University Healthcare · Morgantown, United StatesRecruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Site contacts Changed at 4 sites. See the sites
    Show 4 sites
    • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center · Chicago, United StatesContact added c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross · New Lenox, United StatesContact added c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • University of Chicago Medicine-Orland Park · Orland Park, United StatesContact added c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • West Virginia University Healthcare · Morgantown, United StatesContact removed c•••@hsc.wvu.edu · •••7374Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
  5. Oct 14, 2026
    8 sites changed recruiting status (5 now recruiting, 3 now suspended)
    Show 8 sites
    • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center · Chicago, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    • UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross · New Lenox, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    • University of Chicago Medicine-Orland Park · Orland Park, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    • Clackamas Radiation Oncology Center · Clackamas, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • Providence Newberg Medical Center · Newberg, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • Providence Willamette Falls Medical Center · Oregon City, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • Providence Portland Medical Center · Portland, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    • Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center · Portland, United StatesSuspended→Recruiting
    Site contacts Changed at 8 sites. See the sites
    Show 8 sites
    • University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center · Chicago, United StatesContact removed c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
    • UC Comprehensive Cancer Center at Silver Cross · New Lenox, United StatesContact removed c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
    • University of Chicago Medicine-Orland Park · Orland Park, United StatesContact removed c•••@bsd.uchicago.edu · •••8222Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
    • Clackamas Radiation Oncology Center · Clackamas, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Newberg Medical Center · Newberg, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Willamette Falls Medical Center · Oregon City, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Portland Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact added C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact added (no phone or email listed)
  6. Oct 6, 2026
    1 site added. 4 sites changed recruiting status (4 now suspended)
    Show 4 sites
    • OptumCare Cancer Care at Charleston · Las Vegas, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    • OptumCare Cancer Care at Fort Apache · Las Vegas, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    • Providence Portland Medical Center · Portland, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    • Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center · Portland, United StatesRecruiting→Suspended
    Show site
    • UI Health Care Mission Cancer and Blood - West Des Moines Clinic · Clive, United States
    Site contacts Changed at 4 sites. See the sites
    Show 4 sites
    • OptumCare Cancer Care at Charleston · Las Vegas, United StatesContact removed r•••@sncrf.org · •••0013Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
    • OptumCare Cancer Care at Fort Apache · Las Vegas, United StatesContact removed r•••@sncrf.org · •••0013Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Portland Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact removed C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact removed C•••@providence.org · •••2614Contact removed (no phone or email listed)
  7. Sep 29, 2026
    Site contacts Changed at 2 sites. See the sites
    Show 2 sites
    • Providence Portland Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact person changed (no phone or email listed)
    • Providence Saint Vincent Medical Center · Portland, United StatesContact person changed (no phone or email listed)

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03739814
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 14, 2018
Start date
May 8, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Matthew J Wieduwilt
principal investigator · Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Blinatumomab · Inotuzumab Ozogamicin

Start the discussion