ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07114809tDCScogUpdated Aug 11, 2025

Impact of Anodal tDCS and Virtual Reality on Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

An interventional study of Experimental group (EG) performing Anodal-tDCS (A-tDCS) and VR and Sham Comparator: Control group (CG) performing sham-tDCS (S-tCDS) and VR in Cognitive Impairment and Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Ospedale Policlinico San Martino. Recruiting at 3 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-11.

Sponsored by Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2024, registered Aug 2025).
  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cognitive impairment (CI) affects a large amount of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) even in the early stages of the disease, increasing the perception of fatigue and compromising the quality of life. Different restorative interventions have been tried in order to alleviate CI, but with limited efficacy .

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), represents a very promising alternative, or add-on, to the traditional rehabilitative approaches in MS. Notably, other novel technologies, such as Virtual Reality (VR) and Exergame, are emerging as a reinforcing tool to the rehabilitative treatment of PwMS. tDCS and VR can be combined in protocols aimed at achieving a better therapeutic benefit across different neurological diseases (Cassani 2020). The aim of our project is to explore the potential benefits of the simultaneous application of AtDCS and VR in the rehabilitation of cognitive impairment of PwMS. The VR approach will be implemented with a non-immersive VR system (exergames). As a secondary outcome, we wish to verify whether our protocol may extend its benefits over 6 months. Eighty PwMs with CI will be consecutively enrolled. Their cognitive status will be assessed by a neuropsychological battery: the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. To be considered cognitively impaired one has to abnormally score on at least two tests. Forty patients will be randomized to the experimental group (EG) or to the control group (CG). All the patients will undergo rehabilitative treatment with exergame (10 sessions for two consecutive weeks, 5 days per week). The EG patients will undergo a concurrent A-tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, while the CG will receive a sham stimulation (S-tDCS). The patients will be evaluated at baseline, at the end of the treatment, one month and six months later. The statistical analyses will be done using repeated-measures ANOVA. Expected results: we hypothesize that the cognitive performances of both EG and CG groups will show an improvement in the cognitive performances. We will expect, however, a significative difference between the two groups, with patients in the EG group demonstrating better results than the CG group. Finally, we hypothesize the beneficial effects in EG patients will last at least one month after the end of the experiment.

Read the detailed description

To achieve our aims, we planned a double-blind, randomized, prospective, controlled study. To this purpose, we will recruit 80 MS subjects affected by cognitive impairment (CI). Patients will be selected from outpatients attending the Department of Neurology of ASL3 Genoa and the Neurorehabilitation unit of IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa. The participants will be randomly assigned to two groups, 40 in the experimental group (EG), 40 in the control group (CG), matched for demographic data (gender, age), EDSS and disease duration. All subjects will undergo a cognitive training by means of the exergames system (10 sessions, one hour per session, 5 days per week, for two consecutive weeks). Patients in the EG group will undergo a simultaneous A-tDCS over the left DLFPC, while CG will receive a S-tDCS over the same area. The tDCS will be delivered by a battery-driven, constant current simulator with a LCD touch screen (HDC progr), a portable stimulator (HDC stim), two holding bags of plant cellulose (7x5 cm) and two electrodes of conductive silicone. The active (anodal) electrode will be placed by means of a cap on the scalp overlying the left DLPFC (46 Brodmann Area). The reference electrode will be located over the right shoulder. The choice of the left DLPFC as the site of stimulation relies upon the evidence that this region has a critical role in the "top-down" control of the task-relevant stimuli processing .

In addition, in tasks where a cognitive conflict arises, the DLPFC contributes to increased cognitive control through its connections with the anterior cingulate cortex . Finally A-tDCS of the DLPFC has been shown to enhance working memory and executive function in healthy subjects as well as in PwMS . An electroconductive gel will be applied under the electrodes in order to reduce contact impedance. Impedance will be constantly kept below 5 kOhm. Only the tDCS investigators will be aware of the type of stimulation, while the patients and the neuropsychological assessors will be blind as to the nature of the project. During the exergames training (on-line procedure), A-tDCS (current of 1,5 mA) will be delivered for 20 minutes, while maintaining the current density (0.06 mA/ cm2) below the safety limits . In the StDCS session (20 minutes) the current will be turned off 30 sec after the beginning of the stimulation and turned on for the last 30 sec. By doing this, the patient feels an itching sensation below the electrodes at the beginning and at the end of stimulation, making this condition indistinguishable from the real (anodic) stimulation. Doing this, all the subjects will be blinded on the type of stimulation (anodal or sham). All the patients will participate to the cognitive training by means of exergames, which includes motor and cognitive tasks that incorporate enjoyment, technology, and health care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Cognitive impairment
  • Multiple Sclerosis
  • Exergaiming
  • Virtual Reality
  • tDCS
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Ospedale Policlinico San Martino is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. MS diagnosis according to McDonald's criteria (McDonald 2017);
  2. age between 18 and 60 (to avoid participants with possible CI due to aging); 3) disability score ≤7.5 at the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS, Kurtzke 1983).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. subjects affected by major psychiatric disorders
  2. epilepsy
  3. previous brain surgery
  4. MS relapse requiring therapy in the previous two months
  5. bilateral visual acuity \< 6/10
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group (EG) performing Anodal-tDCS (A-tDCS) and VR

    EG subjects will undergo a rehabilitative treatment with exergame and concurrent A-tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

    Device: Experimental group (EG) performing Anodal-tDCS (A-tDCS) and VR

  • Sham comparator
    Control group (CG) performing sham-tDCS (S-tCDS) and VR

    CG subjects will undergo a rehabilitative treatment with exergame and concurrent S-tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

    Device: Sham Comparator: Control group (CG) performing sham-tDCS (S-tCDS) and VR

Interventions

  • DeviceExperimental group (EG) performing Anodal-tDCS (A-tDCS) and VR

    Patients in the EG group will undergo a simultaneous A-tDCS over the left DLFPC. The tDCS will be delivered by a battery-driven, constant current simulator, two holding bags of plant cellulose (7x5 cm) and two electrodes of conductive silicone. The active (anodal) electrode will be placed by means of a cap on the scalp overlying the left DLPFC (46 Brodmann Area). The reference electrode will be located over the right shoulder. The choice of the left DLPFC as the site of stimulation relies upon the evidence that this region has a critical role in the "top-down" control of the task-relevant stimuli processing (Miller 2001).The DLPFC contributes to increase cognitive control through its connections with the anterior cingulate cortex and has been shown to enhance working memory and executive function. During the cognitive training (on-line procedure), A-tDCS (current of 1,5 mA) will be delivered for 20 minutes, while maintaining the current density (0.06 mA/cm2) below the safety limits.

  • DeviceSham Comparator: Control group (CG) performing sham-tDCS (S-tCDS) and VR

    CG will receive a S-tDCS over the DLPFC. In the S-tDCS session, the current will be turned off 30 sec after the beginning of the stimulation and turned on for the last 30 sec. By doing this, the patient feels an itching sensation below the electrodes at the beginning and at the end of stimulation, making this condition indistinguishable from the real A-tDCS stimulation. Doing this, all the subjects will be blinded on the type of stimulation. As well as in the EG, CG performs cognitive training including motor and cognitive exergames that incorporate enjoyment, technology, and health care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Revised Brief Visuo-Spatial Memory test (BVMT-R)

    Part of the BICAMS test. minimum score 0 (poor performance) maximum score 12 (normal performance)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later

  2. Symbol digit modalities test (SDMT)

    Part of the BICAMS test. minimum score 0 (poor performance), maximum score 120 (normal performance)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later.

  3. California Verbal Learning test II edition (CVLT-II)

    Part of the BICAMS test. Minimum score 0 (poor performance), maximum score 80 (normal performance)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later

  4. Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task 3" and 2" intervals (PASAT)

    A neuropsychological test widely utilized for the cognitive assessment in PwMS. Minimum score 0 (poor performance) maximum score 60 (normal performance)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Multiple Sclerosis Quality of life (MSQoL)

    Self-reported measures of quality of life in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Minimum score 0 (poor performance), Maximum score 100 (normal performance)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later

  2. Beck depression inventory scale (BDI)

    Self-reported measures of mood (depression). Minimum score 0 (poor performance), maximum score 63 (normal performance)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later

  3. Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)

    Self-reported measures of fatigue in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Minimum score 9, maximum score 63. (Mean score ≥ 4: indicative of clinically significant fatigue. Mean score \< 4: fatigue not considered clinically significant.)

    Time frame: The patients will be evaluated at baseline, up to two weeks, one month and six months later

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Laver KE, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 12;2015(2):CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub3. PubMed 25927099 ↗
  • Cassani R, Novak GS, Falk TH, Oliveira AA. Virtual reality and non-invasive brain stimulation for rehabilitation applications: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Oct 31;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00780-5. PubMed 33129331 ↗
  • Solari A, Filippini G, Mendozzi L, Ghezzi A, Cifani S, Barbieri E, Baldini S, Salmaggi A, Mantia LL, Farinotti M, Caputo D, Mosconi P. Validation of Italian multiple sclerosis quality of life 54 questionnaire. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;67(2):158-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.2.158. PubMed 10406981 ↗
  • Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 24. PubMed 17452283 ↗
  • Charvet L, Shaw M, Dobbs B, Frontario A, Sherman K, Bikson M, Datta A, Krupp L, Zeinapour E, Kasschau M. Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increases the Benefit of At-Home Cognitive Training in Multiple Sclerosis. Neuromodulation. 2018 Jun;21(4):383-389. doi: 10.1111/ner.12583. Epub 2017 Feb 22. PubMed 28225155 ↗
  • Mattioli F, Bellomi F, Stampatori C, Capra R, Miniussi C. Neuroenhancement through cognitive training and anodal tDCS in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2016 Feb;22(2):222-30. doi: 10.1177/1352458515587597. Epub 2015 May 26. PubMed 26014600 ↗
  • Filippi M, Riccitelli G, Mattioli F, Capra R, Stampatori C, Pagani E, Valsasina P, Copetti M, Falini A, Comi G, Rocca MA. Multiple sclerosis: effects of cognitive rehabilitation on structural and functional MR imaging measures--an explorative study. Radiology. 2012 Mar;262(3):932-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11111299. PubMed 22357892 ↗
  • Mainero C, Caramia F, Pozzilli C, Pisani A, Pestalozza I, Borriello G, Bozzao L, Pantano P. fMRI evidence of brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):858-67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.004. PubMed 15006652 ↗
  • Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x. PubMed 10990547 ↗
  • Hiew S, Nguemeni C, Zeller D. Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in people with multiple sclerosis: a review. Eur J Neurol. 2022 Feb;29(2):648-664. doi: 10.1111/ene.15163. Epub 2021 Nov 19. PubMed 34725881 ↗
  • Grigorescu C, Chalah MA, Lefaucheur JP, Kumpfel T, Padberg F, Ayache SS, Palm U. Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Information Processing Speed, Working Memory, Attention, and Social Cognition in Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 15;11:545377. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.545377. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33178103 ↗
  • Nascimento AS, Fagundes CV, Mendes FADS, Leal JC. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 Sep;54:103128. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103128. Epub 2021 Jul 9. PubMed 34280679 ↗
  • Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, Reiss AL, Greicius MD. Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 28;27(9):2349-56. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007. PubMed 17329432 ↗
  • McNicholas N, O'Connell K, Yap SM, Killeen RP, Hutchinson M, McGuigan C. Cognitive dysfunction in early multiple sclerosis: a review. QJM. 2018 Jun 1;111(6):359-364. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx070. PubMed 28371862 ↗
  • Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, Marcolin MA, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Paulus W, Pascual-Leone A. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005 Sep;166(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6. Epub 2005 Jul 6. PubMed 15999258 ↗
  • De Giglio L, De Luca F, Prosperini L, Borriello G, Bianchi V, Pantano P, Pozzilli C. A low-cost cognitive rehabilitation with a commercial video game improves sustained attention and executive functions in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jun;29(5):453-61. doi: 10.1177/1545968314554623. Epub 2014 Nov 14. PubMed 25398725 ↗
  • Dardiotis E, Nousia A, Siokas V, Tsouris Z, Andravizou A, Mentis AA, Florou D, Messinis L, Nasios G. Efficacy of computer-based cognitive training in neuropsychological performance of patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Feb;20:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.12.017. Epub 2017 Dec 24. PubMed 29306740 ↗
  • Manuli A, Maggio MG, Tripoli D, Gulli M, Cannavo A, La Rosa G, Sciarrone F, Avena G, Calabro RS. Patients' perspective and usability of innovation technology in a new rehabilitation pathway: An exploratory study in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Sep;44:102312. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102312. Epub 2020 Jun 18. PubMed 32585618 ↗
  • Lang N, Siebner HR, Ward NS, Lee L, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN, Frackowiak RS. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jul;22(2):495-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04233.x. PubMed 16045502 ↗
  • Taylor MJ, Griffin M. The use of gaming technology for rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2015 Apr;21(4):355-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458514563593. Epub 2014 Dec 22. PubMed 25533296 ↗
  • Vestito L, Schenone C, Casazza F, Modenesi R, Iandolino A, Matichecchia MG, Saez LM, Botto M, Ponzano M, Gazzola P, Grange E, Brichetto G, Bandini F, Trompetto C, Mori L. Impact of anodal tDCS and virtual reality on cognitive dysfunction in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Protocol of a double blind, randomized, prospective, controlled study. PLoS One. 2025 Dec 4;20(12):e0337405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337405. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41343474 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At this time, individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns regarding patient confidentiality and the challenges of fully anonymizing sensitive clinical and neuropsychological data. In addition, data sharing is not currently covered by participant informed consent and would require additional ethical and regulatory approvals to ensure compliance with privacy laws and institutional policies.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2026, 16 months after the start.

Of 1,442 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cognitive Dysfunction, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,511 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 4, 2025
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
StartActual
Sep 2, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jan 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 2026
Last update
Aug 11, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07114809
Lead sponsor
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Collaborators
Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 11, 2025
Start date
Sep 2, 2024
Primary completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 11, 2025

Study contacts

Laura Mori, MD, PhD
Contact
laura.mori@hsanmartino.it
*39 010 555 5645
Lucilla Vestito, ST, PhD
Contact
lucilla.vestito@hsanmartino.it
+39 010 353 7038
Laura Mori, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Ospedale Policlinico San Martino IRCCS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion