CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07046910Updated Mar 17, 2026

Developing Hyperpolarized Gas MRI Signatures to Detect and Manage Acute Cellular Rejection

A Phase 2 interventional study of Sub study (Active): Two Lung MRI study with two navigational Bronchoscopy and Hyperpolarized Xenon129 in Lung Transplant Rejection, sponsored by University of Virginia. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-17.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2019, registered Jun 2025).
  • Started Apr 2019; still recruiting 7 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lung transplantation (LT) is the only definitive therapy for many patients with end-stage lung diseases. The supply of donors' lungs is the biggest bottleneck to performing a lung transplant, and many patients die while waiting. Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) is a significant risk factor for developing chronic allograft failure, a primary reason for death in this patient population. These observations highlight the importance of early diagnosis and management of ACR to prevent chronic graft failure. The preliminary results support the idea that Hyperpolarized Gas Magnetic Resonance Imaging has excellent potential to address this clinical gap. This study hypothesizes that optimized hyperpolarized gas magnetic resonance imaging (HGMRI) signatures can detect early pathophysiologic derangements in lung allografts consistent with ACR. This study also hypothesizes that the optimized HGMRI signatures will correlate with single-cell transcriptomic signatures that reflect dysregulated immune responses associated with ACR.

Read the detailed description

Lung transplantation (LT) is the only definitive therapy for subjects with end-stage lung diseases. The supply of donors' lungs is the biggest bottleneck to performing a lung transplant, and many patients die while waiting. Many lung transplant recipients experience at least one acute rejection episode after transplantation. Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) is a significant risk factor for developing chronic allograft failure, a primary reason for death in this patient population. These observations highlight the importance of early diagnosis and management of ACR to prevent chronic graft failure. The preliminary results support the idea that Hyperpolarized Gas Magnetic Resonance Imaging (HGMRI) signatures have excellent potential to address this clinical gap. In lung transplant patients without suspicion of ACR, HGMRI detected subtle, regional abnormalities in pulmonary physiology that were not detected by pulmonary function tests (PFTs) or high-resolution chest computer tomography (HRCT). Biopsy-proven regions of ACR in these subjects exhibited worse airflow and gas exchange HGMRI signatures, which corroborated well with the tissue pathology diagnosis of ACR. This data demonstrates the potential of HGMRI signatures to detect ACR even when existing clinical tools cannot. By merging anatomic CT and physiologic HGMRI readouts, the previous study developed a method to identify the airways that led to the allograft segments with abnormal HGMRI signatures. Then, a method to sample these areas of allografts is enabled during routine surveillance bronchoscopy by mapping the airways leading to dysfunctional allograft regions to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of clinical bronchoscopy. The primary molecular driver of ACR is the exaggerated host immune response to the donor's lungs. The anticipated results are that within the same subject, the single-cell transcriptome of cells from lung regions with abnormal HGMRI signatures would be more immunologically abnormal than those with normal HGMRI signatures. The hypothesis is that optimized HGMRI signatures can detect early pathophysiologic derangements in lung allografts consistent with ACR. The second hypothesis is that the optimized HGMRI signatures correlate with single-cell transcriptomic signatures reflecting the dysregulated immune responses underlying ACR. This study proposes: Aim 1: Determine the optimized HGMRI signatures to detect early regional allograft dysfunction consistent with ACR in lung allografts at the baseline Visit 1 (V1); Aim 2: Determine how the within-subject longitudinal changes in regional HGMRI signatures over a 1-year follow-up Visit 2 (V2) correlate with a clinical diagnosis of ACR.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Transplant Rejection

Keywords

  • lung transplant
  • hyperpolarized xenon-129 MRI
  • bronchoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All subjects must be willing to participate and undergo the procedure, and be managed as outpatients
  • HXe MRI-specific Inclusion
  • All patients who successfully underwent a lung transplant at the University of Virginia
  • Followed by the medical lung transplant team for the post-lung transplant rejection surveillance program at the University of Virginia
  • a clinical diagnosis of lung transplant within the past 12 months
  • absence of any significant allograft dysfunction/rejection at the time of the 12-month surveillance bronchoscopy
  • the ability to understand a written informed consent form and comply with the requirements of the study.
  • have an acceptable pre-bronchoscopy pulmonary function test: FEV1>45% before use of any bronchodilator
  • Must have acceptable pre-procedural screening studies.
  • Complete Blood Count: normal WBC, Hgb, and PLT
  • PT: Normal \< 1.2
  • Basic Metabolic Panel: Normal

    1. Scenario 1 (two visits): Standard bronchoscopy with Normal MRI results and without a diagnosis of acute rejection after bronchoscopy.
    2. Scenario 2 (two visits): Navigational bronchoscopy with abnormal MRI result but without a diagnosis of acute rejection after bronchoscopy by clinical pathology.
    3. Scenario 3 (three or four visits): Navigational bronchoscopy with abnormal MRI result and a diagnosis of acute rejection after bronchoscopy by clinical pathology at the first visit, the second visit, or both visits.
    4. Scenario 4 (one visit): Subjects who previously signed Part 2 Substudy corresponding to the First HXe MRI visit of the Part 3 Substudy (6 or 12 month evaluation). They will be asked to join the Part 3 Substudy to undergo a 24-month follow-up evaluation, including MRI and bronchoscopy, as described for Scenarios 1, 2, or 3.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

<!-- -->

  1. Unable to Consent
  2. Continuous oxygen use at home.
  3. Blood oxygen saturation of less than 92% as measured by pulse oximetry on the day of imaging.
  4. FEV1 percent predicted less than 25%.
  5. Pregnancy or lactation.
  6. Claustrophobia, inner ear implants, aneurysms or other surgical clips, metal foreign bodies in the eye, pacemakers, or other contraindications to MR scanning. Subjects with any implanted device that cannot be verified as MRI compliant will be excluded.
  7. Chest circumference greater than that of the xenon MR and/or helium coil. The circumference of the coil is approximately 42 inches.
  8. History of congenital cardiac disease, chronic renal failure, or cirrhosis.
  9. Inability to understand simple instructions or to hold still for approximately 10 seconds.
  10. History of respiratory infection within 2 weeks prior to the MR scan
  11. History of MI, stroke, and/or poorly controlled hypertension.
  12. Failure to complete study-related procedures
  13. Unavailability of a reliable communication network and contacts for follow-up with the second in-house backup contact
  14. Patient actively smokes.
  15. Before 48 hours, any event being considered to be too risky to preclude surveillance bronchoscopy: SaO2 \<90%, >16 puffs/24 hours of short-acting β-agonist (SABA), worsening symptoms prompting the use of any inhalers, FEV1 \< 45% before using a bronchodilator.
  16. acute or chronic renal failure
  17. uncontrolled coronary artery disease or congestive heart failure; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; uncontrolled hypertension, liver disease; history of neurologic diseases, including stroke, any disease concerning fibrotic processes.
  18. Pregnant females will be excluded
  19. Claustrophobic or too large to fit into the available MR chest RF coils.

    -

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Substudy(Active): Two Longitudinal Lung MRI study with two navigational Bronchoscopy

    * blood * urine * Two navigational bronchoscopies and two MRIs for tissue

    Diagnostic Test: Sub study (Active): Two Lung MRI study with two navigational Bronchoscopy · Drug: Hyperpolarized Xenon129

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSub study (Active): Two Lung MRI study with two navigational Bronchoscopy

    Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI twice with navigational bronchoscopy twice

    Also known as: Lung transplant recipient without HXe MRI prior to navigational bronchoscopy

  • DrugHyperpolarized Xenon129

    Lung transplant recipient with hyperpolarized Xe129 in MRI as an inhalation contrast agent

    Also known as: MRI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of Ventilation Defect Percent by MRI (continuous variable %VDP)

    The outcome of Airway abnormalities suggestive of acute rejection

    Time frame: 6 or 12 months then 24 months after the date of lung transplant surgery

  2. Measurement of Lung gas exchange capacity by MRI (continuous variable of red blood cell gas exchange function called RBC/Gas)

    The outcome of Lung parenchymal gas exchange abnormalities suggestive of acute rejection

    Time frame: 6 or 12 months then 24 months after the date of lung transplant surgery

  3. Measurement of the Single-cell RNA-sequencing of the bronchoalveolar lavage cells (Top 25 gene signatures over-expressed in lung area with acute rejection)

    What the Single-cell transcriptomic signatures being suggestive of acute rejection

    Time frame: 6 or 12 months then 24 months after the date of last HXe MRI

  4. Measurement of Pulmonary function test (Spirometry)

    Determining what the Clinical pulmonary function test suggestive of acute rejection

    Time frame: 6 or 12 months then 24 months after the date of last HXe MRI

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified individual-level data will be made available at publication or at the time of study completion per the funding agency's policy (NIH/NHLBI).

Supporting information: Csr

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07046910
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Y. Michael Shim, MD (Associate Professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 2, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 17, 2026

Study contacts

Carol Bampoe, BS
Contact
cb3ff@uvahealth.org
434.243.9634
Roselove Asare, MA
Contact
rnn3b@uvahealth.org
434.243.6074
Yun M Shim, MD
principal investigator · University of Virginia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion