ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07019298Updated Jun 13, 2025

Success of Endodontic Treatment With Different Obturation Techniques and Sealer Cements

An interventional study of AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) and NeoSealer Flo in Pulpitis, Periapical Lesions and Periapical Periodontitis, sponsored by University of Siena. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-13.

Sponsored by University of Siena · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
270
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present study aims to compare the radiographic success of endodontic treatment using Orstavik's criteria between two sealers: AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and Neosealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida, USA), as well as between two obturation techniques: continuous wave and single cone. The study includes 270 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Clinical and radiographic variables will be assessed, including quality of obturation, lesion healing, and restoration. The study seeks to determine if the use of bioceramic sealer is effective regardless of the obturation technique used, highlighting the importance of clinical follow-up to evaluate endodontic treatment success.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulpitis
  • Periapical Lesions
  • Periapical Periodontitis
  • Periapical Pathology

Keywords

  • Endodontics
  • Endodontic Sealer
  • Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer
  • Ah Plus
03

In context

Pulpitis

316 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulpitis; 90 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 270 is above the median of 64 across 288 interventional studies indexed under Pulpitis.

Browse Pulpitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Siena is the lead sponsor of 65 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 18 years and older. Teeth with a diagnosis of pulpal necrosis or irreversible pulpitis. provided for data usage.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic conditions that may impair healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, ).
  • Teeth with root fractures, resorption, or open apices.
  • Incomplete clinical or radiographic records.
  • Cases with poor-quality radiographs or lack of standardization for evaluation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
270 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    AH Plus + Continuous Wave Condensation

    Root canal obturation using AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) and the continuous wave technique with thermoplasticized gutta-percha

    Procedure: AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) · Procedure: Continuous Wave Condensation

  • Active comparator
    AH Plus + Single Cone

    Root canal obturation using AH Plus and the single cone technique with cold gutta-percha.

    Procedure: AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) · Procedure: Single Cone Technique

  • Experimental
    NeoSealer Flo + Continuous Wave

    Root canal obturation using NeoSealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Houston, TX, USA) and the continuous wave technique.

    Procedure: NeoSealer Flo · Procedure: Continuous Wave Condensation

  • Experimental
    NeoSealer Flo + Single Cone

    Root canal obturation using NeoSealer Flo and the single cone technique.

    Procedure: NeoSealer Flo · Procedure: Single Cone Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureAH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA)

    Root canal obturation using AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA), a resin-based sealer with low solubility and shrinkage. Used in combination with gutta-percha for root canal filling.

  • ProcedureNeoSealer Flo

    Root canal obturation using NeoSealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Houston, TX, USA), a premixed bioceramic sealer based on calcium silicate. Used in combination with gutta-percha to enhance apical healing and biocompatibility.

  • ProcedureContinuous Wave Condensation

    A warm vertical compaction technique using heat-softened gutta-percha to obturate the canal in three dimensions. Considered the gold standard for achieving dense and homogenous root canal fillings.

  • ProcedureSingle Cone Technique

    A cold hydraulic condensation technique using a single gutta-percha cone matched to the last rotary file, combined with a high-flow sealer. Designed for simplified obturation with minimal operator variability.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiographic Success Based on Periapical Index (PAI) Criteria

    Radiographic outcome will be assessed using the Periapical Index (PAI) by Ørstavik et al. (1986), which categorizes periapical healing from 1 (normal periapical structures) to 5 (severe apical periodontitis). Success is defined as PAI scores of 1 or 2 (complete healing or healing in progress). Evaluations will be based on periapical radiographs (and CBCT when available) taken at follow-up after at least 6 months. The assessment will be performed by a calibrated blinded evaluator using reference radiographs.

    Time frame: Minimum 6 months after root canal treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Success Based on Absence of Symptoms

    Clinical success will be defined by the absence of pain, tenderness to percussion or palpation, swelling, mobility, and other signs of persistent infection. These parameters will be evaluated through standard clinical examination during follow-up visits.

    Time frame: Minimum 6 months after treatment

  2. Radiographic Success Based on CBCT Evaluation

    When available, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images will be used to assess periapical healing. A modified periapical index (PAI-CBCT) will be used, evaluating the presence, size, and resolution of periapical radiolucencies. Lesion healing will be interpreted as success if there is full resolution or significant reduction in size compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Minimum 6 months after treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 158 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pulpitis, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 158 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 28.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 20, 2025
First posted
Jun 13, 2025
StartActual
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2029
Last update
Jun 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07019298
Lead sponsor
University of Siena
Responsible party
Simone Grandini (Prof, University of Siena) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 13, 2025
Start date
Jun 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 13, 2025

Study contacts

Giulia Malvicini, DDS
Contact
giulia.malvicini@student.unisi.it
+ 39 3487200168

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion