CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07025525Updated Jun 17, 2025

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Ultrasonic Activated Irrigation Versus Non Activated Irrigation in Pulpectomy of Necrotic Primary Molars : A Randomized Clinical Trial

An interventional study of Ultrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite and Ultrasonic acivated saline in Pulpectomy Agents, sponsored by Cairo University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-17.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Canal Irrigation Using Ultrasonically Activated vs. Non-Activated Irrigants in Pulpectomy of Necrotic Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial" This study aims to compare the effectiveness of using ultrasonically activated irrigant versus non-activated irrigant in terms of clinical and radiographic success rates in the pulpectomy of necrotic primary molars, through a randomized clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Primary teeth are considered of great importance to children allowing their normal, healthy development and growth while preserving function, eating, speech and normal development of occlusion while preserving the space for permanent dentition and guide their eruption.

Pulpectomy of primary molar teeth is considered as reasonable treatment approach to ensure either normal shedding or long term survival of 1ry teeth as fully functional component in dental arch.

Treatment of necrotic primary teeth is complex due to anatomical and physiological characteristics and high no. of bacterial species present in endodontic infection.

Treatment success depend on the elimination of root canal infection which can be done mechanically and chemically to ensure the complete removal of bacterial canal infection.

Irrigation is a key part of successful root canal treatment. It has several important functions, the most important one that it has a washing effect and an antimicrobial/antibiofilm effect. Irrigation is also the only way to impact those areas of the root canal wall not touched by mechanical instrumentation.

Ultrasonic activation cause irrigant streaming and cavitation phenomena resulting in significantly improved debridement of canal spaces, disruption of biofilm and improved penetration of irrigant into dentinal tubules and reduces bacterial level improving prognosis and ability to seal.

This study has been conducted by only few researchers, and there is limited evidence supporting the effect of ultrasonic activation on irrigation.

So this study is conducted to compare the effect of ultrasonic activation of irrigation on success of pulpectomy versus that of non-activated irrigation

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulpectomy Agents

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Primary molars
  • Irrigation activation within the canal
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-

Clinical Criteria:

  1. Children aged between 4 to 7 years' old
  2. Children with deep caries involving pulp in primary molars
  3. History of abscess, swelling or pus
  4. Pain on percussion
  5. Mobility grade 1

Radiographic criteria:

  1. Root resorption due to abscess less that ⅔ of root
  2. Periapical RL or furcation RL
  3. Widening in PDL space or loss of lamina dura continuity

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical criteria: -

    1. Refusal of participation.
    2. Patient unable to attend to follow up
    3. Non-restorable tooth.
    4. Medically compromised patient.
    5. Uncooperative patient
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group 1

    Ultrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite

    Device: Ultrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite

  • Experimental
    Intervention group 2

    Ultrasonic activated saline

    Other: Ultrasonic acivated saline

  • Experimental
    Intervention group 3

    Sodium hypochlorite

    Other: Sodium Hypochlorite Solution

  • Active comparator
    Control group 4

    Saline

    Other: Saline

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasonic activated sodium hypochlorite

    Using ultrasonic-activated sodium hypochlorite in the canals of primary molars can significantly enhance root canal disinfection by improving the irrigant's penetration and effectiveness. Primary molars often have complex and irregular canal anatomies, which can limit the reach of traditional irrigation methods. Ultrasonic activation creates acoustic streaming and cavitation effects, allowing sodium hypochlorite to better dissolve organic tissue and disrupt bacterial biofilms, especially in hard-to-reach areas. This leads to more thorough cleaning, reduced microbial load, and potentially better clinical outcomes in pediatric endodontics

  • OtherUltrasonic acivated saline

    using ultrasonic-activated saline within the canals of primary teeth lies in its ability to enhance mechanical debridement and improve irrigation effectiveness without the risks associated with stronger chemical agents. Although saline lacks inherent antimicrobial properties, ultrasonic activation generates acoustic streaming and cavitation, which help dislodge debris, disrupt biofilms, and clean intricate canal anatomy more efficiently than passive irrigation. This makes it a safer alternative in pediatric patients, minimizing the risk of cytotoxic effects or damage to developing permanent tooth buds while still improving cleaning outcomes.

  • OtherSodium Hypochlorite Solution

    using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) within the canals of primary molars is its excellent antimicrobial and tissue-dissolving properties, which are essential for effective root canal disinfection. Primary molars often have complex and irregular canal systems that harbor bacteria and necrotic tissue. Sodium hypochlorite not only helps eliminate a broad spectrum of microorganisms but also dissolves organic debris, improving canal cleanliness and reducing the risk of post-treatment infection. When used in appropriate concentrations, it can significantly enhance the success of pulpectomy procedures in pediatric patients while maintaining safety.

  • OtherSaline

    Saline is commonly used as an irrigant in the root canal treatment of primary molars due to its excellent biocompatibility and safety profile. It is a non-toxic, isotonic solution that poses no risk to the surrounding periapical tissues, which is particularly important in primary teeth where root resorption and open apices are common. This minimizes the chance of damaging the underlying permanent tooth germ, a critical consideration in pediatric dentistry. Saline is also safe if accidentally extruded beyond the apex or ingested, making it a suitable choice for young children.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Post operative pain

    Post operative pain assessments will be clinically , binary yes or no oral from patients word

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Soft tissue pathology

    This outcome will be measured clinically , binary yes or no by visual inspection

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Pain on percussion

    Will measured clinically , binary yes or no using back of mirror for percussion assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Pathological mobility

    Will be assessed clinically , binary by yes or no using back of mirror and finger of one hand to check mobility

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Furcation or periapical pathology

    Will be measured clinically by periapical radiograph binary yes or no the presence of Radiolucency

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. External or internal root resorption

    Will be assessed by radiograph binary yes or no checking radiolucency

    Time frame: 6 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of dentistry cairo university
    Cairo, Egypt
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Singh R, Barua P, Kumar M, Safaya R, Monajemi H, Monajemi H. Effect of Ultrasonic Instrumentation in Treatment of Primary Molars. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):750-753. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2120. PubMed 28874635 ↗
  • Virdee SS, Seymour DW, Farnell D, Bhamra G, Bhakta S. Efficacy of irrigant activation techniques in removing intracanal smear layer and debris from mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2018 Jun;51(6):605-621. doi: 10.1111/iej.12877. Epub 2017 Dec 22. PubMed 29178166 ↗
  • Kumar RS, Ankola AV, Sankeshwari RM, Hebbal M, Hampiholi V, Kumar S L, Deshpande AP, Choudhury AR, Pai Khot AJ. Effectiveness of various irrigant activation techniques on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into lateral canals of mature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Jan;35(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 16. PubMed 36817024 ↗
  • Ahmed, H.M.A., 2014. Pulpectomy procedures in primary molar teeth. European Journal of General Dentistry, 3(01), pp.3-10
  • Fabris AS, Nakano V, Avila-Campos MJ. Bacteriological analysis of necrotic pulp and fistulae in primary teeth. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Apr;22(2):118-24. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130358. PubMed 24676582 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07025525
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Naira Essam Farouk (Internal resident, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 17, 2025
Start date
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 17, 2025

Study contacts

Naira Essam Naira Essam resident intern
Contact
nayera.farouk@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
0201018567752

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion