ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07113535Updated Aug 8, 2025

Post-extubation Use RAM Cannula Versus Short Binasal Prong Interfaces in Preterm Infants

An interventional study of RAM cannula and Short binasal prong in Premature, Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Extubation, sponsored by Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to participants aged 24 Hours to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-08.

Sponsored by Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
24 Hours to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Nowadays, the use of non-invasive ventilation for preterm infants in the NICU has increased to avoid complications associated with prolonged endotracheal intubation. Adequate pressure delivery through non-invasive ventilation is essential, as it enhances the growth and development of premature lungs. Various interfaces have been used to ensure proper sealing. The RAM cannula, used as an interface for non-invasive respiratory support in preterm neonates, is associated with reduced nasal trauma compared to short binasal prongs (SBPs), due to its softer material, making it a safer option. However, the RAM cannula has been shown to deliver lower pharyngeal pressure and, therefore, may not maintain airway pressure as consistently as nasal prongs. Currently, limited data is available regarding the efficacy of nasal prongs compared to the RAM cannula as a post-extubation interface for non-invasive ventilation support in preterm infants. Additionally, we have observed that the use of the RAM cannula for non-invasive ventilation in preterm infants is associated with a longer duration of oxygen therapy compared to SBPs.

The investigators hypothesize that the RAM cannula provides a lower level of positive end-expiratory pressure compared to SBPs during non-invasive ventilation.

The investigators aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the RAM cannula versus SBPs as nasal interfaces for post-extubation non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants.

Read the detailed description

Preterm infants will be randomized to receive post-extubation non invasive respiratory support either through RAM cannula or SBPs. Neonates in both groups will be uniformly managed as per unit protocol as following:

Extubation criteria :

  • Birth weight \< 1000 gram :MAP \<7 cmH2O and FIO2 \<0.30
  • Birth weight>1000 gram :MAP >8 cmH2O and FIO2 \<0.30

Re intubation criteria :

  • FIO2>0.60 to maintain SaO2 >88% OR PaO2 > 45 mmHg
  • PaCO2 {arterial} > 55-60 with PH \< 7.25
  • Apnea and requiring bag and mask ventilation
  • Evidence of increased work of breathing {retractions -grunting -chest wall distortion } plus abnormal chest x ray
02

Conditions studied

  • Premature
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome
  • Extubation

Keywords

  • nasal interface
  • noninvasive respiratory support
  • premature
  • RAM cannula
  • Chest ultrasound
  • Diaphragm
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is close to the median of 84 across 1,666 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
24 Hours to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inborn preterm neonates ≤ 32 weeks of gestational and/or birth weight ≤1500 g with respiratory distress syndrome requiring initial invasive ventilation support for at least 24 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Outborn preterm neonates
  • Major congenital malformations.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    RAM cannula group

    Preterm infants will receive non-invasive ventilation by RAM cannula

    Other: RAM cannula

  • Active comparator
    Short binasal prong group

    Preterm infants will receive non-invasive ventilation by short binasal prongs

    Other: Short binasal prong

Interventions

  • OtherRAM cannula

    RAM cannula as an interface for non invasive ventilation in preterm newborns

  • OtherShort binasal prong

    Short binasal prong as an interface for non invasive ventilation in preterm newborns

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Failure of extubation incidence rate

    Need for reintubation within 72 hours post-extubation trial

    Time frame: 28 days of an infant's life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of non-invasive ventilation

    Days on non-invasive ventilation

    Time frame: 120 days

  2. whole duration of oxygen therapy

    Days on oxygen therapy during NICU admission

    Time frame: 120 days

  3. Diaphragmatic indices and lung ultrasound scores post-extubation (pre & post extubation then weekly)

    Diaphragmatic indices (diaphragmatic thickness \&excursion) and lung ultrasound scores post-extubation

    Time frame: 120 days

  4. Need for reintubation within 7 days

    Need for reintubation within 72 hours post-extubation trial

    Time frame: 28 days of an infant's life

  5. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Time frame: 120 days

  6. Mortality

    Pre-discharge mortality

    Time frame: 120 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gokce IK, Kaya H, Ozdemir R. A randomized trial comparing the short binasal prong to the RAM cannula for noninvasive ventilation support of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun;34(12):1868-1874. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651268. Epub 2019 Aug 8. PubMed 31394948 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers for research and scientific purposes (i.e conduction of meta-analysis or systematic review). Data or samples shared will be coded, with no protected health information included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Data requests can be submitted starting 3 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 12 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis

Access criteria: Access to raw data (no protected health information) can be requested by qualified researchers for scientific purposes, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA)

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07113535
Lead sponsor
Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia
Responsible party
hussam murayh mohammed ali (Fellow of Neonatal- perinatal medicine, NICU, Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
Start date
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 8, 2025

Study contacts

Ohoud Almoualled, Dr
Contact
o.doc2or@gmail.com
+966500550679
Nehad Nasef, Dr
Contact
Nehad Nasef, Dr
principal investigator · King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Medical City

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion