CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07075705Updated Sep 11, 2026

Transperineal Micro-ultrasound for the Detection of Prostate Cancer During Biopsy

An interventional study of Biopsy of Prostate and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Carcinoma, sponsored by Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Roswell Park Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This clinical trial studies whether transperineal micro-ultrasound can be used to detect prostate cancer during biopsy. Transrectal ultrasound is often used during prostate biopsy. Transrectal ultrasound imaging is a procedure in which a probe that sends out high-energy sound waves is inserted into the rectum. The sound waves are bounced off internal tissues or organs and make echoes. The echoes form a picture of body tissue called a sonogram. Transrectal ultrasound is used to look for abnormalities in the rectum and nearby structures, including the prostate. The images are used to guide the prostate biopsy. Transperineal micro-ultrasound is completed by placing a probe over the skin between the scrotum and anus (perineum). It is a high-resolution ultrasound at 29 megahertz (MHz) (compared to traditional ultrasound at 6-9 MHz). This higher frequency allows for an improved spatial resolution. This improved spatial resolution is approximately the diameter of a prostatic duct, and therefore, may be able to visualize slight changes in the structure of prostatic ducts that are not possible with standard transrectal ultrasound. Transperineal micro-ultrasound may be more effective in detecting prostate cancer during biopsy.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To investigate the feasibility and validity of using transperineal micro-ultrasound to image the prostate and detect clinically significant prostate cancer.

II. To test the quality of visualization of the prostate gland using micro-ultrasound via the transperineal approach.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To compare micro-ultrasound images done via the transperineal method to micro-ultrasound images done via the transrectal method to see if transperineal ultrasound has similar ability to detect suspicious prostate lesions as transrectal micro-ultrasound.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo transperineal micro-ultrasound imaging over 3 minutes followed by transrectal micro-ultrasound imaging during standard of care prostate biopsy. Patients also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during screening.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Carcinoma

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Men aged ≥ 18 years
  • Men scheduled for transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy who have had a prebiopsy MRI. Therefore patients unable to have a prebiopsy MRI who have contraindications to MRI or unwilling to undergo MRI would be excluded
  • The participant or legal representative must understand the investigational nature of this study and sign an Independent Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board-approved written informed consent form before receiving any study-related procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition which in the investigator's opinion deems the participant an unsuitable candidate for study participation
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
138 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diagnostic (transperineal micro-ultrasound)

    Patients undergo transperineal micro-ultrasound imaging over 3 minutes followed by transrectal micro-ultrasound imaging during standard of care prostate biopsy. Patients also undergo MRI during screening.

    Procedure: Biopsy of Prostate · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging · Procedure: Micro-ultrasound Imaging

Interventions

  • ProcedureBiopsy of Prostate

    Undergo standard of care prostate biopsy

    Also known as: Prostate Biopsy, Prostatic Biopsy

  • ProcedureMagnetic Resonance Imaging

    Undergo MRI

    Also known as: Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, MRIs, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, sMRI, Structural MRI

  • ProcedureMicro-ultrasound Imaging

    Undergo transperineal micro-ultrasound imaging

    Also known as: Micro ultrasound, Micro ultrasound Imaging, Micro-ultrasound, microUS

  • ProcedureMicro-ultrasound Imaging

    Undergo transrectal micro-ultrasound imaging

    Also known as: Micro ultrasound, Micro ultrasound Imaging, Micro-ultrasound, microUS

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with Prostate Risk Identification Using Micro-Ultrasound (PRIMUS) score (Feasibility)

    At the first stage, 28 patients will be enrolled. If the procedure was successful in at least 18 patients, the procedure will be considered feasible, and the study will proceed to the next stage. If less than 18 successes were observed, the study team will determine whether to continue the trial based on the data collected.

    Time frame: Up to 2 months

  2. Visualization of the prostate from base to apex with adequate image quality for PRIMUS scoring

    Will decide yes or no for whether the prostate can be assessed using transperineal micro ultrasound in order to evaluate for possible prostate cancer using the PRIMUS scoring system. This includes being able to visualize the prostate from base to apex with adequate image quality for PRIMUS scoring.

    Time frame: Up to 2 months

  3. Visualization of the prostate from right and left lateral margins with adequate image quality for PRIMUS scoring

    Will decide yes or no for whether the prostate can be assessed using transperineal micro ultrasound in order to evaluate for possible prostate cancer using the PRIMUS scoring system. This includes being able to visualize the prostate from right and left lateral margins with adequate image quality for PRIMUS scoring.

    Time frame: Up to 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Successful generation of PRIMUS score in transperineal and transrectal ultrasound images

    Will compare transrectal and transperineal micro-ultrasound assessment of PRIMUS score. This will be a yes/no comparison. Summary statistics in frequencies and relative frequencies will be provided.

    Time frame: Up to 7 months

  2. Ability to visualize the whole prostate using transperineal micro-ultrasound

    This will be a yes/no comparison. Summary statistics in frequencies and relative frequencies will be provided.

    Time frame: Up to 7 months

  3. Quality of images of transperineal ultrasound and transrectal ultrasound of the prostate

    The quality of images of transperineal ultrasound will be compared to transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Summary statistics in frequencies and relative frequencies will be provided.

    Time frame: Up to 7 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    Buffalo, New York 14263, United States
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07075705
Lead sponsor
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 20, 2025
Start date
Aug 18, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Khurshid A Guru
principal investigator · Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion