CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07062744Updated Jul 14, 2025

The Role of Swan-Ganz Catheter in Hemodynamic Resuscitation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock

An interventional study of Swan-Ganz IQ Pulmonary Arterial catheter and Swan-Ganz IQ catheter in Cardiogenic Shock, Pulmonary Artery Catheter Waveform Interpretation and Hemodynamic Management, sponsored by Bach Mai Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Vietnam. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-14.

Sponsored by Bach Mai Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical trial examines whether the use of the Swan-Ganz catheter, a specialized pulmonary artery catheter, can improve hemodynamic management and treatment outcomes in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Cardiogenic shock is a critical condition marked by the heart's inability to supply adequate blood to the organs, often resulting from a severe heart attack. Despite advancements in care, the condition remains associated with high mortality. Effective monitoring of cardiovascular status is crucial in guiding timely and tailored treatment decisions.

Participants in this study will undergo advanced hemodynamic monitoring using the Swan-Ganz catheter, which provides continuous data on cardiac output and other key parameters. This information enables physicians to better assess circulatory function and adjust therapies accordingly.

The research will evaluate clinical characteristics, response to treatment, and 30-day outcomes in patients managed with this technique. The study also aims to identify factors associated with successful hemodynamic stabilization and potential complications related to catheter use.

A total of 108 adult patients meeting specific eligibility criteria will be enrolled at Bach Mai Hospital over 3 years. Participation is voluntary, and all patients will continue to receive standard-of-care treatment. All personal and medical data will be handled with strict confidentiality.

Read the detailed description

This is a clinical trial without a control group; a single-center study evaluates goal-directed hemodynamic optimization using pulmonary artery catheterization (Swan-Ganz catheter) in adult patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Cardiogenic shock is characterized by a sustained systolic blood pressure \< 90 mmHg, evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion, and a low cardiac index (\< 2.2 L/min/m²) despite adequate filling pressures. In AMI patients, persistent low cardiac output and elevated systemic vascular resistance exacerbate tissue hypoxia, leading to multi-organ dysfunction.

Upon ICU admission, a pulmonary artery catheter will be inserted via the internal jugular or subclavian vein. Continuous measurements of right atrial pressure (RAP), right ventricular pressure, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac output (via thermodilution), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂) will be recorded at baseline and predefined intervals (0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 hours). Data will guide titration of inotropes (e.g., dobutamine targeting cardiac index ≥ 2.2 L/min/m²), vasopressors (e.g., norepinephrine to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg), and fluid management (to achieve PCWP from 12 to 18 mmHg and CVP between 8 to 12 mmHg), SvO₂ keep above 60% to 80%, lactat \< 2 mmol/L.

The primary endpoint is 30-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary endpoints include duration of vasopressor/inotrope support, ICU length of stay, incidence of acute kidney injury, and catheter-related adverse events. Hemodynamic variables will be analyzed for outcomes using multivariate regression to identify predictors of successful hemodynamic stabilization.

All enrolled patients (n ≈ 108) will receive standard AMI care, including early revascularization and guideline-directed medical therapy in conjunction with the study protocol. Data collection, storage, and analysis will comply with Good Clinical Practice and the institution's ethics board requirements. Participation is voluntary, and patients may withdraw at any time without affecting their clinical management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiogenic Shock
  • Pulmonary Artery Catheter Waveform Interpretation
  • Hemodynamic Management
  • Hemodynamic Optimization
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
  • Critical Care, Intensive Care
  • Emergency
  • Cardio Vascular Disease

Keywords

  • Swan-Ganz
  • Pulmonary Artery Catheter
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Hemodynamic management
  • Invasive hemodynamic
  • Right Heart Catheter
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Provided written informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Diagnosed with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction according to IABP-SHOCK II (2012) criteria:

    • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mmHg for at least 30 minutes, or requiring vasopressor agents to maintain SBP > 90 mmHg.
    • Evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion, indicated by at least one of the following: Altered mental status, Urine output \< 30 mL/hour, Cold extremities with mottled skin, Serum lactate level > 2 mmol/L.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of cervical cellulitis.
  • Inability to identify neck anatomy or history of cervical radiotherapy.
  • Coagulopathy (INR > 1.5 and/or platelet count \< 50 G/L).
  • End-stage chronic diseases, including: Advanced malignancy, advanced-stage HIV, bedridden patients for more than 3 months, decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class C).
  • Patients with cardiac arrest or mechanical complications such as myocardial rupture prior to Swan-Ganz catheterization.
  • Congenital heart defects or intracardiac shunts. Refusal of participation by the patient or their legal representative.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
108 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Swan-Ganz-Guided Hemodynamic Resuscitation

    Participants in this arm will undergo invasive hemodynamic monitoring using a Swan-Ganz catheter upon admission to the intensive care unit. Hemodynamic variables, including right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac output (CO), cardiac power output (CPO), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂) will be continuously measured and used to guide resuscitation. Management will follow a goal-directed algorithm targeting predefined thresholds for preload, afterload, contractility, and oxygen delivery. All patients will receive standard care for acute myocardial infarction, and no control or comparator arm is included in this study.

    Device: Swan-Ganz IQ Pulmonary Arterial catheter · Device: Swan-Ganz IQ catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceSwan-Ganz IQ Pulmonary Arterial catheter

    A pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz catheter) will be inserted via the right internal jugular or subclavian vein using a sterile technique and ultrasound guidance. The catheter is advanced into the pulmonary artery with real-time pressure waveform monitoring to confirm accurate positioning. Once inserted, the catheter provides continuous invasive hemodynamic monitoring, including measurements of: Right atrial pressure (RAP), Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), Cardiac output (CO) by thermodilution, Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂). These parameters are recorded at predefined intervals and used to guide goal-directed hemodynamic resuscitation. Clinical interventions such as vasopressor/inotrope titration, fluid resuscitation, or ventilatory support will be adjusted accordingly. All procedures will follow institutional protocols and safety standards. Complications (e.g., arrhythmias, infection) will be monitored and managed per protocol.

    Also known as: Flow-Directed Cathete, Plumonary Artery Catheter Swan-Ganz, Swan-Ganz catheterization, PAC, Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

  • DeviceSwan-Ganz IQ catheter

    A pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz catheter) will be inserted via the right internal jugular or subclavian vein using a sterile technique and ultrasound guidance. The catheter is advanced into the pulmonary artery with real-time pressure waveform monitoring to confirm accurate positioning. Once inserted, the catheter provides continuous invasive hemodynamic monitoring, including measurements of: Right atrial pressure (RAP), Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), Cardiac output (CO) by thermodilution, Mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂). These parameters are recorded at predefined intervals and used to guide goal-directed hemodynamic resuscitation. Clinical interventions such as vasopressor/inotrope titration, fluid resuscitation, or ventilatory support will be adjusted accordingly. All procedures will follow institutional protocols and safety standards. Complications (e.g., arrhythmias, infection) will be monitored and managed per protocol.

    Also known as: Cardiovascular Diagnostic Catheters, Pulmonary Artery Catheter, Swan-Ganz catheterization, Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-Cause Mortality at 30 Days

    The proportion of participants who die from any cause within 30 days of Swan-Ganz catheter insertion. Mortality will be determined by review of hospital medical records, ICU documentation, or death certificates.

    Time frame: From the date of Swan-Ganz catheter insertion until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 30 days

  2. In-Hospital Mortality

    Proportion of enrolled patients who die from any cause during the index hospitalization after Swan-Ganz catheter insertion. Mortality will be determined by review of hospital medical records, ICU documentation.

    Time frame: From the date of Swan-Ganz catheter insertion until the hospital discharge date or the in-hospital death date, whichever comes first.

  3. Hemodynamic stabilization was achieved within 24 hours

    Proportion of patients achieving predefined hemodynamic targets within 24 hours following Swan-Ganz catheter insertion. Targets include mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥ 65 mmHg, cardiac index (CI) ≥ 2.2 L/min/m², central venous oxygen saturation (SvO₂) ≥ 60%, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) between 12 and 18 mmHg, and central venous pressure (CVP) between 8 and 12 mmHg.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours after Swan-Ganz catheter insertion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of ICU stay

    Total number of days from emergency department ICU admission to emergency department ICU discharge for each participant.

    Time frame: From the date of ICU admission until the date of ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days.

  2. Incidence of Catheter-Related Complications

    The incidence of specific complications related to Swan-Ganz catheterization will be assessed, including ventricular arrhythmias, catheter malposition, CLABSI, bleeding at the insertion site, pneumothorax, hematoma, pericardial effusion, pulmonary artery catheter obstruction, thrombosis, and local site complications. Each complication will be reported individually as a percentage of the total study population.

    Time frame: From the date of Swan-Ganz catheter insertion until the date of catheter removal, assessed up to 30 days.

  3. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation (Ventilator Days)

    Number of calendar days that the patient remains on invasive mechanical ventilation from the time of endotracheal intubation until successful extubation or death. Reintubation within 48 hours will be considered part of the same ventilation episode.

    Time frame: From the date of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation until the date of weaning mechanical ventilation success or death, assessed up to 30 days.

  4. Continuous Requirement for Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT)

    Proportion of participants who require any form of renal replacement therapy (intermittent hemodialysis, continuous renal replacement therapy, or sustained low-efficiency dialysis) during the index hospitalization for cardiogenic shock.

    Time frame: From the date of emergency department admission until the date of hospital discharge or death, assessed up to 30 days.

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • BachMai Hospital, Hanoi Medical University
    Hanoi, 100000, Vietnam
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Tehrani BN, Truesdell AG, Psotka MA, Rosner C, Singh R, Sinha SS, Damluji AA, Batchelor WB. A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):879-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.09.005. PubMed 33121700 ↗
  • Bertaina M, Galluzzo A, Rossello X, Sbarra P, Petitti E, Prever SB, Boccuzzi G, D'Ascenzo F, Frea S, Pidello S, Morici N, Sacco A, Oliva F, Valente S, De Ferrari GM, Ugo F, Rametta F, Attisani M, Zanini P, Noussan P, Iannaccone M. Prognostic implications of pulmonary artery catheter monitoring in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Crit Care. 2022 Jun;69:154024. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154024. Epub 2022 Mar 25. PubMed 35344825 ↗
  • Tehrani BN, Truesdell AG, Sherwood MW, Desai S, Tran HA, Epps KC, Singh R, Psotka M, Shah P, Cooper LB, Rosner C, Raja A, Barnett SD, Saulino P, deFilippi CR, Gurbel PA, Murphy CE, O'Connor CM. Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 9;73(13):1659-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084. PubMed 30947919 ↗
  • Chetana Shanmukhappa S, Lokeshwaran S. Venous Oxygen Saturation. 2024 Sep 10. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK564395/ PubMed 33232065 ↗
  • Kadosh BS, Berg DD, Bohula EA, Park JG, Baird-Zars VM, Alviar C, Alzate J, Barnett CF, Barsness GW, Burke J, Chaudhry SP, Daniels LB, DeFilippis A, Delicce A, Fordyce CB, Ghafghazi S, Gidwani U, Goldfarb M, Katz JN, Keeley EC, Kenigsberg B, Kontos MC, Lawler PR, Leibner E, Menon V, Metkus TS, Miller PE, O'Brien CG, Papolos AI, Prasad R, Shah KS, Sinha SS, Snell RJ, So D, Solomon MA, Ternus BW, Teuteberg JJ, Toole J, van Diepen S, Morrow DA, Roswell RO. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;11(8 Pt 1):903-914. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Jun 14. PubMed 37318422 ↗
  • Hunziker L, Radovanovic D, Jeger R, Pedrazzini G, Cuculi F, Urban P, Erne P, Rickli H, Pilgrim T; AMIS Plus Registry Investigators are listed in alphabetic order with the names of the local principal investigators. Twenty-Year Trends in the Incidence and Outcome of Cardiogenic Shock in AMIS Plus Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007293. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007293. PubMed 30943781 ↗
  • Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Sule S, Jain D, Gotsis W, Ahmed A, Frishman WH, Fonarow GC. Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Jan 13;3(1):e000590. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000590. PubMed 24419737 ↗
  • Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J. Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation. 2009 Mar 10;119(9):1211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947. Epub 2009 Feb 23. PubMed 19237658 ↗
  • Chow JY, Vadakken ME, Whitlock RP, Koziarz A, Ainsworth C, Amin F, McIntyre WF, Demers C, Belley-Cote EP. Pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;68(11):1611-1629. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02083-2. Epub 2021 Aug 17. PubMed 34405356 ↗
  • Rea ABBAC, Mihajlovic V, Vishram-Nielsen JKK, Brahmbhatt DH, Scolari FL, Wang VN, Nisar M, Fung NL, Otsuki M, Billia F, Overgaard CB, Luk A. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Usage and Impact on Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: Results From a Canadian Single-Centre Registry. Can J Cardiol. 2024 Apr;40(4):664-673. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.12.005. Epub 2023 Dec 12. PubMed 38092192 ↗
  • Bertaina M, Galluzzo A, Morici N, Sacco A, Oliva F, Valente S, D'Ascenzo F, Frea S, Sbarra P, Petitti E, Prever SB, Boccuzzi G, Zanini P, Attisani M, Rametta F, De Ferrari GM, Noussan P, Iannaccone M. Pulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Time for a Reappraisal? Card Fail Rev. 2022 Apr 26;8:e15. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.32. eCollection 2022 Jan. PubMed 35541286 ↗
  • Thiele H, Zeymer U, Thelemann N, Neumann FJ, Hausleiter J, Abdel-Wahab M, Meyer-Saraei R, Fuernau G, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Bohm M, Werdan K, Felix SB, Hennersdorf M, Schneider S, Ouarrak T, Desch S, de Waha-Thiele S; IABP-SHOCK II Trial (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II) Investigators; IABP-SHOCK II Investigators. Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial. Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):395-403. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201. Epub 2018 Nov 11. PubMed 30586721 ↗
  • van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, Kilic A, Menon V, Ohman EM, Sweitzer NK, Thiele H, Washam JB, Cohen MG; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; and Mission: Lifeline. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-e268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. Epub 2017 Sep 18. PubMed 28923988 ↗
  • Garan AR, Kanwar M, Thayer KL, Whitehead E, Zweck E, Hernandez-Montfort J, Mahr C, Haywood JL, Harwani NM, Wencker D, Sinha SS, Vorovich E, Abraham J, O'Neill W, Burkhoff D, Kapur NK. Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012. PubMed 33121702 ↗
  • Yoo TK, Miyashita S, Davoudi F, Imahira U, Al-Obaidi A, Chweich H, Huggins GS, Kimmelstiel C, Kapur NK. Clinical impact of pulmonary artery catheter in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Oct;55:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 17. PubMed 37100652 ↗
  • Sinha SS, Rosner CM, Tehrani BN, Maini A, Truesdell AG, Lee SB, Bagchi P, Cameron J, Damluji AA, Desai M, Desai SS, Epps KC, deFilippi C, Flanagan MC, Genovese L, Moukhachen H, Park JJ, Psotka MA, Raja A, Shah P, Sherwood MW, Singh R, Tang D, Young KD, Welch T, O'Connor CM, Batchelor WB. Cardiogenic Shock From Heart Failure Versus Acute Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Characteristics, Hospital Course, and 1-Year Outcomes. Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Jun;15(6):e009279. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.009279. Epub 2022 May 5. PubMed 35510546 ↗
  • Lim HS. Cardiac Power Output Revisited. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;13(10):e007393. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007393. Epub 2020 Sep 30. No abstract available. PubMed 32993372 ↗
  • Fincke R, Hochman JS, Lowe AM, Menon V, Slater JN, Webb JG, LeJemtel TH, Cotter G; SHOCK Investigators. Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21;44(2):340-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.060. PubMed 15261929 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 21, 2025
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 21, 2025
  • Informed consent form · May 21, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07062744
Lead sponsor
Bach Mai Hospital
Collaborators
Hanoi Medical University
Responsible party
Thang Pham (Primary investigation, Bach Mai Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2025
Start date
May 27, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 14, 2025

Study contacts

Thang Xuan Pham, MD, PhD Candidate
Contact
pxthanghmu92@gmail.com
+84357991992
Tuan Anh Nguyen, Prof.PhD
Contact
bstuanccbm@gmail.com
+8431115115
Thang Xuan Pham, MD, PhD Candidate
principal investigator · Hanoi Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion