ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07087977Updated May 6, 2026

HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra

An interventional study of HoYAG laser and TFL laser platform in Nephrolithiasis and Kidney Stone, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.

Primary conditionKidney CalculiRegistry: NephrolithiasisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Nephrolithiasis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Kidney Calculi
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Kidney Calculi, a narrower term within Nephrolithiasis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is the treatment of choice for kidney stones over 2cm. This procedure commonly uses laser energy for breaking the stones, and among possible laser platforms, Hoyag and thulium fiber laser are FDA approved. Recently, this procedure has also included the use of vacuum assisted renal access sheaths, which allows suction to be employed together with the breaking of stones. This study intends to compare outcomes when using either laser platforms with suction sheaths in participants undergoing mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stones.

Read the detailed description

Due to the reduced diameter sheath of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (miniPCNL), surgical outcomes commonly rely on stone fragmentation provided by a laser energy source. Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (HoYAG) has long been considered the gold-standard for lithotripsy, but this position has been challenged by the introduction of the thulium fiber laser (TFL) since its approval for clinical use in 2017. In the same manner, the recently developed ClearPetra™(MicroTech Endoscopy®, China) vacuum-assisted renal access sheath (VA-RAS) is a novel technology that allows for concomitant irrigation and suction during the procedure.

No prior studies to date have exclusively investigated mini-PCNL outcomes with Ho:YAG and TFL when using VA-RAS. This study addresses the literature paucity regarding the outcomes when utilizing the high-power Ho:YAG with MOSES technology vs. TFL in mini-PCNL with VA-RAS. This study hypothesizes that the Ho:YAG may provide more efficient stone clearance, secondary to its superior ability to fragment stones when compared to the TLF laser, which primarily dusts despite the laser settings utilized.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Kidney Stone

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Nephrolithiasis
  • Kidney Stone
  • ClearPetra
  • HoYAG
  • TFL
03

In context

Kidney Calculi Reclassified

509 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Calculi; 146 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 86 across 391 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Calculi.

Browse Kidney Calculi studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 492 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Compared within Kidney Calculi, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Nephrolithiasis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females over 18 years of age
  2. Patients with kidney stones, with stone burden larger than 15 mm.
  3. Patients undergoing new percutaneous access with primary, supine, unilateral mini-PCNL.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Simultaneous use of more than 1 laser platform or other form of fragmentation (e.g., ultrasonic).
  2. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of contralateral kidney stones during the same procedure.
  3. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of ureteral stones during the same procedure.
  4. Pregnant patients.
  5. Presence of genitourinary anatomical abnormalities.
  6. Uncorrected coagulopathy.
  7. External urinary catheters.
  8. patients.
  9. Non-elective procedures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    MiniPCNL with HoYAG

    In Arm 1, participants will undergo miniPCNL with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with HoYAG laser platform. Participants will undergo miniPCNL per standard of care

    Device: HoYAG laser

  • Active comparator
    MiniPCNL with TFL

    In Arm 2, participants will undergo miniPCNL with ClearPetra™ vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath with TFL laser platform. Participants will undergo miniPCNL per standard of care

    Device: TFL laser platform

Interventions

  • DeviceHoYAG laser

    Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG laser or TFL laser group for miniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

  • DeviceTFL laser platform

    Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG or TFL laser group for MiniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stone Lithotripsy time between HoYAG and TFL

    Time from scope insertion to scope removal

    Time frame: Procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total operative time between HoYAG and TFL

    Time from time-out to procedure finish

    Time frame: Procedure

  2. Stone Free Status between ClearPetra and traditional approach

    Stone free is defined as no residual stones larger than 2mm in post operative CT scan

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. Laser Energy

    Laser efficiency will be measured by evaluating the laser energy in kilojoules used during the procedure.

    Time frame: Procedure

  4. Laser Time

    Laser efficiency will be measured by evaluating the time in minutes the laser was used during the procedure.

    Time frame: Procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li P, Huang Z, Sun X, Yang T, Wang G, Jiang Y, Ke C, Li J. Comparison of Vacuum Suction Sheath and Non-Vacuum Suction Sheath in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. J Invest Surg. 2022 May;35(5):1145-1152. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1995538. Epub 2021 Dec 13. PubMed 34902273 ↗
  • Liu Y, Zhu W, Zeng G. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with suction: is this the future? Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Mar 1;31(2):95-101. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000854. PubMed 33470685 ↗
  • Traxer O, Keller EX. Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2020 Aug;38(8):1883-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02654-5. Epub 2019 Feb 6. PubMed 30729311 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07087977
Responsible party
Bristol Whiles, MD (Assistant Professor of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 28, 2025
Start date
Aug 22, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 6, 2026

Study contacts

Jane Ledesma
Contact
jledesma2@kumc.edu
913-588-8721
Bristol Whiles, MD
principal investigator · University of Kansas Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion