CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07018258ESP-POSTUREUpdated Feb 27, 2026

Optimal Patient Positioning for Erector Spinae Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:

An interventional study of Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Postoperative Pain, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Anesthesia, Regional, sponsored by Harran University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Harran University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy, analgesic consumption, and patient satisfaction of erector spinae plane (ESP) block administered in three different patient positions-lateral, prone, and sitting-in individuals undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study also evaluates the variation in skin-to-block site distance depending on patient positioning.

Read the detailed description

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a relatively recent regional anesthesia technique performed under ultrasound guidance, widely used for managing acute postoperative pain. While the ESP block is known for its safety, simplicity, and versatility, there is limited evidence regarding the influence of patient positioning on its clinical effectiveness and technical performance.

This prospective, randomized, single-blind study investigates the impact of administering bilateral ESP block at the T7 vertebral level in three different patient positions: lateral decubitus, prone, and sitting. The study includes adult patients (aged 18-65, ASA I-II) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.

Primary outcomes include postoperative pain scores (VAS and NRS). Secondary outcomes include total rescue analgesic consumption (tramadol), time to first analgesic requirement, patient satisfaction scores (Likert scale), and measurement of the skin-to-block site distance across different positions. Data will be collected at defined intervals up to 24 hours postoperatively.

The findings are expected to inform clinicians on the optimal patient positioning for ESP block to enhance block efficacy and patient comfort during laparoscopic abdominal surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  • Anesthesia, Regional
  • Pain Management

Keywords

  • Erector Spinae Plane Block
  • Patient Positioning
  • Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Harran University is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • ASA physical status I-II
  • Ability to understand and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • History of chronic opioid use or substance abuse
  • Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy
  • Local infection at the block site
  • Severe spinal deformities or scoliosis
  • BMI > 35 kg/m²
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Refusal to participate in the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lateral Position Group

    Patients in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block

  • Experimental
    Prone Position Group

    Patients in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block

  • Experimental
    Sitting Position Group

    Patients in this group will receive bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block at the T7 level in the lateral decubitus position under ultrasound guidance before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureErector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block

    Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block performed at the T7 vertebral level. The intervention will be applied in three different patient positions-lateral, prone, or sitting-prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Also known as: Ultrasound-guided ESP block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) at multiple time points following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The goal is to compare postoperative pain scores between patient groups receiving ESP block in lateral, prone, or sitting positions.

    Time frame: 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Postoperative Analgesic Consumption

    The cumulative dose (mg) of tramadol administered as rescue analgesia within the first 24 hours postoperatively will be recorded for each group.

    Time frame: First 24 hours after surgery

  2. Time to First Analgesic Request

    The duration (in minutes) between the end of surgery and the patient's first request for additional analgesia.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours postoperatively

  3. Patient Satisfaction Score

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  4. Skin-to-Target Distance

    The distance (in millimeters) from the skin to the ESP block site will be measured via ultrasound at the T7 level in each patient position to determine anatomical variation.

    Time frame: During preoperative ESP block procedure

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Veli Fahri Pehlivan
    Sanliurfa, 63100, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07018258
Lead sponsor
Harran University
Responsible party
Veli Fahri Pehlivan (Assistant Professor, Harran University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2025
Start date
Jun 27, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 10, 2025
Completion
Dec 10, 2025
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Veli F Pehlivan, Asiss Prof
principal investigator · Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion