CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07088120Updated Mar 11, 2026

PRECISION-CPR: PRecision-Controlled Ventilation in CPR

An interventional study of Precision-Controlled Ventilation with Real-Time Feedback and Standard Manual Ventilation During CPR in Cardiac Arrest (CA), sponsored by Rush University Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-11.

Sponsored by Rush University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
852
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening emergency that requires immediate treatment with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). While chest compressions circulate blood, manual ventilation provides oxygen to the patient. Current CPR guidelines recommend specific ventilation rates and tidal volumes, but studies show that clinicians often deliver too much or too little ventilation due to a lack of monitoring tools, potentially reducing the effectiveness of CPR and impacting survival.

The PRECISION-CPR study is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether using real-time feedback devices to precisely control ventilation during CPR can improve patient outcomes. Adult patients experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest will be randomized to receive either standard manual ventilation guided by clinician experience or precision-controlled ventilation tailored to the patient's predicted body weight using real-time monitoring devices.

The primary outcome of the study will be return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Secondary outcomes will include survival to hospital discharge, neurological recovery, and other clinical measures. By addressing the limitations of current ventilation practices, this study aims to generate evidence to guide future resuscitation guidelines and improve survival rates after cardiac arrest.

Read the detailed description

The PRECISION-CPR trial is a prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of precision-controlled ventilation on outcomes during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in adult in-hospital cardiac arrest. The study aims to determine whether the use of real-time feedback devices to guide tidal volume (6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight) and respiratory rate (10 breaths per minute) improves return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and other clinical outcomes.

Participants are randomized 1:1 to either:

Intervention Group: Manual ventilation guided by real-time feedback device providing continuous tidal volume and respiratory rate feedback during CPR.

Control Group: Manual ventilation performed per standard care without feedback, with the same devices used in blinded mode to record but not display ventilation data.

Ventilation parameters are recorded breath-by-breath. Hemodynamic and clinical variables (e.g., heart rate, end-tidal CO₂) are obtained from the electronic medical record and time-synchronized with ventilation data. Data are collected in REDCap and monitored by a central coordinating center. A Data Safety Monitoring Board oversees safety, protocol adherence, and interim analyses.

The study uses a parallel assignment model and includes stratified randomization by center. Detailed eligibility criteria and outcome measures are recorded in their respective ClinicalTrials.gov sections. The trial is powered to detect differences in ROSC and includes prespecified secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses. The protocol includes quality assurance procedures, interim analyses, and real-time feedback training for clinical teams to ensure intervention fidelity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest (CA)

Keywords

  • ventilation
  • tidal volume
  • cardiac pulmonary resuscitation
  • real-time feedback
  • Return of spontaneous circulation
03

In context

Heart Arrest

966 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Arrest; 227 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 852 is above the median of 100 across 557 interventional studies indexed under Heart Arrest.

Browse Heart Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

Rush University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 394 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Of its 30 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (18 years or older) with in-hospital cardiac arrest receiving manual ventilation via bag-mask or artificial airway

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to estimate predicted body weight (e.g., extreme body habitus or lack of height data).
  • Patients receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO).
  • Known pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
852 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Precision-Controlled Ventilation with Real-Time Feedback

    Patients will receive manual ventilation during CPR using real-time feedback devices (EOlife) to guide tidal volume (6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight) and ventilation rate (10 breaths per minute) delivery, ensuring adherence to guideline-recommended ventilation parameters.

    Device: Precision-Controlled Ventilation with Real-Time Feedback

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care Ventilation During CPR

    Patients will receive manual ventilation during CPR per standard practice without real-time feedback, using clinician judgment for tidal volume (visible chest rise) and ventilation rate, consistent with American Heart Association guidelines.

    Other: Standard Manual Ventilation During CPR

Interventions

  • DevicePrecision-Controlled Ventilation with Real-Time Feedback

    Manual ventilation during CPR using a real-time feedback device (EOlife, Archeon Medical) to guide the delivery of tidal volumes (6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight) and ventilation rate (10 breaths per minute). The device measures and displays ventilation parameters in real time, helping providers achieve guideline-recommended targets during resuscitation.

  • OtherStandard Manual Ventilation During CPR

    Manual ventilation during CPR without real-time feedback, using clinician judgment to guide tidal volume (visible chest rise) and ventilation rate, consistent with American Heart Association guidelines.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)

    Documented presence of a palpable pulse and measurable blood pressure during resuscitation after initiation of CPR.

    Time frame: During resuscitation (up to 60 minutes after cardiac arrest onset)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Survival to Hospital Discharge

    Survival of the patient to hospital discharge following the index cardiac arrest event during which CPR and the study intervention were delivered.

    Time frame: Through hospital discharge (up to 28 days after enrollment)

  2. Neurological Status at Hospital Discharge

    Neurological function assessed using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score at the time of hospital discharge, categorized as favorable (CPC 1-2) or unfavorable (CPC 3-5).

    Time frame: At time of hospital discharge (up to 28 days after CPR event)

  3. Time to Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC)

    Time interval from initiation of CPR to achievement of documented ROSC, defined as the presence of a palpable pulse and measurable blood pressure.

    Time frame: From initiation of CPR to termination of resuscitation efforts (up to 60 minutes after CPR initiation)

  4. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Total number of days the patient receives invasive mechanical ventilation during the index hospitalization following cardiac arrest.

    Time frame: From intubation until extubation or hospital discharge, up to 60 days.

  5. Length of ICU Stay

    Total length of stay in the intensive care unit during the index hospitalization following cardiac arrest.

    Time frame: From ICU admission until ICU discharge, up to 60 days.

  6. New Occurrence of Pneumothorax During CPR

    Incidence of newly diagnosed pneumothorax occurring during CPR and resuscitation efforts, confirmed by clinical assessment and imaging if available.

    Time frame: During resuscitation (up to 60 minutes after cardiac arrest onset)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde, University of Guadalajara
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44280, Mexico
    • Miguel Ibarra-Estrada, MD · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kim JW, Park SO, Lee KR, Hong DY, Baek KJ. Efficacy of Amflow(R), a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study. Emerg Med Int. 2020 Apr 24;2020:5296519. doi: 10.1155/2020/5296519. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32377436 ↗
  • Lee ED, Jang YD, Kang JH, Seo YS, Yoon YS, Kim YW, Jeong WB, Ji JG. Effect of a Real-Time Audio Ventilation Feedback Device on the Survival Rate and Outcomes of Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 18;12(18):6023. doi: 10.3390/jcm12186023. PubMed 37762963 ↗
  • Drennan IR, Lee M, Heroux JP, Lee A, Riches J, Peppler J, Poitras A, Cheskes S. The impact of real-time feedback on ventilation quality during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A before-and-after study. Resuscitation. 2024 Nov;204:110381. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110381. Epub 2024 Sep 18. PubMed 39299509 ↗
  • Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, Boehme AK, Buxton AE, Carson AP, Commodore-Mensah Y, Elkind MSV, Evenson KR, Eze-Nliam C, Ferguson JF, Generoso G, Ho JE, Kalani R, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Levine DA, Lewis TT, Liu J, Loop MS, Ma J, Mussolino ME, Navaneethan SD, Perak AM, Poudel R, Rezk-Hanna M, Roth GA, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Thacker EL, VanWagner LB, Virani SS, Voecks JH, Wang NY, Yaffe K, Martin SS. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26. PubMed 35078371 ↗
  • Algahtani AI, Scott JB, Li J. Ventilation and Oxygenation During and After Adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Changing Paradigms. Respir Care. 2024 Nov 18;69(12):1573-1586. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12427. PubMed 39288964 ↗
  • Scott JB, Schneider JM, Schneider K, Li J. An evaluation of manual tidal volume and respiratory rate delivery during simulated resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;45:446-450. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.091. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PubMed 33077312 ↗
  • Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabanas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, Kudenchuk PJ, Kurz MC, Lavonas EJ, Morley PT, O'Neil BJ, Peberdy MA, Rittenberger JC, Rodriguez AJ, Sawyer KN, Berg KM; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916. Epub 2020 Oct 21. No abstract available. PubMed 33081529 ↗
  • Becker LB, Aufderheide TP, Graham R. Strategies to Improve Survival From Cardiac Arrest: A Report From the Institute of Medicine. JAMA. 2015 Jul 21;314(3):223-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8454. No abstract available. PubMed 26132709 ↗
  • Moskowitz A, Grossestreuer AV, Berg KM, Patel PV, Ganley S, Casasola Medrano M, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW; Center for Resuscitation Science. The association between tidal volume and neurological outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018 Mar;124:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.12.031. Epub 2017 Dec 29. PubMed 29292026 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — We do not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) outside the study team due to institutional policies, data privacy regulations, and the sensitive nature of cardiac arrest data. Aggregate de-identified results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07088120
Lead sponsor
Rush University Medical Center
Responsible party
Jie Li (Professor, Rush University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2025
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 11, 2026

Study contacts

JIE LI, PhD
Contact
jie_li@rush.edu
13125634643
Brady Scott, PhD
Contact
Jonathan_B_Scott@rush.edu
(312) 942-6389

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion