CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07097025VNS TRD HG-TRDUpdated Aug 5, 2025

2-Year Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Higher-Grade Treatment-Resistant Depression: Clinical Outcomes and Policy Recommendation

An observational study in Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD), Depression - Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression, sponsored by Dr.Yoav Domany. Completed at 2 sites in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-05.

Sponsored by Dr.Yoav Domany · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) intervention can reduce depressive symptoms and suicidality in adults with higher-grade treatment-resistant depression (HG-TRD)-individuals who have not responded to at least four prior depression treatments.

The main questions it aims to answer are: does VNS lead to a meaningful and sustained reduction in depression severity over 24 months? and does VNS reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors in this population?

Participants in this study were adults (age ≥ 18) with chronic or recurrent depression and at least four failed prior treatments, including medication, psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), or esketamine. They underwent surgical implantation of a VNS device and their depressive symptoms and suicidality assessed at baseline, and then again at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months using the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The study includes continous follow-upvisits and VNS device adjustments for 2 years post implantation. with outcomes including treatment response, remission, changes in suicidal ideation, and psychiatric hospitalization days over the study period

Read the detailed description

This prospective, multi-center observational study aimed to evaluate the long-term real-world effectiveness, safety, and clinical utility of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in individuals diagnosed with higher-grade treatment-resistant depression (HG-TRD), defined by failure to respond to at least four adequate therapeutic interventions. The study was conducted in three Israeli psychiatric centers between 2020 and 2025.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is a neuromodulation therapy involving the surgical implantation of a device that delivers electrical stimulation to the vagus nerve, targeting brain regions associated with mood regulation. While VNS is approved in several countries for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), real-world data outside of structured clinical trials for TRD remain limited. This study sought to fill that gap, particularly in the Israeli healthcare context.

Study Population and Procedures

Eligible participants were adults with chronic or recurrent major depressive episodes, who had previously failed at least four depression treatments (e.g., pharmacotherapy, Electro-Convulsive Treatment (ECT), esketamine, psychotherapy). Participants underwent VNS implantation and were followed prospectively for 24 months. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, evaluating depression severity, suicidality, and adverse effects using standardized clinical tool, the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

Device programming and stimulation adjustments were conducted biweekly in the early phases post-implantation and subsequently as clinically indicated. Stimulation parameters were titrated based on clinical response and tolerability.

Data were collected in dedicated TRD specialty clinics and recorded by trained raters using structured clinical forms. All assessments were performed in-person during scheduled follow-up visits.

The study was approved by the institutional Helsinki committees at all participating sites. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Statistical Plan and Handling of Data:

  • Sample Size: The final sample included 16 participants who completed 24-month follow-up and were eligible for efficacy analyses. All 19 implanted patients were included in safety analyses.
  • Primary analysis involved repeated measures ANOVA to examine changes in MADRS total scores over time.
  • Categorical outcomes (response, remission, partial response) were computed at each time-point and cumulatively (best outcome achieved at any time).
  • Suicidality was analyzed via MADRS item 10, both as a continuous and categorical outcome (≥50% or ≥30% reduction).
  • Hospitalization burden was analyzed as an exploratory outcome, comparing inpatient days during three time intervals (pre-implantation, year 1 post-implantation, year 2 post-implantation).
  • Missing data: Participants who permanently deactivated the device within the first 6 months were excluded from efficacy analyses but retained for safety reporting. Missing values in the MADRS and item 10 of this tool (suicidality) were imputed using the last observation carried forward method. Imputation was performed in the case of a missing value between two measurement points, but was not done after the last measurement point (for example, if a participant had values up to month 12, imputing was not done for month 18).

Safety Assessment:

Adverse events were monitored throughout the study and including voice alteration, throat discomfort, and coughing, as well as rarer complications such as dysphagia or transient vocal cord paresis. All adverse events were documented in accordance with clinical research guidelines.

02

Conditions studied

  • Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
  • Depression - Major Depressive Disorder
  • Bipolar Depression

Keywords

  • TRD
  • VNS
  • MDD
  • Suicidality
  • depression
  • policy
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

461 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; 148 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 64 across 50 observational studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dr.Yoav Domany as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants were recruited under the care of the participating physician investigators, from the Advanced Treatments for TRD Clinics at Sheba Medical Center (n=10, 62.5% of participants), or and Lev-Hasharon mental health center (n=6, 37.5% of participants).

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnose of chronic and recurrent depressive episode lasting at least two years (persistent depressive disorder) or a history of at least three depressive episodes, including the current episode, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria.
  • Resistance to treatment was defined as failure to respond to at least four antidepressant treatments, including pharmacotherapy (administered at therapeutic dosages for at least four weeks), psychotherapy, Electroconvulsive treatment (ECT), or esketamine meaning HD-TRD.
  • Baseline scores >20 according to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (indicating moderate (20-34) to severe (>34) depression).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lifetime history of psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and other) or psychotic features during the current depressive episode.
  • Lifetime history of rapid-cycling bipolar disorder.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
19 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
24 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) patients

    Participants were recruited under the care of the participating physician investigators, from the Advanced Treatments for Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) Clinics at Sheba Medical Center, or Lev-Hasharon mental health center , who underwent VNS implantation procedure. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years; Diagnose of chronic and recurrent depressive episode lasting at least two years (persistent depressive disorder) or a history of at least three depressive episodes, including the current episode, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) criteria; Resistance to treatment was defined as failure to respond to at least four antidepressant treatments, including pharmacotherapy (administered at therapeutic dosages for at least four weeks), psychotherapy, ECT, or esketamine meaning HD-TRD; Baseline scores \>20 according to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)(indicating moderate (20-34) to severe (\>34) depression).

    Device: vagus nerve stimulation

Interventions

  • Devicevagus nerve stimulation

    VNS is a neuromodulatory treatment involving implantation of a subcutaneous device that delivers intermittent electrical stimulation to the vagus nerve, modulating central pathways associated with mood regulation.

    Also known as: VNS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Depression Severity (MADRS Total Score)

    Change in depressive symptom severity, as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. The scale consists of 10 clinician-rated items, each scored from 0 to 6, with total scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (severe depression). A reduction in score indicates clinical improvement. Depression severity was assessed at baseline and at predefined follow-up visits (6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-implantation). The primary outcome reflects the magnitude and trajectory of change in MADRS scores over time following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) implantation.

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months post-implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Suicidality (MADRS Item 10 Score)

    Change in suicidality as measured by item 10 of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which assesses suicidal thoughts and behaviors on a 0-6 scale. A reduction in score indicates clinical improvement. The outcome captures both point-in-time and cumulative reductions in suicidality over the course of 24 months following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) implantation.

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months post-implantation

  2. Rates of Remission, Response, and Partial Response

    Proportion of participants achieving clinical improvement at predefined follow-up timepoints (6, 12, 18, and 24 months) and cumulatively (i.e., best outcome achieved at any point during follow-up), based on changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score: * Remission: MADRS total score ≤12 * Response: ≥50% reduction in MADRS total score from baseline * Partial Response: 30%-49% reduction in MADRS total score from baseline Each participant was categorized based on the highest level of improvement attained at each timepoint. These outcomes reflect clinically meaningful levels of symptom reduction following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) implantation.

    Time frame: 6 to 24 months post-implantation

  3. Safety - Incidence and Nature of Adverse Events

    Incidence, type, severity, and time course of adverse events related to VNS implantation and stimulation, including surgical complications and stimulation-related side effects. Adverse events were documented throughout the 24-month follow-up period and categorized by clinical severity (e.g., mild, moderate, serious), duration, and management strategies (e.g., stimulation adjustment, discontinuation).

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months post-implantation

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Psychiatric Hospitalization Days

    Change in the number of psychiatric inpatient hospitalization days before and after VNS implantation. Hospitalization burden was calculated for each participant across three time intervals: (1) 12 months pre-implantation, (2) first 12 months post-implantation, and (3) second 12 months post-implantation. Mean hospitalization days per period were compared to assess potential reductions in inpatient care burden following VNS therapy.

    Time frame: 1 year pre-implantation to 2 years post-implantation

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Maaynei Hayeshua medical center
    Bnei Brak, 5154475, Israel
  • Lev Hasharon Medical Center
    Netanya, 4281000, Israel
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rush AJ, Conway CR, Aaronson ST, George MS, Riva-Posse P, Dunner DL, Zajecka J, Bunker MT, Quevedo J, Allen RM, Alva G, Luing H, Nahas Z, Manu L, Bennett JI, Mickey BJ, Becker J, Sheline Y, Cusin C, Murrough JW, Reeves K, Rosenquist PB, Lee YL, Majewski S, Way J, Olin B, Sackeim HA. Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on daily function and quality of life in markedly treatment-resistant major depression: Findings from a one-year, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2025 May-Jun;18(3):690-700. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1187. Epub 2024 Dec 18. PubMed 39701918 ↗
  • Aaronson ST, Sears P, Ruvuna F, Bunker M, Conway CR, Dougherty DD, Reimherr FW, Schwartz TL, Zajecka JM. A 5-Year Observational Study of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Treated With Vagus Nerve Stimulation or Treatment as Usual: Comparison of Response, Remission, and Suicidality. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):640-648. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16010034. Epub 2017 Mar 31. PubMed 28359201 ↗
  • Rush AJ, Conway CR, Aaronson ST. Cost-effectiveness of VNS therapy for difficult-to-treat depression: insights from the RECOVER trial. J Affect Disord. 2024. In Press.
  • Conway CR, Aaronson ST, Greenberg BD, Carpenter LL, Holbert RC, Bunker M, et al. RECOVER VNS Depression Study: One-year outcomes of a randomized, controlled trial. Biol Psychiatry. 2024. In Press.
  • Lynch F, Law CW, McIntyre RS. Vagus nerve stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: efficacy, side effects, and future prospects. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(10):1041-55.
  • Cusin C, Dougherty DD. Somatic therapies for treatment-resistant depression: ECT, TMS, VNS, DBS. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2012 Aug 17;2:14. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-2-14. PubMed 22901565 ↗
  • Strawbridge R, Carter B, Marwood L, Bandelow B, Tsapekos D, Nikolova VL, Taylor R, Mantingh T, de Angel V, Patrick F, Cleare AJ, Young AH. Augmentation therapies for treatment-resistant depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;214(1):42-51. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.233. Epub 2018 Nov 20. PubMed 30457075 ↗
  • Rush AJ, Sackeim HA, Conway CR, Bunker MT, Hollon SD, Demyttenaere K, Young AH, Aaronson ST, Dibue M, Thase ME, McAllister-Williams RH. Clinical research challenges posed by difficult-to-treat depression. Psychol Med. 2022 Feb;52(3):419-432. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004943. Epub 2022 Jan 7. PubMed 34991768 ↗
  • Lam RW, Milev R, Rotzinger S, Andreazza AC, Blier P, Brenner C, et al. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2023 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Section 5. Difficult-to-treat depression. Can J Psychiatry. 2024;69(2):95-120.
  • McAllister-Williams RH, Arango C, Blier P, Demyttenaere K, Falkai P, Gorwood P, Hopwood M, Javed A, Kasper S, Malhi GS, Soares JC, Vieta E, Young AH, Papadopoulos A, Rush AJ. The identification, assessment and management of difficult-to-treat depression: An international consensus statement. J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 15;267:264-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.02.023. Epub 2020 Feb 7. PubMed 32217227 ↗
  • Perez-Sola V, Roca M, Alonso J, Gabilondo A, Hernando T, Sicras-Mainar A, Sicras-Navarro A, Herrera B, Vieta E. Economic impact of treatment-resistant depression: A retrospective observational study. J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:578-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.036. Epub 2021 Aug 27. PubMed 34509073 ↗
  • Fava M. Diagnosis and definition of treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Apr 15;53(8):649-59. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00231-2. PubMed 12706951 ↗
  • Otte C, Gold SM, Penninx BW, Pariante CM, Etkin A, Fava M, Mohr DC, Schatzberg AF. Major depressive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Sep 15;2:16065. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.65. PubMed 27629598 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data (IPD) might not be shared due to concerns regarding participant confidentiality and the sensitive nature of the clinical data. The study involves a small cohort of individuals with severe, treatment-resistant depression, and the risk of re-identification cannot be fully mitigated, even with de-identification procedures.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07097025
Lead sponsor
Dr.Yoav Domany
Collaborators
Lev HaSharon Mental Health Center, Maaynei Hayesha Medical Center
Responsible party
Dr.Yoav Domany (Psychiatrist, Department Manager, Maaynei Hayesha Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Last update
Aug 5, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion