CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07053176Updated Jul 8, 2025

Impact of Local Lidocaine Paravertebral Cervical Injection on Cervicogenic Dizziness Symptoms

A Phase 4 interventional study of 0.5% Lidocaine and Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%) in Cervicogenic Dizziness, sponsored by Uniter Onlus. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-08.

Sponsored by Uniter Onlus · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

at least 42 patients affected by cervicogenic dizziness will be allocated to the experimental group or in the placebo group. in the first group patients will received 2 paravertebral intramuscular injection of lidocaine 0.5% while in the placebo group they will received saline solution with the same injection technique. patients will be evaluated by subjective and objective testing before the treatment, immediatly and 3 months after the treatment.

Read the detailed description

at least 42 patients affected by cervicogenic dizziness will be allocated to the experimental group or in the placebo group. in the first group patients will received 2 paravertebral intramuscular injection of lidocaine 0.5% while in the placebo group they will received saline solution with the same injection technique. patients will be evaluated by subjective and objective testing before the treatment, immediatly and 3 months after the treatment. subjective testing will include dizziness handicap inventory, Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain Intensity, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Objective testing will include cervical range of motion, joint position error and static posturography testing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervicogenic Dizziness
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1) presence of a subjective feeling of dizziness associated with pain, movement, rigidity, or certain positions of the neck at least from 3months; 2) Cervical pain, trauma, and/or disease (3) If from traumatic origin, there has to be a temporal proximity between the onset of dizziness and the neck injury.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Exclusion of these differential diagnoses: (a) Migrainous vertigo (b) Vertigo of central origin (c) Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (d) Meniere disease (e) Vestibular neuritis (f) Vertigo induced by drugs (g) Psychogenic vertigo (anxiety and/or panic disorder and/or phobia) (h) Orthostatic hypotension
  2. presence of trauma or recent surgery in the head, face, neck, or chest; an otorhinolaryngological diagnosis of central or peripheral vertigo, and receiving physiotherapy or other treatment during the study period.
  3. allergy to lidocaine
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
42 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine

    patients will received lidocaine paravertebral injection

    Drug: 0.5% Lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham

    patients will received saline solution paravertebral injection

    Drug: Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)

Interventions

  • Drug0.5% Lidocaine

    0.5% lidocaine injection will be administered in the paravertebral intramuscular region with 12 mm, 30 G needle from C2 to C7 bilaterally

  • DrugSaline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)

    saline solution will be administered bilaterally in the paravertebral intamuscular region from C2 to C7 with 12 mm 30 G needle

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dizziness Handicap Inventory

    Dizziness Handicap Inventory version comprises 25 questions designed to assess a patient's functional (9 questions), emotional (9 questions), and physical (7 questions) limitations on a three-point scale, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived handicap

    Time frame: one monthe

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability Index

    This is conceived in a single-factor structure including 10 items to survey different activities of daily living on a 6-point Likert-type scale (from 0 to 5). Higher values score more severe pain and worse disability.

    Time frame: one month

  2. Neck Pain Intensity

    Neck Pain Intensity will be assessed by means of the visual analogue scale for pain. This reliable tool is conceived as a 100-mm horizontal line between the extremes 'no pain' and 'worst imaginable pain', on the left and on the right respectively.

    Time frame: one month

  3. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

    Within this 17 item self-report tool each question will be scored using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree); 4 questions (4, 8, 12 and 16) were negatively worded and reversely scored. Higher values score a higher degree of kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: one month

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

    This self-administered tool includes 14 questions, rated on a 4-point Likert type scale (from 0 to 3 points), with higher scores reflecting abnormal anxiety and depression levels. The questionnaire encompasses two subscales of seven items that evaluate anxiety and depression, respectively

    Time frame: one month

  5. The 36-item short form survey (SF-36)

    The 36-item short form survey (SF-36) was used for general health-related quality of life (Qol) assessment. the sf-36 is an established, validated, generic instrument that measures health-related Qol in diverse patient populations. it is based on a 36-item questionnaire with eight subscales and two component summaries of physical and mental health related QOL.

    Time frame: one month

  6. Cervical range of motion

    A cervical range of motion goniometer (Performance Attainment Associates, 3550 Lahore Rd, St Paul, MN), which has been shown to be a reliable tool with good validity, will be used to measure cervical spine movements. Active flexion, extension, left and right rotation, and left and right lateral flexion have been measured three times and then averaged

    Time frame: one month

  7. Static posturography testing

    Each patient will be instructed to keep an upright position on a standardized platform for static posturography (ED800 Medi-Care Solutions S.R.L. Euroclinic). The recording period will be 60s for each test (eyes closed or open while standing on the stiff platform) and the sampling frequency in the time domain was 25Hz. The center of pressure will be monitored, while performing the test. The posturographic parameters considered in our study will be the trace length (length), the surface of the ellipse of confi dence (surface),

    Time frame: one month

  8. Cervical relocation test (CRT)

    This test will be used to evaluate cervical proprioception. According to previous protocols, a headlamp with an integrated laser pointer is placed in the centre of the patient's forehead. The subject keeps a neutral head and neck position as he seats at 90cm from a wall in front of him. The point emitted by the laser pointer is then centred on a target fixed on the wall. We will use the target created by Rob Landel. With his eyes closed, the subject turns his head to the right, comes back to the initial position, and indicates verbally when he thinks his head is centred. Left rotation, flexion, and extension were also evaluated. Each movement is repeated three times and the patient opens his eyes and re-centers on the target between each measure. To assess the patient's result, we will calculated the mean distance in centimetres between eachpoint and the centre of the target, for each head position.

    Time frame: one month

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Uniter Onlus
    Fara in Sabina, Rieti 02032, Italy
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Micarelli A, Viziano A, Carlino P, Granito I, Micarelli RX, Alessandrini M. Reciprocal roles of joint position error, visual dependency and subjective perception in cervicogenic dizziness. Somatosens Mot Res. 2020 Dec;37(4):262-270. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2020.1803257. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32772608 ↗
  • Karadas O, Inan LE, Ulas U, Odabasi Z. Efficacy of local lidocaine application on anxiety and depression and its curative effect on patients with chronic tension-type headache. Eur Neurol. 2013;70(1-2):95-101. doi: 10.1159/000350619. Epub 2013 Jul 2. PubMed 23839118 ↗
  • Raeissadat SA, Rayegani SM, Sadeghi F, Rahimi-Dehgolan S. Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients. J Pain Res. 2018 Jun 29;11:1273-1279. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S164629. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29988746 ↗
  • Mellick LB, Mellick GA. Treatment of acute orofacial pain with lower cervical intramuscular bupivacaine injections: a 1-year retrospective review of 114 patients. J Orofac Pain. 2008 Winter;22(1):57-64. PubMed 18351035 ↗
  • Ferrara PE, Ronconi G, Viscito R, Pascuzzo R, Rosulescu E, Ljoka C, Maggi L, Ferriero G, Foti C. Efficacy of mesotherapy using drugs versus normal saline solution in chronic spinal pain: a retrospective study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Jun;40(2):171-174. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000214. PubMed 28125435 ↗
  • Micarelli A, Viziano A, Augimeri I, Micarelli B, Capoccia D, Alessandrini M. Diagnostic route of cervicogenic dizziness: usefulness of posturography, objective and subjective testing implementation and their correlation. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(12):1730-1737. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1680747. Epub 2019 Oct 26. PubMed 31656108 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07053176
Lead sponsor
Uniter Onlus
Responsible party
Alessandro Micarelli (UNITER ONLUS, Uniter Onlus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 8, 2025
Start date
Aug 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 15, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion