ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07028593CP-MINSUpdated Jan 28, 2026

Effects of Ciprofol on Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Propofol and ciprofol in Myocardial Injury, Thoracic Diseases and Thoracoscopic Surgery, sponsored by Tongji Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-28.

Sponsored by Tongji Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,058
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) refers to postoperative elevation of cardiac troponin (cTn) levels caused by underlying ischemic mechanisms (i.e., coronary artery supply-demand imbalance or atherosclerotic thrombosis) without obvious non-ischemic causes (such as pulmonary embolism), with at least one cTn concentration exceeding the 99th percentile of the test reference upper limit, regardless of whether clinical symptoms and ECG changes are present. MINS, including myocardial infarction and ischemic myocardial injury, typically occurs within 30 days after surgery, most commonly within the first 2 postoperative days. It is an independent risk factor for 30-day postoperative mortality and is also closely associated with increased risk of mortality and vascular complications within 2 years . MINS is a common cardiovascular complication after thoracic surgery. Therefore, reducing the incidence of MINS in non-cardiac thoracic surgery to improve patient outcomes is a critical issue in anesthetic management for thoracic surgery.

Ciprofol is a Class 1 innovative drug independently developed in China with global intellectual property rights. Currently, Ciprofol has completed Phase III clinical trials in China and the United States; its approved indications in China include sedation or anesthesia for various diagnostic procedures, general anesthesia for surgical operations, and sedation during intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Completed drug clinical trials and published clinical trial data of Ciprofol indicate that it can better maintain circulatory stability and ideal anesthetic depth during anesthesia induction and maintenance, making it a promising intravenous general anesthetic alternative to propofol.

Maintaining hemodynamic stability is an important measure to reduce cardiovascular complications during the perioperative period. Given the good circulatory stability and sedative efficacy of Ciprofol, this study aims to investigate the impact of Ciprofol on MINS in non-cardiac thoracic surgery.

Read the detailed description

Lung cancer ranks first in both incidence and mortality among malignant tumors in China. In 2022, there were 1,060,600 new lung cancer cases, accounting for 22.0% of all malignant tumors, and 733,300 deaths, accounting for 28.5% of all malignant tumor deaths. Radical surgical resection is the recommended preferred treatment for stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for anatomic lung resection has better safety and long-term efficacy than traditional surgical methods, with more than 73.7% of lung cancer surgeries in China using thoracoscopic approaches. Thoracic surgery easily induces significant perioperative hemodynamic fluctuations, increasing the risk of perioperative cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, thus posing great challenges to perioperative anesthetic safety and long-term patient outcomes.

Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) refers to postoperative elevation of cardiac troponin (cTn) levels caused by underlying ischemic mechanisms (i.e., coronary artery supply-demand imbalance or atherosclerotic thrombosis) without obvious non-ischemic causes (such as pulmonary embolism), with at least one cTn concentration exceeding the 99th percentile of the test reference upper limit, regardless of whether clinical symptoms and ECG changes are present. MINS, including myocardial infarction and ischemic myocardial injury, typically occurs within 30 days after surgery, most commonly within the first 2 postoperative days. It is an independent risk factor for 30-day postoperative mortality and is also closely associated with increased risk of mortality and vascular complications within 2 years. MINS is a common cardiovascular complication after thoracic surgery; the COP-AF study found that the incidence of MINS in non-cardiac thoracic surgery is 20.3% . Therefore, reducing the incidence of MINS in non-cardiac thoracic surgery to improve patient outcomes is a critical issue in anesthetic management for thoracic surgery.

Severe hemodynamic fluctuations are one of the important causes of perioperative induction of MINS, thus maintaining hemodynamic stability is a critical step to reduce MINS. Propofol is the most commonly used drug for anesthesia induction and maintenance in clinical practice, with advantages such as rapid onset, strong sedative efficacy, and quick recovery. However, due to its significant circulatory inhibitory effects, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension induced and maintained by propofol in patients without cardiovascular diseases is 25%-40%, increasing the risk of perioperative hypotension and adverse cardiovascular events, which poses great challenges to anesthetic management. Additionally, 80% of patients receiving propofol experience injection pain of varying degrees, which also reduces patient comfort during treatment. Therefore, developing a sedative with both good sedative efficacy and no or low circulatory inhibition has long been a desirable goal for anesthesiologists.

Ciprofol is a Class 1 innovative drug independently developed in China with global intellectual property rights. Its molecular structure is an analog of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol). Both Ciprofol and propofol act on γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA-A) receptors, causing hyperpolarization of GABAergic neurons, reducing the success rate of action potential generation, and achieving inhibition of the central nervous system to produce short and rapid sedative or anesthetic effects. Pharmacologically, Ciprofol not only retains the characteristics of propofol such as rapid onset, rapid elimination, and high sedative efficacy but also has a higher drug cost-effectiveness ratio and therapeutic index (in mouse experiments, the median effective dose for sedation of Ciprofol is 1.5 mg/kg, the median lethal dose is 9.9 mg/kg, and the therapeutic index is 6.6, while that of propofol is only 2.8). Furthermore, due to the lower drug concentration in the aqueous phase of the Ciprofol emulsion, the risk of injection pain is much lower than that of propofol, improving treatment comfort. Currently, Ciprofol has completed Phase III clinical trials in China and the United States; its approved indications in China include sedation or anesthesia for various diagnostic procedures, general anesthesia for surgical operations, and sedation during intensive care unit (ICU) stays. Completed drug clinical trials and published post-marketing clinical trial data of Ciprofol indicate that it can better maintain circulatory stability and ideal anesthetic depth during anesthesia induction and maintenance, making it a promising intravenous general anesthetic alternative to propofol.

Maintaining hemodynamic stability is an important measure to reduce cardiovascular complications during the perioperative period. Given the good circulatory stability and sedative efficacy of Ciprofol, this study aims to investigate the impact of Ciprofol on MINS in non-cardiac thoracic surgery.

After data collection, full Analysis Set (FAS): A population derived by minimally and reasonably excluding certain cases under the principle of Intention-to-Treat (ITT), where cases included in the FAS should not seriously violate the inclusion criteria. FAS will be used for the analysis of baseline data and primary efficacy endpoints.

Per-Protocol Set (PPS): All cases that comply with the trial protocol, are well-tolerated (patients who completed PED procedures), and have completed the content specified in the case report form. PPS is used for the analysis of primary efficacy endpoints.

Safety Set (SS): Refers to the actual data of subjects who received at least one dose of treatment after randomization and have recorded safety indicators.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myocardial Injury
  • Thoracic Diseases
  • Thoracoscopic Surgery

Keywords

  • Myocardial Injury after non-cardiac surgery
  • Ciprofol
  • propofol
  • Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
  • lung tumor
03

In context

Thoracic Diseases

72 studies on the registry are indexed under Thoracic Diseases; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,058 is above the median of 65 across 52 interventional studies indexed under Thoracic Diseases.

Browse Thoracic Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Tongji Hospital is the lead sponsor of 386 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS)-assisted thoracic surgery (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge resection of two or more lung tissues, mediastinal tumor resection) under general anesthesia;
  2. Aged 45 to 80 years (inclusive) at the time of randomization;
  3. Expected postoperative hospital stay of ≥3 days;
  4. Signed a written to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients allergic to propofol, Ciprofol, or analogs of drug components (soybeans, eggs, milk);
  2. Patients with unstable angina;
  3. Patients with congestive heart failure or hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor agents;
  4. Patients with severe ( \< 1 L);
  5. [eGFR] \< 30 mL/min/1.73m²;
  6. Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction ( or AST elevation exceeding 1.5 times the );
  7. Male or female patients planning to conceive within the next 3 months;
  8. Pregnant or lactating female patients;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,058 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ciprofol group

    Slowly administer sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg to 0.7 μg/kg via intravenous injection; cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg to 0.20 mg/kg; Ciprofol 0.4 ml/kg to 0.6 ml/kg via slow intravenous injection. The injection time for all drugs is 2 minutes.

    Drug: ciprofol

  • Active comparator
    propofol group

    Slowly administer sufentanil 0.2 μg/kg to 0.7 μg/kg via intravenous injection; cis-atracurium 0.15 mg/kg to 0.20 mg/kg; propofol injection 0.1 ml/kg to 0.25 ml/kg slowly via intravenous injection. The injection time for all drugs is 2 minutes.

    Drug: Propofol

Interventions

  • Using as sedative agents in the total intravenous anesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic aurgery in propofol group.

  • Using as sedative agents in the total intravenous anesthesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic aurgery in ciprofol group.

    Also known as: HSK3486

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the incidence of myocardial Injury after non-cardiac surgery

    Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery is defined by elevated postoperative cardiac troponin concentrations that exceed the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit of the assay and are attributable to a presumed ischemic mechanism, with or without concomitant symptoms or signs

    Time frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. The proportion of new-onset atrial fibrillation

    diagnosed by 12 lead ECG.

    Time frame: within hospitalized stay after anesthesia induction

  2. The proportion of new-onset atrial fibrillation

    diagnosed by 12 lead ECG.

    Time frame: perioperatively

  3. The proportion of new-onset non-atrial fibrillation arrhythmia

    diagnosed by 12 lead ECG.

    Time frame: perioperatively

  4. The incidence and duration of perioperative hypotension

    assessing the effect of interventions on cardiovascular stability

    Time frame: between anesthesia induction and postoperative first 24 hour

  5. 30-day postoperative mortality rate

    assessing the survival outcome

    Time frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery

  6. New-onset myocardial infarction

    assessing the cardiovascular complications

    Time frame: Within the first 30 days after surgery

Other outcomes

  1. pain on injection of drugs

    NRS was used to evaluate the pain intensity

    Time frame: During anesthesisa induction

  2. the duration of bis>60 or bis <40

    assessing the sedative effcacy and avoding intraoperative awareness

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  3. Spontaneous respiration recovery time

    assessing the effect of interventions rescovery time

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  4. ermergence time

    assessing the effect of interventions rescovery time

    Time frame: intraoperatively

  5. Intraoperative dosage of vasoactive drug

    text the species and dosage of drugs

    Time frame: from anesthesia induction to PACU

  6. postoperative delirium

    assess with CAM-ICU

    Time frame: during stay in PACU

  7. The time stay in PACU

    assessing the effect of interventions rescovery quality

    Time frame: during stay in PACU

  8. the incidence of postoperative nausen and vomitting

    assessing the effect of interventions on PONV

    Time frame: perioperatively

  9. QoR-15

    using Chinsese edition QoR-15

    Time frame: postoperatively day 1 and day3

  10. Brice screening

    To assess intraoperative awareness

    Time frame: one time in PACU and anther one with postoperative day 1

  11. time to MOAA/S 0

    Assessing induction time duration

    Time frame: from the injection of propofol or ciprofol

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD; Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):e618-e651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617. No abstract available. PubMed 30571511 ↗
  • Lopez J, Borzak S. In noncardiac thoracic surgery, low-dose colchicine did not reduce AF or myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery at 14 d. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):JC3. doi: 10.7326/J23-0103. Epub 2024 Jan 2. PubMed 38163371 ↗
  • Conen D, Ke Wang M, Popova E, Chan MTV, Landoni G, Cata JP, Reimer C, McLean SR, Srinathan SK, Reyes JCT, Grande AM, Tallada AG, Sessler DI, Fleischmann E, Kabon B, Voltolini L, Cruz P, Maziak DE, Gutierrez-Soriano L, McIntyre WF, Tandon V, Martinez-Tellez E, Guerra-Londono JJ, DuMerton D, Wong RHL, McGuire AL, Kidane B, Roux DP, Shargall Y, Wells JR, Ofori SN, Vincent J, Xu L, Li Z, Eikelboom JW, Jolly SS, Healey JS, Devereaux PJ; COP-AF Investigators. Effect of colchicine on perioperative atrial fibrillation and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery in patients undergoing major thoracic surgery (COP-AF): an international randomised trial. Lancet. 2023 Nov 4;402(10413):1627-1635. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01689-6. Epub 2023 Aug 25. PubMed 37640035 ↗
  • Zucker M, Kagan G, Adi N, Ronel I, Matot I, Zac L, Goren O. Changes in mean systemic filling pressure as an estimate of hemodynamic response to anesthesia induction using propofol. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01773-8. PubMed 35869445 ↗
  • de Wit F, van Vliet AL, de Wilde RB, Jansen JR, Vuyk J, Aarts LP, de Jonge E, Veelo DP, Geerts BF. The effect of propofol on haemodynamics: cardiac output, venous return, mean systemic filling pressure, and vascular resistances. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):784-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew126. PubMed 27199311 ↗
  • Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, Shi YY, Hornuss C, Radke O, Pace NL, Apfel CC; Perioperative Clinical Research Core. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011 Mar 15;342:d1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1110. PubMed 21406529 ↗
  • Gan TJ, Bertoch T, Habib AS, Yan P, Zhou R, Lai YL, Liu X, Essandoh M, Daley WL, Gelb AW. Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial. Anesthesiology. 2024 Apr 1;140(4):690-700. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004886. PubMed 38150544 ↗
  • Qin L, Ren L, Wan S, Liu G, Luo X, Liu Z, Li F, Yu Y, Liu J, Wei Y. Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of Novel 2,6-Disubstituted Phenol Derivatives as General Anesthetics. J Med Chem. 2017 May 11;60(9):3606-3617. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00254. Epub 2017 Apr 28. PubMed 28430430 ↗
  • Liang P, Dai M, Wang X, Wang D, Yang M, Lin X, Zou X, Jiang K, Li Y, Wang L, Shangguan W, Ren J, He H. Efficacy and safety of ciprofol vs. propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;40(6):399-406. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001799. Epub 2023 Jan 19. PubMed 36647565 ↗
  • Wang X, Wang X, Liu J, Zuo YX, Zhu QM, Wei XC, Zou XH, Luo AL, Zhang FX, Li YL, Zheng H, Li H, Wang S, Wang DX, Guo QL, Liu CM, Wang YT, Zhu ZQ, Wang GY, Ai YQ, Xu MJ. Effects of ciprofol for the induction of general anesthesia in patients scheduled for elective surgery compared to propofol: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(5):1607-1617. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28228. PubMed 35302207 ↗
  • Zeng Y, Wang DX, Lin ZM, Liu J, Wei XC, Deng J, Liu YF, Ma EL, Yang MC, Zheng H, Yu XD, Guo QL, Guan YJ. Efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in elective surgical patients: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, propofol-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Feb;26(4):1114-1124. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202202_28101. PubMed 35253166 ↗
  • Liu Y, Yu X, Zhu D, Zeng J, Lin Q, Zang B, Chen C, Liu N, Liu X, Gao W, Guan X. Safety and efficacy of ciprofol vs. propofol for sedation in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation: a multi-center, open label, randomized, phase 2 trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 May 5;135(9):1043-1051. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001912. PubMed 34924506 ↗
  • Luo Z, Tu H, Zhang X, Wang X, Ouyang W, Wei X, Zou X, Zhu Z, Li Y, Shangguan W, Wu H, Wang Y, Guo Q. Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 for Anesthesia/Sedation in Patients Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Propofol-Controlled, Randomized, Phase 3 Study. CNS Drugs. 2022 Mar;36(3):301-313. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00890-1. Epub 2022 Feb 14. PubMed 35157236 ↗
  • Li J, Wang X, Liu J, Wang X, Li X, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Li J, Yao S, Zhu Z, Guo Q, Yu Y, Meng J, Zuo Y. Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Aug;131(2):138-148. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13761. Epub 2022 Jun 10. PubMed 35653554 ↗
  • Teng Y, Ou M, Wang X, Zhang W, Liu X, Liang Y, Li K, Wang Y, Ouyang W, Weng H, Li J, Yao S, Meng J, Shangguan W, Zuo Y, Zhu T, Liu B, Liu J. Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: Phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 Sep 1;164:105904. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105904. Epub 2021 Jun 8. PubMed 34116176 ↗
  • Puelacher C, Lurati Buse G, Seeberger D, Sazgary L, Marbot S, Lampart A, Espinola J, Kindler C, Hammerer A, Seeberger E, Strebel I, Wildi K, Twerenbold R, du Fay de Lavallaz J, Steiner L, Gurke L, Breidthardt T, Rentsch K, Buser A, Gualandro DM, Osswald S, Mueller C; BASEL-PMI Investigators. Perioperative Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: Incidence, Mortality, and Characterization. Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):1221-1232. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030114. Epub 2017 Dec 4. PubMed 29203498 ↗
  • Ruetzler K, Smilowitz NR, Berger JS, Devereaux PJ, Maron BA, Newby LK, de Jesus Perez V, Sessler DI, Wijeysundera DN. Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):e287-e305. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001024. Epub 2021 Oct 4. PubMed 34601955 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 27 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 29, 2025
First posted
Jun 19, 2025
StartActual
Jul 31, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Jan 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07028593
Lead sponsor
Tongji Hospital
Responsible party
Ailin Luo (Department of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 19, 2025
Start date
Jul 31, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2026

Study contacts

Ailin Luo, MD&PhD
Contact
alluo@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn
13507122565
Shiyong Li, MD&PhD
Contact
shiyongli@hust.edu.cn
15002780081

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ciprofol

Start the discussion