ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07112560FALSSEUpdated Aug 8, 2025

Early Detection and Prevention of Amblyopia and Visual Impairment Through Systematic Pediatric Vision Screening

An observational study in Amblyopia, sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 7 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-08.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
40
Ages
3 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Amblyopia, characterized by reduced visual acuity, develops in childhood due to insufficient sensory stimulation of the affected eye. It is the leading cause of low vision and loss of stereoscopic vision in both children and adults. Currently, 99 million people worldwide are affected, with recent projections indicating 222 million by 2040. Amblyopia can result from anisometropia (70%), strabismus (30%), or the presence of an ocular pathology (1%). Early management of these conditions (before the age of 7) can prevent the onset of amblyopia. Therefore, screening for these conditions is a major public health challenge to reduce the prevalence and associated costs of visual impairment.

The French-speaking Association of Strabology and Pediatric Ophthalmology (AFSOP) recommends systematic amblyopia screening for 3-year-old children. This screening involves measuring monocular visual acuity in both eyes (LEA chart at 3 meters), checking for strabismus (cover/uncover test), and performing a stereoscopic vision test (e.g., Lang I test).

Amblyopia is currently underdiagnosed for two main reasons: 1) it is often asymptomatic (75% of cases) and therefore cannot be detected without systematic screening; and 2) there is significant difficulty in accessing medical care in certain regions, and thus access to professionals capable of performing this screening (doctors, orthoptists). The difficulty in accessing healthcare professionals capable of screening for amblyopia in children aged 3 to 7 has already been raised.

We believe it would be beneficial to have an alternative screening method that is equivalent to the AFSOP-recommended method and accessible in areas with limited healthcare professionals. An eye-tracking system implemented in a virtual reality (VR) headset has recently been developed for monitoring eye movements. This system has shown effectiveness in rehabilitating visual field impairments in patients with traumatic brain injury. The system allows for remote monitoring of rehabilitation sessions, and data can be downloaded and viewed remotely via Wi-Fi.

The main objective of this study will be to estimate the sensitivity of the new VR-based eye-tracking screening method amblyopia screening method using an eye-tracking system implemented in a virtual reality headset compared to standard screening in children aged 3 to 7 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amblyopia

Keywords

  • Amblyopia
  • Visual impairment
  • New method for amblyopia screening
  • Pediatric amblyopia screening
  • Eye Tracking system
03

In context

Amblyopia

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Amblyopia; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 156 across 39 observational studies indexed under Amblyopia.

Browse Amblyopia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France is the lead sponsor of 999 studies on the registry; 358 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children aged 3 to 7 years, including both amblyopic and non-amblyopic patients. All participants are recruited from the Ophthalmology Department of Strasbourg University Hospital (CHU Strasbourg) or referred by their ophthalmologists.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 3 to 7 years at the time of consent signing.
  • Patients followed in the Ophthalmology Department of Strasbourg University Hospital (CHU Strasbourg).
  • Holders of parental authority must be affiliated with or beneficiaries of the health insurance system.
  • Holders of parental authority must be capable of understanding the objectives and risks related to the research, and able to provide dated and signed .
  • Amblyopic patients must have amblyopia diagnosed by the reference screening method.
  • Non-amblyopic patients must have undergone routine screening confirming the absence of amblyopia or any other ocular condition that could lead to amblyopia.
  • Screening must be performed in the Ophthalmology Department of CHU Strasbourg, unless a prior screening has been performed according to established guidelines and fully documented in a report by the patient's ophthalmologist (detailed results of the three standard screening tests).
  • The screening examination must have been performed within the three months prior to the signing of the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Amblyopic children currently undergoing treatment or having previously received treatment for amblyopia (optical correction, strabismus surgery, occlusion therapy, orthoptic rehabilitation).
  • Children presenting conditions or states that may cause side effects related to the use of the virtual reality headset (epilepsy, neurological or developmental disorders, autism spectrum disorders, dizziness, nausea, claustrophobia, etc.).
  • Inability to provide informed information to the patient or holders of parental authority (emergency situations, difficulties in patient comprehension, etc.).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Amblyopic patient

    Patient aged between 3 and 7 years, with amblyopia diagnosed by standard reference screening within the three months preceding the signing of the informed consent form.

    Diagnostic Test: Standard screening procedure for amblyopia · Diagnostic Test: New amblyopia screening method using a virtual reality headset.

  • Non Amblyopic patient

    Patient aged between 3 and 7 years, non-amblyopic, who underwent routine screening confirming the absence of amblyopia or any other ocular condition that could lead to amblyopia, within the three months prior to signing the informed consent form.

    Diagnostic Test: Standard screening procedure for amblyopia · Diagnostic Test: New amblyopia screening method using a virtual reality headset.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testStandard screening procedure for amblyopia

    The standard examination for amblyopia screening consists of three steps: A monocular visual acuity assessment using optotypes from the LEA scale, presented from the simplest to the most complex in front of each eye via an alternating occlusion mask. A cover/uncover test, during which the child is required to fixate on an image A Lang I stereopsis test performed under binocular vision.

  • Diagnostic testNew amblyopia screening method using a virtual reality headset.

    The examination with the virtual reality headset consists of three main steps: A monocular visual acuity assessment using optotypes from the LEA scale, presented from the simplest to the most complex in front of each eye via an alternating occlusion mask. The eye-tracking system analyzes fixation and the visual response of the stimulated eye. A cover/uncover test, during which the child is required to fixate on an image projected inside the headset. Eye movements are tracked to detect any deviations or abnormalities in ocular coordination. A Lang I stereopsis test performed under binocular vision, in which the child must identify three-dimensional images hidden within a virtual board. The eye-tracking system detects fixation on the images and allows evaluation of depth perception

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of a new amblyopia screening method compared to standard screening

    Sensitivity of a new amblyopia screening method using an eye-tracking system implemented in a virtual reality headset, compared to standard screening, in children aged 3 to 7 years. Sensitivity = (true positives) / (false negatives + true positives)

    Time frame: At enrollment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Specificity of the eye-tracking system compared to standard screening

    Specificity of the eye-tracking system implemented in a virtual reality headset, compared to standard screening in children aged 3 to 7 years. Specificity = (true negatives) / (false positives + true negatives)

    Time frame: At enrollment.

  2. Sensitivity and specificity of the eye-tracking system compared to the same tests performed during standard screening

    These are respectively: Monocular visual acuity of both eyes measured using the LEA symbol scale at 3 meters, presented via the virtual reality interface. Presence or absence of a refixation movement during the cover/uncover test for strabismus screening. Presence or absence of stereoscopic vision anomalies evaluated by projecting a Lang I test under binocular vision within the virtual reality headset.

    Time frame: At enrollment.

  3. Cover/uncover test for strabismus screening : angle of deviation

    The angle of deviation of movement of each eye (refixation movement) will be recorded using a cover/uncover test combined with monocular stimulation

    Time frame: At enrollment.

  4. Proportion of adverse events recorded during the diagnostic process

    The proportion of adverse events will be recorded by the investigator accompanying the child during the examination with the virtual reality system across all study groups. In particular, adverse events related to the use of the virtual reality headset will be documented (nausea, discomfort, photophobia, seizure).

    Time frame: Day of the diagnostic examination (Day 1)

  5. Proportion of patients unable to complete the scheduled examination using the virtual reality headset

    The proportion of patients unable to complete the scheduled examination using the virtual reality headset for any reason (including refusal to wear the headset, anxiety, or other factors) will be documented. This will include the number of patients for whom the examination could not be performed due to these reasons.

    Time frame: Day of the diagnostic examination (Day 1)

  6. Cover/uncover test for strabismus screening : direction

    The direction of movement of each eye will be recorded using a cover/uncover test combined with monocular stimulation

    Time frame: At enrollment

  7. Cover/uncover test for strabismus screening : velocity

    The velocity of movement of each eye (refixation movement) will be recorded using a cover/uncover test combined with monocular stimulation

    Time frame: At enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Misawa M, Bajin IY, Zhang B, Daibert-Nido M, Tchao D, Garcia-Giler E, Cheung K, Appel L, Nasir P, Reginald A, Tabori U, Bartels U, Ramaswamy V, Markowitz SN, Bouffet E, Reber M. A telerehabilitation program to improve visual perception in children and adolescents with hemianopia consecutive to a brain tumor: a single-arm feasibility and proof-of-concept trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 29;78:102955. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102955. eCollection 2024 Dec. PubMed 39687429 ↗
  • Daibert-Nido M, Pyatova Y, Cheung K, Nayomi C, Markowitz SN, Bouffet E, Reber M. Case Report: Visual Rehabilitation in Hemianopia Patients. Home-Based Visual Rehabilitation in Patients With Hemianopia Consecutive to Brain Tumor Treatment: Feasibility and Potential Effectiveness. Front Neurol. 2021 Jul 21;12:680211. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.680211. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34354660 ↗
  • Bois C, Milcent K, Dufourg M, Charles M. Bilan de santé des enfants de 3-4 ans en école maternelle par la Protection Maternelle Infantile en 2014-2016 : disparités départementales des pratiques. Bulletin Epidémiologique Hebdomadaire. Janvier 2020
  • Lequeux L, Thouvenin D, Couret C, Audren F, Costet C, Dureau P, Leruez S, Defoordt-Dhellemmes S, Daien V, Espinasse Berrod MA, Arsene S, Lebranchu P, Denis D, Bui-Quoc E, Speeg-Schatz C. [Vision screening for children: Recommended practices from AFSOP]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Feb;44(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Dec 30. French. PubMed 33388188 ↗
  • Kaur S, Sharda S, Aggarwal H, Dadeya S. Comprehensive review of amblyopia: Types and management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;71(7):2677-2686. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_338_23. PubMed 37417105 ↗
  • Fu Z, Hong H, Su Z, Lou B, Pan CW, Liu H. Global prevalence of amblyopia and disease burden projections through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;104(8):1164-1170. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314759. Epub 2019 Nov 8. PubMed 31704700 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2025; primary completion for Sep 2026, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 9, 2025
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
StartEst.
Sep 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 2026
Last update
Aug 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07112560
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
Start date
Sep 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 8, 2025

Study contacts

Léa DORMEGNY
Contact
lea.dormegny@chru-strasbourg.fr
0613325143 ext. +33
Lauriana SOLECKI
Contact
lauriana.solecki@chru-strasbourg.fr
0369550939 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion