ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07057817ACHILLSUpdated Jul 22, 2026

The ACHILLS Trial; Application of Cerament in Heel Infection for Lower Limb Salvage

An interventional study of Cerament G and Standard Surgical Managment in Osteomyelitis, Diabetes and Calcanectomy, sponsored by Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland. Recruiting at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ACHILLS Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled feasibility study comparing partial calcanectomy with and without the use of an antibiotic-impregnated bone graft substitute (Cerament G) for treating calcaneal osteomyelitis, specifically on wound healing rates, re-infection, and overall efficacy in a sample of 30 patients over a one-year period.

Read the detailed description

Calcaneal osteomyelitis is a severe infection of the heel bone, frequently linked to peripheral arterial disease and diabetes, which complicates the healing process. This condition can lead to chronic wounds, persistent pain, and, in extreme cases, the need for limb amputation. Standard treatment often involves partial or total calcanectomy, where the infected bone is surgically removed, significantly impacting patients' mobility and quality of life.

The ACHILLS Trial is a multicentre, randomised controlled feasibility study designed to assess the efficacy of partial calcanectomy with and without the use of Cerament G, an antibiotic-impregnated bone graft substitute.

The primary objective is to determine the rate of wound healing in patients undergoing partial calcanectomy for osteomyelitis who receive Cerament G.

Secondary objectives include assessing time to wound healing, rates of re-infection, hospital stay duration, need for extended antibiotic therapy, financial impact, and overall quality of life.

The trial will involve 30 participants, aged 18 and older, undergoing partial calcanectomy for osteomyelitis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving partial calcanectomy with Cerament G, and the other receiving partial calcanectomy alone with standard antibiotic therapy. The study will monitor patients for one year, with data collected at multiple intervals to monitor wound healing, re-infection rates, and other outcomes.

Cerament G, comprising calcium sulphate and hydroxyapatite, serves as a bone substitute and delivers a localised antibiotic (gentamycin) directly to the infection site. This approach aims to reduce infection rates, promote bone healing, and minimise the need for further surgical interventions.

The results from this feasibility study may result in a larger trial, potentially leading to improved management strategies for calcaneal osteomyelitis, reduced healthcare costs, and enhanced patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteomyelitis
  • Diabetes
  • Calcanectomy

Keywords

  • Calcanectomy
  • Eq5d5l
03

In context

Osteomyelitis

105 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteomyelitis; 30 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 74 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Osteomyelitis.

Browse Osteomyelitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 and over
  • Undergoing partial calcanectomy
  • Patients with Type1 or Type 2 Diabetes
  • Patients will be stratified by Pulse status and

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unfit for surgery
  • Patients unable to provide
  • Patients with overwhelming sepsis that require major amputation
  • Patients with to aminoglycosides
  • Pre-existing calcium metabolism disorder
  • Severe renal impairment
  • Patients in whom major limb amputation is deemed inevitable by the treating physician
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Partial Calcanectomy with Cerament G

    Patients will undergo partial calcanectomy with the application of Cerament G.

    Device: Cerament G

  • Active comparator
    Standard Partial Calcanectomy

    Patients will undergo partial calcanectomy with standard antibiotic therapy.

    Other: Standard Surgical Managment

Interventions

  • DeviceCerament G

    Partial Calcanectomy plus cerament G

  • OtherStandard Surgical Managment

    Partial Calcanectomy as standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Wound Healing

    To determine the number of patients achieving complete wound healing in patients undergoing treatment with cerament G compared to those with partial calcanectomy alone by measuring wound volume

    Time frame: 1 months post-surgery

  2. Rate of Wound Healing

    To determine the number of patients achieving complete wound healing in patients undergoing treatment with cerament G compared to those with partial calcanectomy alone by measuring wound volume

    Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

  3. Rate of Wound Healing

    To determine the number of patients achieving complete wound healing in patients undergoing treatment with cerament G compared to those with partial calcanectomy alone by measuring wound volume

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  4. Rate of Wound Healing

    To determine the number of patients achieving complete wound healing in patients undergoing treatment with cerament G compared to those with partial calcanectomy alone by measuring wound volume

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Wound Healing

    Number of days taken to achieve full wound healing.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery

  2. Quality of life measured with the EQ5D5L (Health Questionnaire)

    Impact on patients quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire. The questionnaire covers five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4) and extreme problems (5). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The raw scores are also converted to an EQ-5D index value using a scoring algorithm (British tariff) ranging from -0.594 (worst perceived health state) to 1.00 (best perceived health state)

    Time frame: 1 month post-surgery

  3. Quality of life measured with the EQ5D5L (Health Questionnaire)

    Impact on patients quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire, The questionnaire covers five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4) and extreme problems (5). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The raw scores are also converted to an EQ-5D index value using a scoring algorithm (British tariff) ranging from -0.594 (worst perceived health state) to 1.00 (best perceived health state)

    Time frame: 3 months post-surgery

  4. Quality of life measured with the EQ5D5L (Health Questionnaire)

    Impact on patients quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire, The questionnaire covers five dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems (1), slight problems (2), moderate problems (3), severe problems (4) and extreme problems (5). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The raw scores are also converted to an EQ-5D index value using a scoring algorithm (British tariff) ranging from -0.594 (worst perceived health state) to 1.00 (best perceived health state)

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  5. Quality of life measured with the EQ5D5L (Health Questionnaire)

    Impact on patients quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

  6. Cost to Patients Questionaire (CoPaQ)

    Measures patients' and caregivers' out-of-pocket expenses (e.g., travel) and indirect costs (e.g., loss of income). It is divided into two sections 1. Costs for Patients Questionnaire and 2. Sociodemographic and Health Questions..

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

  7. Length of Hospital Stay

    Length of hospital stay (days)

    Time frame: 12 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07057817
Lead sponsor
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

James Walsh
Contact
james@walshortho.ie
+353 1 809 3344
James Walsh
principal investigator · Beaumont Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion