ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07082543Updated Sep 22, 2026

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Nizubaglustat (AZ-3102) in Late-infantile and Juvenile Forms of GM1 Gangliosidosis or GM2 Gangliosidosis

A Phase 3 interventional study of AZ-3102 and Placebo in Gangliosidoses, GM2 and Gangliosidosis, GM1, sponsored by Azafaros B.V.. Active, not recruiting at 27 sites in 14 countries. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-22.

Sponsored by Azafaros B.V. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 17 studies in Gangliosidoses, GM2 with a site in United States — 4 open to participants now, 6 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Gangliosidoses, GM2 · United States.

Started
2025
with 1 other
Phase 3
3 of 17
1 open now
Registered
16th of 17
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 17
Azafaros B.V.

Among the 17 studies in Gangliosidoses, GM2 with a site in United States, this one is one of 2 that started in 2025, is one of 3 in phase 3, and was the 16th registered.

Gangliosidoses, GM2

26 studies on the registry are indexed under Gangliosidoses, GM2; 6 are open to participants now.

Browse Gangliosidoses, GM2 studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 17 studies in Gangliosidoses, GM2 with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 5 Gangliosidoses, GM2 studies recruiting now, 4 set no upper age limit and none stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.

This study: 4 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Gangliosidoses, GM2 with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

An 18-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral nizubaglustat (AZ-3102) in late-infantile and juvenile forms of GM1 gangliosidosis or GM2 gangliosidosis

Read the detailed description

Please see NCT #07054515 for information on the AZA-001-301 Master Protocol

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate superior efficacy on ataxic manifestations with oral nizubaglustat dosing compared with placebo when administered over 18 months in participants with late-infantile and juvenile forms of GM1/GM2 gangliosidosis

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

I. To assess additional efficacy in ataxic and non-ataxic manifestations comparing nizubaglustat dosing with placebo when administered over 18 months in participants with late-infantile and juvenile forms of GM1/GM2 gangliosidosis

II. To assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of nizubaglustat after administration of the first dose (Visit 1) and at steady state after multiple once daily doses

III. To assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of nizubaglustat

IV. To assess the safety and tolerability of daily oral nizubaglustat dosing compared with placebo, when administered over 18 months in participants with late-infantile and juvenile forms of GM1/GM2 gangliosidosis

03

Conditions studied

  • Gangliosidoses, GM2
  • Gangliosidosis, GM1

Keywords

  • Nizubaglustat
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed GM1 gangliosidosis or Tay-Sachs, Sandhoff, or GM2AB variant
  • Male and female participants aged 4 years and older at the time of
  • Onset of neurological symptoms from 1 to 10 years
  • Disability level at Baseline: Ataxic disturbances with a total SARA score of ≥3 and ≤30 at Baseline
  • Females of who are sexually active willing to follow the guidance
  • Male participants with a female partner of childbearing potential willing to follow the contraceptive guidance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of medical conditions other than GM1 or GM2 gangliosidosis that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, would confound scientific rigor or the interpretation of results
  • Body weight of \<10 kg
  • The presence of another neurologic disease
  • The presence of moderate or severe hepatic impairment
  • The presence of moderate or severe renal impairment
  • count of \<100x10\^9/L
  • The dose of any anti-epileptic treatment(s) was not stable (required a change in dose within the previous 3 months) and/or a new anti-epileptic treatment (drug or procedure) was prescribed in the month before Baseline
  • Prior use of an drug within the 3 months before Screening; or prior participation in a clinical study involving gene therapy or stem cell transplantation within 2 years prior to Screening
  • A positive serum pregnancy test (for women of )
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nizubaglustat

    Once daily oral dispersible tablets

    Drug: AZ-3102

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Nizubaglustat

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in total Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) score

    Total SARA comprises eight categories with a cumulative score ranging from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia)

    Time frame: Baseline to month 18

  2. Change from baseline in functional SARA score

    Functional SARA uses an abbreviated scale that scores 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment

    Time frame: Baseline to month 18

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in SARA score for gait/posture

    Assessed on a 9-point scale with higher scores indicating inability to complete the task

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  2. Change from baseline in SARA score for speech

    Assessed on a 7-point scale with higher scores indicating unintelligible speech/anarthria

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  3. Change from baseline in SARA score for kinetics

    Assessed on a 5-point scale with higher scores indicating more severe impairment

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  4. Change from baseline in Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS)

    Assesses four domains of function: communication, daily living skills, socialization, and motor skills

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  5. Change from baseline in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS)

    Assessed on an 8-point ordinal scale, with 1 representing the lowest and 8 the highest/most severe score

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  6. Change from baseline in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT-D)

    Assessed by the number of pegs per second placed in a 50-second, 9-HPT using the dominant hand

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  7. Change from baseline in Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)

    Assesses individual goals achieved during the study

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  8. Change from baseline in Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C)

    Assessed on a 7-point scale with higher scores indicating lower improvement

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  9. Change from baseline in Participant/Caregiver Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

    Assessed on a 7-point scale with higher scores indicating lower improvement

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  10. Change from baseline in Seizure frequency and duration, as per the seizure diary

    Time frame: Baseline to months 6, 12, and 18

  11. Time-to-event comparison between nizubaglustat and placebo over the study duration for pre-defined detrimental events of an increase in total SARA score of ≥2 points

    Time frame: Baseline to month 18

  12. Time-to-event comparison between nizubaglustat and placebo over the course of the study for pre-defined detrimental events of an increase in functional SARA of ≥1.5 points

    Time frame: Baseline to month 18

  13. Time-to-event comparison between nizubaglustat and placebo over the study duration for pre-defined detrimental events of a decrease in PAS of ≥1 point

    Time frame: Baseline to month 18

  14. Time-to-event comparison between nizubaglustat and placebo over the study duration for pre-defined detrimental events of participants leaving the study due to participant/caregiver perception of disease progression/lack of efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline to month 18

  15. Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1,18, and 21

  16. Time to Cmax (Tmax)

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1,18, and 21

  17. Plasma trough concentration (Ctrough)

    Time frame: Baseline and month 1

  18. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing (zero) to 24 hours post-dose (AUC0-24) at baseline

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

  19. Accumulation ratio for Cmax

    Time frame: Baseline and months 1,18, and 21

  20. Change from baseline in plasma concentration of glucosylceramide (GlcCer) C16:0; C18:0

    Time frame: Baseline to months 1, 6, 12, and 18

07

Study locations

27 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2028, 31 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 27, 2025
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
StartActual
Jun 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 6, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 6, 2028
Last update
Sep 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07082543
Lead sponsor
Azafaros B.V.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Start date
Jun 30, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 6, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Nizubaglustat

Start the discussion