CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07520669Updated Jul 10, 2026

Does Capsuloplasty Reduce External Rotation After Coracoid Impingement?

An interventional study of Open coracoid impingement repair without capsuloplasty and Open coracoid impingement repair with capsuloplasty in Shoulder Anterior Latarjet Instability, sponsored by Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-10.

Sponsored by Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The coracoid anchor (Latarjet procedure) is the gold standard technique for treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Despite excellent postoperative stability, a reduction in external rotation has been reported, which can affect function, glenohumeral kinematics, and return to sports, particularly among athletes in combat and contact sports.

The combination of an anterior capsuloplasty with the coracoid buttress is performed inconsistently among surgeons, with no consensus; the capsular repair techniques associated with the Latarjet procedure vary widely among teams. Some teams routinely perform capsular repair to enhance stability and reposition the capsule on the glenoid rim, while others consider it non-essential and potentially responsible for further limiting external rotation.

To date, there are few studies specifically evaluating the impact of capsuloplasty on joint range of motion beyond the end-stop, and the available results remain contradictory. In 2023, the team of Kim et al. suggested that the Latarjet technique without capsular repair resulted in good restoration of laxity and good clinical outcomes, with less early postoperative limitation of external rotation than that observed with the same technique combined with capsular repair. Nevertheless, at 1 year, there was no significant deficit in external rotation between the two groups.

A prospective randomized comparative analysis will determine whether the addition of capsuloplasty significantly alters ranges of motion, given identical surgical and rehabilitation protocols. The results could clarify the indications for this procedure, optimize surgical practices, and improve recommendations for the management of shoulder instability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shoulder Anterior Latarjet Instability

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • instability
  • dislocation
  • Latarjet
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Standard indications for surgery (glenoid bone loss, advanced Hill-Sachs lesion, failed Bankart repair, contact sports, etc.).
  • Shoulder not previously operated on

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant associated rotator cuff pathology, associated SLAP lesion
  • Advanced glenohumeral osteoarthritis.
  • Recurrent impingement, history of shoulder surgery
  • Presence of severe external rotation deficit of the shoulder prior to surgery
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
104 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Open coracoid impingement repair without capsuloplasty

    Procedure: Open coracoid impingement repair without capsuloplasty

  • Experimental
    Open coracoid impingement repair with standardized anterior capsuloplasty

    Procedure: Open coracoid impingement repair with capsuloplasty

Interventions

  • ProcedureOpen coracoid impingement repair without capsuloplasty

    All patients undergo an open coracoid osteotomy performed using the center's standard technique. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia combined with an interscalene block. The patient is positioned in a semi-sitting position. The approach is delto-pectoral; an osteotomy of the coracoid process is performed after detachment of the acromiocoracoid ligament and the pectoralis minor tendon. A tunnel is created through the subscapularis muscle, followed by a horizontal capsulotomy with placement of guide sutures on both capsular margins. The glenoid is re-contoured, and the stop is then fixed to the glenoid with two screws (Asnis-Stryker, 3.5 mm in diameter).

  • ProcedureOpen coracoid impingement repair with capsuloplasty

    All patients undergo an open coracoid osteotomy performed using the center's standard technique. The procedure is performed under general anesthesia combined with an interscalene block. The patient is positioned in a semi-sitting position. The approach is delto-pectoral; an osteotomy of the coracoid process is performed after detachment of the acromiocoracoid ligament and the pectoralis minor tendon. A tunnel is created through the subscapularis muscle, followed by a horizontal capsulotomy with placement of guide sutures on both capsular margins. The glenoid is re-contoured, and the stop is then fixed to the glenoid with two screws (Asnis-Stryker, 3.5 mm in diameter). Anterior capsuloplasty is performed using a predefined, reproducible technique: horizontal, with an anchor.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of external rotation

    arm against the body and in 90° abduction : measure of range of external rotation

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of instability

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

  2. Rowe score

    Score with 4 parts : * mobility (10 points) * function (50 points) * pain (10 points) * stability (30 points) Each part is scored with a Likert scale (3 or 4 points). Total scoring is / 100 points.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Clinique du Sport
    Mérignac, 33700, France
    • Marion Mandon, PhD · Contact · mmandon@vivalto-sante.com · +33 6 78 27 76 72
    • Florent Baldairon, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07520669
Lead sponsor
Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux Mérignac
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 9, 2026
Start date
Jul 2, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2026

Study contacts

Marion Mandon, PhD
Contact
mmandon@vivalto-sante.com
+33 6 78 27 76 72
Florent Baldairon, MD
principal investigator · Clinique du sport

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion