ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07054060EVA3S-2Updated Jul 24, 2025

Endarterectomy Versus Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis - 2

An interventional study of carotid endarterectomy and Carotid artery stenting in Stroke, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier St Anne. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-24.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier St Anne · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Carotid stenosis caused by atherosclerosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, accounting for up to 15% of all strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in reducing stroke risk in patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been developed as an alternative to CEA, offering several potential advantages, such as avoiding local surgical complications. However, unlike CEA, CAS has not been compared to medical therapy in RCTs for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Read the detailed description

CEA vs CAS Comparison:

Early RCTs conducted in the 2000s showed that CAS was associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death compared to CEA (8.9% vs 5.8%; RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.20-1.96, p=0.0006). However, CAS was found to be as effective as CEA in preventing recurrent ipsilateral strokes up to 10 years after treatment. Interestingly, an ancillary study of the ICSS trial showed that significantly more patients in the CAS group (50%) than in the CEA group (17%) had new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), suggesting that DWI might serve as a surrogate outcome measure for future carotid intervention trials.

Data Analysis and Recent Advances:

Individual pooled data analysis of RCTs indicated that CAS could be as safe and effective as CEA in patients under 70 years old. Recent advances in CAS technology, stenting techniques, antiplatelet therapy, and pre-treatment imaging have improved the periprocedural safety of CAS. Due to its ability to treat patients soon after a stroke, CAS has become increasingly used in routine clinical practice.

Study Objectives:

The question remains whether CAS is as safe as CEA in patients with recent symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. The study's objectives are:

Primary Objective:

To assess whether carotid stenting is non-inferior to carotid endarterectomy in preventing new ischemic lesions on DWI MRI, confirmed by a core lab.

  • To assess the difference between groups regarding post-intervention MRI characteristics in terms of ischemic lesion number and size, vessel occlusion and hemorrhagic transformation
  • To assess differences between groups with regard to the procedural risks and efficacy (within 30 days after procedure) of

    1. any stroke or death
    2. any stroke,
    3. disabling or fatal stroke
    4. death
    5. transient ischemic attack
    6. myocardial infarction
    7. local complication
    8. cranial nerve palsy
02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CEA, CAS
  • stroke
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Carotid Artery Stenting
  • Carotid Endarterectomy
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier St Anne is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient age 18 years or over
  • Hemispheric or retinal or a non-disabling stroke (or retinal infarct) within 15 days before enrolment
  • Stenosis of 50% to 99% in the symptomatic carotid artery (NASCET method) for whom revascularisation is decided according to guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unwilling or unable to participate in follow-up for whatever reason
  • Preexisting disability (Modified Rankin Score ≥ 3)
  • Nonatherosclerotic carotid disease
  • Severe tandem lesions
  • Previous revascularization of the symptomatic carotid stenosis
  • History of bleeding disorder
  • Unstable angina
  • to dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Contraindication to MRI
  • of less than 2 years
  • Percutaneaous or surgical intervention within 30 days before or after the study procedure
  • Stenotic lesion on arterial workup appeared as not a factor in the selection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    surgical arm

    carotid endarterectomy

    Procedure: carotid endarterectomy

  • Active comparator
    Stenting arm

    Carotid artery stenting

    Procedure: Carotid artery stenting

Interventions

  • Procedurecarotid endarterectomy

    Carotid endarterectomy is a surgical procedure used to reduce the risk of stroke due to carotid artery stenosis. During an endarterectomy, the surgeon opens the artery and removes the plaque.

  • ProcedureCarotid artery stenting

    Carotid artery stenting is an endovascular procedure in which a stent is deployed in the lumen of the carotid artery to treat narrowing of the carotid artery and reduce the risk of stroke.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DWI Lesion Detection Rate

    Imaging endpoint : Proportion of patients having at least one new lesion on post-treatment Diffusion-Weigthed Imaging (DWI) MRI compared to pre-treatment DWI MRI and confirmed by a core lab. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.

    Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Profile of lesions

    Imaging endpoint : Number and size of new lesions on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.

    Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure

  2. Vessel Occlusion Profile

    Imaging endpoint : Proportion of patients having a new intracranial vessel occlusion on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.

    Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure

  3. Hemorrhage

    Imaging endpoint : Hemorrhagic transformation on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.

    Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure

  4. Stroke/Mortality

    Clinical endpoint : proportion of patients having any stroke or death during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  5. Stroke Incidence Rate

    Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having any stroke during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  6. Severe Stroke Incidence

    Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having any disabling or fatal stroke during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  7. Mortality

    Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients who died during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  8. TIA Incidence

    Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having a Transient ischemic attack during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  9. MI Occurrence

    Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having myocardial infarction during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  10. Local complication

    Clinical endpoint : cervical or groin or radial hematoma, infection, arteriovenous fistula at puncture site, lower-limb arterial occlusion during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  11. Cranial Nerve Injury Events

    Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having cranial nerve injury during periprocedural period.

    Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure

  12. Hospitalization Duration

    Healthcare endpoint : number of days the patient stayed in the hospital stay

    Time frame: From the date of the carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) procedure until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days

  13. Procedure Delay

    Operational endpoint: number of days between the date at which the patient is randomized and the date at which the carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy) is proceeded

    Time frame: From the date of patient randomization until the date of carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) procedure, assessed up to 15 days

  14. Ischemic Events

    Clinical endpoint: Incidence of ischemic events among patients with confirmed new lesions on post-procedure DWI MRI (as verified by core lab assessment). The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.

    Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure.

  15. Hemorrhage

    Imaging endpoint : Hemorrhagic transformation on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.

    Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Two years after the last publication

Access criteria: Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractualization. Processing of shared data must comply with GDPR.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2028, 32 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 32 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2025
First posted
Jul 8, 2025
StartActual
Jul 16, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Mar 16, 2028
CompletionEst.
Mar 16, 2028
Last update
Jul 24, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07054060
Collaborators
Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 8, 2025
Start date
Jul 16, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 16, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 16, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 24, 2025

Study contacts

David Calvet, Professor
Contact
d.calvet@ghu-paris.fr
+33145658634
David Calvet, Professor
study director · GHU Sainte-Anne, PARIS
Benjamin GORY, Professor
study director · Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Antoine MILLON, Professor
study director · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion