CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07051668RightCallUpdated Aug 15, 2025

The RightCall: Implementing a Sepsis Diagnostic Toolkit to Improve Pediatric Diagnosis in ED Transfer Calls

An interventional study of Pediatric Sepsis Diagnostic Toolkit in Sepsis, Diagnosis and Emergencies, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Month and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-15.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
1 Month and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sepsis is a leading cause of death in children, and an early diagnosis that improves outcomes is less likely in children who are treated in general Emergency Departments (EDs), that treat adults and children, compared to pediatric Emergency Departments. The study team, in collaboration with invested clinicians and expert partners, has developed a pediatric sepsis diagnostic safety toolkit that we will implement in a pediatric health system's transfer call center. Preparation for launch of the toolkit will include education throughout Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO), with a focus on transfer center nurses and accepting CHCO physicians who will be partnering in delivering the toolkit. Usual avenues for clinical education will be used, including meetings, endorsement from clinical leaders, emails, and physical materials such as badge and pocket cards. Referring Emergency Department (ED) providers outside of CHCO will not receive education about the toolkit by design, since they are the recipients of the toolkit which is designed to disseminate sepsis diagnostic knowledge in real time to general EDs within existing transfer workflows. This research will test whether the toolkit improves early pediatric sepsis diagnosis in general EDs where most children receive their first critical hours of care.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial to evaluate a sepsis diagnostic safety toolkit. The study team will use explanatory mixed methods to assess quantitative and qualitative metrics, including PRISM contextual factors and RE-AIM outcomes such as accuracy, adoption, adaptations, sustainability, and context.

The study team will conduct a pre/post-evaluation of the toolkit to measure effectiveness outcomes; and also will evaluate additional implementation outcomes using quantitative and qualitative approaches.

The study will consist of a 24 month pre-intervention period and a 24-month post-intervention period, capturing the same sepsis seasonality during both phases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Diagnosis
  • Emergencies

Keywords

  • Pediatric, Diagnosis
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,499 studies on the registry; 315 are open to participants now.

Of its 139 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 89 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients transferred to Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) for emergency or inpatient care, as identified in the extant CHCO transfer center database AND in the extant CHCO quality improvement sepsis database AND one of the following:
  • Patients who met Phoenix sepsis criteria 1) in the referring ED, 2) during transport, 3) in the first 6 hours after arrival at the pediatric hospital, or 4) patients who developed Phoenix sepsis within 24 hours of arrival at the Children's Hospital underwent independent physician review by three emergency physicians. Patients in whom all three physicians agreed sepsis was most likely present, using the structured SaferDx tool were included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than one month of age
  • Patients whose transfer call recording was not available in the database
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Pre-implementation Phase (usual care)

    Historic standards of care were used by all clinicians during the 24-month pre-implementation phase. This can also be referred to as usual care.

  • Active comparator
    Post-implementation Phase (using Diagnostic Toolkit)

    The Pediatric Sepsis Diagnostic Toolkit will be used during the post-implementation phase to better diagnose sepsis in transfer cases.

    Other: Pediatric Sepsis Diagnostic Toolkit

Interventions

  • OtherPediatric Sepsis Diagnostic Toolkit

    The toolkit consists of the following items: 1) a recommendation to request and report vital signs in all pediatric hospital/ED transfers, 2) dissemination of evidence based pediatric sepsis diagnostic criteria to accepting and referring providers and transfer nurses, and 3) accepting physician education in conversational strategies to promote improved diagnostic accuracy during pediatric transfer conversations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy

    Proportion of included patients in whom all 3 of the following occur while the patient is physically in the referring hospital: 1) verbal or written use of the term "sepsis", 2) Intravenous antibiotics ordered,and 3) intravenous flue bolus ordered.

    Time frame: measured at the end of the 24 month post-implementation period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Vital Signs Reported on Transfer Phone Call

    Proportion of included patients with any vital sign reported during the transfer phone call.

    Time frame: measured at the end of the 24 month post-implementation period

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
    • Halden Scott, MD · Contact
    • Halden Scott, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 7, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Patient Electronic Health Record (EHR) data will be stored in Excel (csv) files for data analysis at University of Colorado. Cleaned and deidentified datasets in SAS or R statistical software will be shared upon request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07051668
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 4, 2025
Start date
Jul 8, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 15, 2025

Study contacts

Halden F. Scott, MD, MSCS
Contact
halden.scott@cuanschutz.edu
215-520-7217
ALISON W. SAVILLE, MSW, MPH
Contact
alison.saville@cuanschutz.edu
7202574406
Halden F. Scott, MD, MSCS
principal investigator · University of Colorado School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion