ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07072624E-PTSUpdated Oct 29, 2026

Early Post-Traumatic Seizures Prevention Trial (E-PTS Trial)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Phenytoin and Levetiracetam in Seizures, Traumatic Brain Injuries and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur. Recruiting at 3 sites in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Updated Oct 29, 2026Sponsor changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,260
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale/gaps in existing knowledge: The prophylaxis for post-traumatic seizures (PTS) remains controversial due to a lack of class I evidence. Investigators plan to conduct a high-quality, prospective, multicentric, randomized study regarding seizure prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury (TBI) with phenytoin, levetiracetam, and the placebo in three respective treatment groups, along with the effect of drug polymorphism on seizure occurrence.

Novelty: Literature is scarce regarding the ideal management of early PTS in traumatic brain injury (TBI), a major public health problem. Further, no study has evaluated the effect of genetic polymorphism on seizure occurrence in traumatic brain injury. This Multicentric study will be the first of its kind, not only in India but also globally.

Objectives: To evaluate the seizure incidence \& efficacy of the respective anti-epileptic drug in each treatment arm. Assessment of clinical \& functional outcomes, safety profile, and cost-effectiveness in each group. Effect of genetic polymorphisms on seizure incidence among study participants Methods: A Multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded clinical trial is planned. After satisfying eligibility criteria and informed consent, TBI patients will be randomly allocated into three arms 'phenytoin arm', 'levetiracetam arm', and 'placebo'. Drug polymorphism will be analyzed in all the patients using quantitative real-time PCR.

Expected outcome: This study will provide high-quality evidence in PTS management and will establish the role of prophylactic anti-epileptics in PTS. This study also opens the plethora of undesignated roles of genetic polymorphism in the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam and phenytoin in traumatic brain injury patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seizures
  • Traumatic Brain Injuries
  • Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients

Keywords

  • Post Traumatic Seizures
  • Early Post Traumatic Seizures
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Seizure Prophylaxis
  • Antiepileptic drugs
  • Phenytoin
  • Levetiracetam
  • Placebo
  • Genetic polymorphism
  • CYP2C9
  • SV2A
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Multicentric Trial
03

In context

Seizures

766 studies on the registry are indexed under Seizures; 136 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,260 is above the median of 64 across 519 interventional studies indexed under Seizures.

Browse Seizures studies →

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients of severe blunt TBI with GCS score less than 10.
  2. Patients with GCS of more than 10 in the presence of computed tomographic imaging findings consistent with brain injury: subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH], subdural hematoma [SDH], epidural hematoma [EDH], intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], or diffuse axonal injury [DAI], depressed skull fracture.
  3. Patients with penetrating injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Females of childbearing age with urine pregnancy test positive.
  2. Devastating brain injury with expected or confirmed brain death within 48 hours of hospital admission,
  3. Prehospital use of anticonvulsants
  4. Development of seizures before enrolment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
1,260 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Phenytoin

    Drug: Phenytoin

  • Experimental
    Levetiracetam

    Drug: Levetiracetam

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • The Phenytoin group will be given a loading dose of phenytoin 20 mg/kg intravenously (maximum, 2 gm) at 50 mg per minute and then started on a maintenance dose (5-6 mg/kg/d, rounded to the nearest 100 mg, intravenously administered every 8 hours). The intravenous will be switched to oral once the patient is fit to take it orally or via Ryles tube. The oral dose would be a single 300 mg ER (extended-release) tablet per day. Both IV and/or oral doses of phenytoin will be given only for 1 week after head trauma. Patient= Patients with Traumatic brain injury as per eligibility criteria. Intervention= Phenytoin loading dose IV (20 mg/kg) followed by 100 mg IV TDS till patient accepts orally. Oral dose will be administered as a single 300 mg ER tablet per day. Both IV and oral phenytoin will be given for 1 week after traumatic brain injury and then stopped. Comparator= Matching Placebo

  • The Levetiracetam group will receive 25-30 mg/kg/d in two divided doses (rounded to 750 mg, administered intravenously every 12 hourly). The intravenous dose will be switched to oral form once the patient is fit to take it orally or via Ryles tube. The oral dose would be two tablets of 750 mg ER (extended-release) levetiracetam daily. Both IV and/or oral doses of levetiracetam will be given only for 1 week after head trauma. Patient= Patients with Traumatic brain injury as per eligibility criteria. Intervention= Levetiracetam IV dosing will be 25-30 mg/Kg/d in 2 divided doses (rounded to 750 mg IV BD) followed by 2 tablets of 750 mg ER once patient fit to take orally or via Ryles tube. Comparator= Matching Placebo.

  • DrugPlacebo

    The Placebo group will be administered normal saline intravenously of similar amount that of intervention group and matching placebo tablets orally (double dummy) once the patient is fit to take orally. Similar to the intervention group, both IV and oral placebo will be given till 1 week after traumatic brain injury.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Clinical Seizure Within 7 Days Post-Traumatic Brain Injury in each of the three treatment groups.

    A total of 1260 participants experiencing early clinical seizures (defined as any observable seizure activity occurring within 7 days post-trauma), as recorded by treating clinicians, and confirmed through clinical documentation, during the first 7 days of the study intervention period in each group (Phenytoin, Levetiracetam, Placebo).

    Time frame: 7 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Glasgow Coma Scale scores from baseline at 7 days post-trauma, at 6 months, and 1 year in each treatment group.

    Title: Functional and Neurological Status Assessed Using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Description: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)-a clinical tool used to assess the level of consciousness in traumatic brain injury patients. Scores range from 3 to 15, where higher scores indicate better neurological function. The GCS differentiates between the severities of head injury by score ranges. A GCS of 13-15 indicates a mild head injury, 9-12 moderate and 3-8 severe. Time Frame: GCS: Day 1(Baseline), Day 3, Day 5, and Day 7, at discharge , at 6-month \& 1 year follow up. Assessment Method: GCS: Assessed by trained clinical staff daily using standard scoring protocol.

    Time frame: 7 Days , 6 Months & 1 year

  2. Glasgow Outcome Scale scores at hospital discharge, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up in each treatment group.

    Title: Functional and Neurological Status Assessed Using Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Description: Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) - a global outcome measure of functional recovery post-TBI. Scores range from 1 (death) to 5 (good recovery), where higher scores indicate better outcomes. Time Frame: GOS: At hospital discharge and 6-month follow-up. Assessment method GOS: Assessed at discharge by clinical staff, and at 6 months and at 1 year via telephonic or in-person follow-up

    Time frame: At discharge, 6 months and 1 year

  3. Incidence of early clinical seizures in participants, assessed in association with CYP2C9 and SV2A gene polymorphisms, using TaqMan allelic discrimination assay with quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR).

    Title: Association Between CYP2C9 and SV2A Genetic Polymorphisms and Early Seizure Incidence. Description: Genotyping of CYP2C9 and SV2A polymorphisms will be performed using TaqMan allelic discrimination assay with quantitative real-time PCR. The incidence of early clinical seizures (defined as seizures occurring within 7 days post-trauma) will be compared across different genotype groups. The outcome will be reported as the number and proportion of participants with early seizures by genotype. Time Frame: Within 7 days post-injury Unit of Measure: Number of participants with seizures per genotype group.

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of Levetiracetam vs Phenytoin in Preventing Early Post-Traumatic Seizures using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation.

    Description: Cost-effectiveness within the trial will be assessed by calculating the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), defined as the difference in direct medical costs per seizure complication prevented between the phenytoin and levetiracetam groups. Cost data include direct medical cost like drug acquisition, hospital stay, ICU stay, investigations, and seizure-related interventions. Outcome data will include the number of patients with early clinical seizures (within 7 days). Economic evaluation will be performed over a 1-year follow-up period using trial-based data. ICER values will be calculated along with 95% confidence intervals, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted using probabilistic approach. Long-term cost effectiveness will be modelled using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation. Time Frame: From randomization to 1-year post-injury follow-up. Measure Type: Cost-effectiveness ratio Unit of Measure: INR (₹) per seizure prevented

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

3 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research
    Chandigarh, Punjab 160012, India
    Recruiting
    • Dr Apinderpreet Singh Additional Professor, MCh Neurosurgery · Contactapinderpreetsingh@gmail.com · +91 9914207338
    • Bikash Medhi, MD · Contactdrbikashus@yahoo.com · +91 9815409652
    • Dr Apinderpreet Singh Additional Professor, MCh Neurosugery · Principal investigator
  • AIIMS Jodhpur
    Jodhpur, Rajasthan 342005, India
    Recruiting
  • Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
    Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
    Recruiting
    • Dr Kamlesh bhaisora Additional Professor, MCh Neurosurgery · Contactdrkamleshbhaisora@gmail.com · +91 8004904457
    • Raghavendra Lingaiah, MD · Contactraghulingaiah@gmail.com · +91 9968868075
    • Dr Kamlesh Bhaisora Additional Professor, MCh Neurosugery · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gupta V, Gupta K, Singh G, Kaushal S. An Analytical Study to Correlate Serum Levels of Levetiracetam with Clinical Course in Patients with Epilepsy. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016 Dec;7(Suppl 1):S31-S36. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.196445. PubMed 28163500 ↗
  • Kousar S, Wafai ZA, Wani MA, Jan TR, Andrabi KI. Clinical relevance of genetic polymorphism in CYP2C9 gene to pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in epileptic patients: validatory pharmacogenomic approach to pharmacovigilance. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul;53(7):504-16. doi: 10.5414/CP202112. PubMed 25943175 ↗
  • Chang WC, Hung SI, Carleton BC, Chung WH. An update on CYP2C9 polymorphisms and phenytoin metabolism: implications for adverse effects. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2020 Aug;16(8):723-734. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2020.1780209. Epub 2020 Jul 16. PubMed 32510242 ↗
  • Dibbens LM, Hodgson BL, Helbig KL, Oliver KL, Mulley JC, Berkovic SF, Scheffer IE. Rare protein sequence variation in SV2A gene does not affect response to levetiracetam. Epilepsy Res. 2012 Sep;101(3):277-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Apr 30. PubMed 22551666 ↗
  • Schivell AE, Mochida S, Kensel-Hammes P, Custer KL, Bajjalieh SM. SV2A and SV2C contain a unique synaptotagmin-binding site. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005 May;29(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.12.011. PubMed 15866046 ↗
  • Jones KE, Puccio AM, Harshman KJ, Falcione B, Benedict N, Jankowitz BT, Stippler M, Fischer M, Sauber-Schatz EK, Fabio A, Darby JM, Okonkwo DO. Levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis in severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2008 Oct;25(4):E3. doi: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.10.E3. PubMed 18828701 ↗
  • Szaflarski JP, Sangha KS, Lindsell CJ, Shutter LA. Prospective, randomized, single-blinded comparative trial of intravenous levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. Neurocrit Care. 2010 Apr;12(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9304-y. PubMed 19898966 ↗
  • Jarvie D, Mahmoud SH. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Select Populations. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2018;21(1s):149s-176s. doi: 10.18433/jpps30081. PubMed 30096051 ↗
  • Cardona AF, Rojas L, Wills B, Bernal L, Ruiz-Patino A, Arrieta O, Hakim EJ, Hakim F, Mejia JA, Useche N, Bermudez S, Carranza H, Vargas C, Otero J, Mayor LC, Ortiz LD, Franco S, Ortiz C, Gil-Gil M, Balana C, Zatarain-Barron ZL. Efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam vs. other antiepileptic drugs in Hispanic patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2018 Jan;136(2):363-371. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2660-0. Epub 2017 Nov 25. PubMed 29177594 ↗
  • Dikmen SS, Temkin NR, Miller B, Machamer J, Winn HR. Neurobehavioral effects of phenytoin prophylaxis of posttraumatic seizures. JAMA. 1991 Mar 13;265(10):1271-7. PubMed 1995974 ↗
  • Bhullar IS, Johnson D, Paul JP, Kerwin AJ, Tepas JJ 3rd, Frykberg ER. More harm than good: antiseizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury does not decrease seizure rates but may inhibit functional recovery. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):54-60; discussion 60-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182aafd15. PubMed 24368357 ↗
  • Young B, Rapp RP, Norton JA, Haack D, Tibbs PA, Bean JR. Failure of prophylactically administered phenytoin to prevent late posttraumatic seizures. J Neurosurg. 1983 Feb;58(2):236-41. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.58.2.0236. PubMed 6848681 ↗
  • Ferguson PL, Smith GM, Wannamaker BB, Thurman DJ, Pickelsimer EE, Selassie AW. A population-based study of risk of epilepsy after hospitalization for traumatic brain injury. Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):891-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02384.x. Epub 2009 Oct 20. PubMed 19845734 ↗
  • Annegers JF, Hauser WA, Coan SP, Rocca WA. A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 1;338(1):20-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801013380104. PubMed 9414327 ↗
  • Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Wilensky AJ, Keihm J, Chabal S, Winn HR. A randomized, double-blind study of phenytoin for the prevention of post-traumatic seizures. N Engl J Med. 1990 Aug 23;323(8):497-502. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199008233230801. PubMed 2115976 ↗
  • Torbic H, Forni AA, Anger KE, Degrado JR, Greenwood BC. Use of antiepileptics for seizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 May 1;70(9):759-66. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120203. PubMed 23592358 ↗
  • Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432. PubMed 27654000 ↗
  • Inaba K, Menaker J, Branco BC, Gooch J, Okoye OT, Herrold J, Scalea TM, Dubose J, Demetriades D. A prospective multicenter comparison of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for early posttraumatic seizure prophylaxis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Mar;74(3):766-71; discussion 771-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182826e84. PubMed 23425733 ↗
  • Agrawal A, Munivenkatappa A, Shukla DP, Menon GR, Alogolu R, Galwankar S, Kumar SS, Momhan PR, Pal R, Rustagi N. Traumatic brain injury related research in India: An overview of published literature. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016 Apr-Jun;6(2):65-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.183025. PubMed 27308253 ↗
  • Gururaj G. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries: Indian scenario. Neurol Res. 2002 Jan;24(1):24-8. doi: 10.1179/016164102101199503. PubMed 11783750 ↗
  • Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, Agrawal A, Adeleye AO, Shrime MG, Rubiano AM, Rosenfeld JV, Park KB. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr 27;130(4):1080-1097. doi: 10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352. Print 2019 Apr 1. PubMed 29701556 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 19 months after the start.

Of 26 phase 4 interventional studies under Seizures, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 20 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 19 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 30, 2025
First posted
Jul 18, 2025
StartActual
Jul 23, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 15, 2028
Last update
Oct 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sponsor
Collaborators added: Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences; collaborators removed: Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences,Lucknow
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    Sponsor Collaborators added: Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences; collaborators removed: Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences,Lucknow
    + 2 other changes: verification date and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07072624
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur
Collaborators
Indian Council of Medical Research, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Jaskaran Singh Gosal (Associate Professor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 18, 2025
Start date
Jul 23, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Jaskaran Singh Gosal Associate Professor, MCh Neurosurgery
Contact
jhsgosal_87@hotmail.com
91 6283475891
Dr Shoban Babu Varthya Associate Professor, MD Pharmacology
Contact
drshobanpgimer@gmail.com
91 8437726777
Dr Apinderpreet Singh Additional Professor, MCh Neurosugery
principal investigator · Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
Dr Kamlesh Bhaisora Additional Professor, MCh Neurosugery
principal investigator · Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Levetiracetam

Start the discussion