ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07024056Updated Jun 22, 2025

Acute ACJ Dislocation Type (III&VI): CC Ligaments Reconstruction With AC Ligament Reconstruction vs. CC Ligaments Reconstruction With AC Temporary k Wire Fixation

An interventional study of coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction associated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction and coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction with acromioclavicular temporary k wire fixation in Acromioclavicular Joint and Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation, sponsored by Benha University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-22.

Sponsored by Benha University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographical outcome of patients treated by coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction associated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction versus coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction acromioclavicular temporary k wire fixation in management of Acute AC dislocation Rockwood type (III\&VI).

  • Number of patients (20)
  • Type of disease (AC dislocation Rockwood type (III\&VI)
  • follow up period (6 months)
  • type of study: this is a clinical research study
Read the detailed description

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACD) is one of the most common shoulder injuries and is usually sports related. Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries account for about 12% of all shoulder injuries in clinical practice, a rate that increases to almost 40% in athletes participating in contact sports.

Epidemiological studies showed that most AC joint injuries occur in the third decade of life, and the gender distribution is 5:1 in favor of men. Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries have been reported to especially occur in 20- to 30-year-old male patients engaging in high-contact sports.

The mechanism of injury leading to AC joint dislocation can be direct or indirect. A direct force on the superior aspect of the acromion process, it happen due to fall onto the outer aspect of the shoulder, is the most common scenario. The acromioclavicular capsule-ligamentous structures fail with consecutive loading of the coraco-clavicular (CC) ligaments.

The Four components of the acromioclavicular (AC) capsular ligaments and the two components of the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments contribute to AC joint stability depending upon the direction and magnitude of the force applied. The trapezoid ligament provides the major support against compressive loads applied along the axis of the clavicle and acts as a secondary restraint to superior translation. On the other hand, the conoid ligament contributes to both superior and anterior stability. Among the 4 AC capsular ligaments, the superior and posterior capsular ligaments, reinforced by the deltoid and trapezius muscle, are important due to their primary role in prevention of posterior translation. Despite the different contribution of each ligament on the stability of the AC joint, most current surgical techniques for complete AC joint dislocation focus on CC interval fixation to restore the CC ligaments.

Nonsurgical management is the mainstay of treatment for type I and II injuries, whereas surgery is usually recommended for type IV to VI injuries. The treatment for type III remains instead controversial as no clear treatment algorithm has been established.

Because of the distinct functional anatomy of the AC and CC ligaments, several studies provided good results focusing on anatomical surgical techniques that recreate those structures, rather than non-anatomical procedures that aim to improve function and stability regardless of restoration of anatomy of the torn ligaments. Although several anatomic reconstruction techniques are available, most of them showed promising results after conducting underpowered studies at short-term follow-up. Moreover, no gold standard has been identified yet.

Several surgical techniques have been described in the literature. Rockwood classified the early surgical treatments for AC joint instability into 4 groups: (1) AC ligament repairs, (2) CC ligaments repairs, (3) excision of the distal clavicle, and (4) dynamic muscle transfer. In addition, K-wires, screws, and plates have been used for temporary fixation of the AC joint. A better understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the AC joint and the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments has led to advances in surgical techniques. Anatomic reconstructions using free grafts have become popular in recent years. In addition, arthroscopically assisted procedures using cortical fixation devices have become more popular.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acromioclavicular Joint
  • Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Joint Dislocations

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Dislocations; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 60 interventional studies indexed under Joint Dislocations.

Browse Joint Dislocations studies →

Lead sponsor

Benha University is the lead sponsor of 362 studies on the registry; 66 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age at least 18 years old.
  • Acute AC dislocation Rockwood type VI.
  • Acute AC dislocation Rockwood type III patients with pre-injury high level of activity (work or athletic activity).
  • Patient is fit for surgery.
  • Patient is willing to participate.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic AC dislocation.
  • AC dislocation Rockwood type (I, II, IV and VI).
  • Previous surgery to the same shoulder, degenerative changes of the glenohumeral joint, shoulder infections, and concomitant neurologic diseases.
  • Associated neurological disorders in the affected limb.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction associated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction

    The Gracilis or SemiT graft will be harvested from the ipsilateral knee. The acromioclavicular joint will be exposed by the deltopectoral approach. A strap incision will be started from the acromioclavicular joint and extended distally towards the tip of coracoid process. 2 drill holes will be prepared on the superior cortex of the clavicle at the footprint of the original 2 ligaments, using a 4.5-mm drill bit. The 2 holes will be around 1.5 cm apart and the lateral hole was around 2 to 2.5 cm proximal to the distal end of the clavicle. Another 4.5 mm drill bit hole was created in the acromion. The graft exiting laterally around the coracoid is then passed through the conoid tunnel from inferior to superior and then passed through the acromial tunnel from superior to inferior to augment/reconstruct the AC joint capsule. The graft exiting the acromion tunnel is passed through the trapezoid tunnel from superior to inferior. The two free ends of the hamstring graft are tied together.

    Procedure: coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction associated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction

  • Active comparator
    coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction with acromioclavicular temporary k wire fixation

    Two 2.4-mm tunnels corresponding to the origins of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments will be created through the distal clavicle, approximately 1.5cm apart from each other. The distal tunnel will be 2.5cm away from the AC joint. After harvesting the Gracilis or Semitendinosus from the ipsilateral leg, the graft was prepared with no. 2 Ethibond sutures and passed beneath the coracoid. Both ends of the graft will be passed inside out through the tunnels after enlarging the tunnels by 4.5 drill bit making a figure of 8 sling. The AC joint will be provisionally reduced with two 1.5/1.8-mm smooth K-wires while keeping the graft ends under adequate manual tension. The ends of the graft will be sutured onto themselves and the surrounding soft tissues.

    Procedure: coracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction with acromioclavicular temporary k wire fixation

Interventions

  • Procedurecoracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction associated with acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction

    The Gracilis or SemiT graft will be harvested from the ipsilateral knee. An oblique skin incision will be made starting from the ACJ and extended distally towards the tip of coracoid process. 2 drill holes will be prepared on the superior cortex of the clavicle at the footprint of the original 2 ligaments, using a 4.5-mm drill bit. The 2 holes will be around 1 cm apart and the lateral hole was around 2 to 2.5 cm proximal to the distal end of the clavicle. Another 4.5 mm drill bit hole was created in the acromion. The graft exiting laterally around the coracoid will be then passed through the conoid tunnel from inferior to superior and then passed through the acromial tunnel from superior to inferior. The graft exiting the acromion tunnel will be passed through the trapezoid tunnel from superior to inferior. The two free ends of the hamstring graft will be tied to one another with Ethibond No.2 sutures

  • Procedurecoracoclavicular ligaments reconstruction with acromioclavicular temporary k wire fixation

    Two 2.4-mm tunnels corresponding to the origins of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments will be created through the distal clavicle, approximately 1.5cm apart from each other. The distal tunnel will be 2.5cm away from the AC joint. After harvesting the Gracilis or Semitendinosus from the ipsilateral leg, the graft was prepared with no. 2 Ethibond sutures and passed beneath the coracoid. Both ends of the graft will be passed inside out through the tunnels after enlarging the tunnels by 4.5 drill bit making a figure of 8 sling. The AC joint will be provisionally reduced with two 1.5/1.8-mm smooth K-wires while keeping the graft ends under adequate manual tension. The ends of the graft will be sutured onto themselves and the surrounding soft tissues. The wound will be closed in layers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. complications

    Redislocations. Other local complications, eg. infection.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Constant-Murley Score

    Constant-Murley Score (range: 0-100). Higher scores indicate better shoulder function. Scores above 80 generally reflect excellent shoulder performance.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Frantz T, Ramkumar PN, Frangiamore S, Jones G, Soloff L, Kvit A, Curriero FC, Schickendantz M. Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injuries in professional baseball: analysis from the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 Jun 9. PubMed 32778383 ↗
  • Saccomanno MF, Fodale M, Capasso L, Cazzato G, Milano G. Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with semitendinosus tendon graft: a pilot study. Joints. 2014 May 8;2(1):6-14. eCollection 2014 Jan-Mar. PubMed 25606535 ↗
  • Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD. Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2072-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546512450162. Epub 2012 Jun 15. PubMed 22707749 ↗
  • Sirin E, Aydin N, Mert Topkar O. Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis, classification and ligamentoplasty procedures. EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Jul 17;3(7):426-433. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170027. eCollection 2018 Jul. PubMed 30233818 ↗
  • Nolte PC, Lacheta L, Dekker TJ, Elrick BP, Millett PJ. Optimal Management of Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Current Perspectives. Orthop Res Rev. 2020 Mar 5;12:27-44. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S218991. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32184680 ↗
  • Shin SJ, Campbell S, Scott J, McGarry MH, Lee TQ. Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Sep;22(9):2216-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x. Epub 2013 Jul 11. PubMed 23842800 ↗
  • Frank RM, Cotter EJ, Leroux TS, Romeo AA. Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries: Evidence-based Treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019 Sep 1;27(17):e775-e788. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00105. PubMed 31008872 ↗
  • Xara-Leite F, Andrade R, Moreira PS, Coutinho L, Ayeni OR, Sevivas N, Espregueira-Mendes J. Anatomic and non-anatomic reconstruction improves post-operative outcomes in chronic acromio-clavicular instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Dec;27(12):3779-3796. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05408-3. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 30806755 ↗
  • Moatshe G, Kruckeberg BM, Chahla J, Godin JA, Cinque ME, Provencher MT, LaPrade RF. Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Arthroscopy. 2018 Jun;34(6):1979-1995.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Mar 21. PubMed 29573931 ↗
  • Garofalo R, Ceccarelli E, Castagna A, Calvisi V, Flanagin B, Conti M, Krishnan SG. Open capsular and ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus hamstring autograft successfully controls superior and posterior translation for type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Jul;25(7):1989-1994. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4509-7. Epub 2017 Apr 22. PubMed 28434037 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2025; primary completion for Jul 2026, 12 months later.

Of 24 interventional studies with no phase under Joint Dislocations, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 9, 2025
First posted
Jun 17, 2025
StartEst.
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Aug 2026
Last update
Jun 22, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07024056
Lead sponsor
Benha University
Responsible party
Amr Ahmed ElSherif (Resident, Shebin El-Kom Teaching Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 17, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2025

Study contacts

Sherif Eltraigy, Ass. Prof.
Contact
shareefaltraigy@fmed.bu.edu.eg
+201221754037

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion