ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07014059Updated Oct 21, 2026

Autologous Serum Obtained by a Closed-Circuit Collection Device

A Phase 2 interventional study of Autologous Serum 20% in GVHD, Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder) and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, sponsored by GIANCARLO FATOBENE. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by GIANCARLO FATOBENE · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 21, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Autologous serum eye drops (ASED) are an established therapy for ocular surface diseases; however, their preparation can be costly and may not be available due to the need for germ-free conditions. This pilot trial assesses the feasibility of collecting ASED in a closed-circuit system for patients with chronic ocular surface diseases.

Read the detailed description

Autologous Serum exhibits characteristics very similar to those of tears, such as pH, osmolarity, vitamins, and Immunoglobulin A. It also contains growth factors, nutritional factors, and antibacterial components that are necessary for the maintenance of cellular viability in the epithelial repair process. The use of autologous serum eye drops was first described in 1984 by Fox et al., in research for a preservative-free tear substitute. Subsequently, in 1999, Tsubota et al. found that, due to the presence of growth factors and vitamins, autologous serum could have a true epithelial trophic potential for the ocular surface. The autologous serum eye drops are not only a lubricant for the ocular surface but also provide various essential substances for the reconstruction of epithelial damage, including vitamin A, epithelial growth factor, fibronectin, and a variety of cytokines. With these epithelial trophic factors, autologous serum facilitates proliferation, migration, and differentiation of the ocular surface epithelium. Moreover, it is known for its anti-catabolic properties, inhibiting the inflammatory cascade triggered by interleukin-1, which prevents tissue destruction. Therefore, autologous serum eye drops have been effective in the treatment of persistent epithelial defects, neurotrophic ulcers, superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis, dry eye conditions, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or after refractive surgeries, such as LASIK (Laser Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis). In 2020, Wang et al. published an article with 7 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of autologous serum versus artificial tears in patients with dry eye syndrome. In the meta-analysis, all 7 studies evaluated subjective symptoms and showed that autologous serum eye drops were superior to ocular lubricants in alleviating and remitting symptoms. It was shown that autologous serum eye drops significantly improved parameters such as OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index), tear break-up time, and Bengal Rose staining when compared to the control group using ocular lubricants. Given the numerous properties of autologous serum eye drops, there is no doubt about their benefit and effectiveness in treating several ocular surface diseases, including ocular GVHD. However, the difficulty in accessing production and the substantial cost of autologous serum eye drops are the main challenges, and their use is often limited to more severe dry eye cases and those refractory to conventional treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • GVHD
  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder)
  • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
  • Limbal Keratoconjunctivitis
  • Recurrent Erosions of Persistent Epithelial Defects
  • Neurotrophic Ulcer
  • Sjogren Syndrome With Keratoconjunctivitis

Keywords

  • soro autologo
  • gvhd
  • Sjogren's Syndrome (SS)
  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder)
  • Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
  • Limbal Keratoconjunctivitis
  • Neurotrophic Ulcer
  • Recurrent Erosions of Persistent Epithelial Defects
  • Study Protocol - Autologous Serum
  • Autologous Serum
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 16 is below the median of 50 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with GIANCARLO FATOBENE as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years
  • Dry eye and/or chronic epithelial defects of the ocular surface with indication for autologous serum according to the evaluation of ophthalmologists specialized in Cornea and Ocular Surface;
  • Peripheral venous access or PICC that allows the collection of whole blood.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active ocular infection;
  • \< 11 g/dL;
  • Angina, MI, or stroke in the last 30 days;
  • Significant pulmonary or cardiac disease that contraindicates autologous serum collection in the investigator's opinion;
  • Active ocular or systemic infection at the time of collection;
  • Inability to attend follow-up visits at 6 and 12 weeks;
  • Active hematological (except measurable residual disease) or solid malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer);
  • Positive for , , , HTLV, Chagas disease, or syphilis;
  • \< 6 months;
  • Not pregnant (as reported by the participant).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Production of autologous serum in a closed system for ocular use

    Drug: Autologous Serum 20%

Interventions

  • DrugAutologous Serum 20%

    The collection of autologous serum in a closed blood processing system for ocular use

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of using the collection device under testing

    Proportion of blood collections that resulted in successful production of final autologous serum containers suitable for patient use.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Median pre-freezing number of leukocytes in autologous serum

    0.0-0.03x10ˆ3/mcL;

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Median pre-freezing number of red blood cells in autologous serum

    0.0-0.03x10ˆ6/mcL;

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Median pre-freezing number of platelets in autologous serum

    0.0-0.03x10ˆ3/mcL;

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Median pre and post-freezing pH in autologous serum

    7.00-7.50;

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Pre-freezing microbiological test of autologous serum

    Positive or negative;

    Time frame: 2 years

  6. NIH ocular score

    0-3

    Time frame: baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and end of treatment

  7. Ocular Surface Disease Index

    Reported by the patient from 0 to 100

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and end of treatment

  8. Global ocular symptom score

    Reported by the patient from 0 to 10

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and end of treatment

  9. Lee score ocular subscale

    Reported by the patient from 0 to 100

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and end of treatment

  10. Corneal staining score (fluorescein)

    Bijsterveld scale: 0-9.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  11. Corneal staining score (Rose Bengal)

    Bijsterveld scale: 0-9.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  12. Meibography

    Good, moderate, poor

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  13. Schirmer test

    0-30 mm in 5 minutes

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  14. Non-invasive tear film break-up

    0-50 seconds

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  15. Tear film lipid layer

    0-3

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  16. Adherence to the use of autologous serum

    Percentage of doses administered vs. planned doses: 0-100%

    Time frame: At 6 and 12 weeks post-treatment

  17. Patient's qualitative evaluation of the use of autologous serum

    Qualitative questionnaire

    Time frame: At 12 weeks post-treatment

  18. Team's qualitative perception of the feasibility of collection and production of autologous serum

    Qualitative questionnaire

    Time frame: At 50% of planned recruitment

Other outcomes

  1. Pre- and post-growth factor in autologous serum

    EGF, PDGF, NGF, Substance P, hialuronic acida, vitamin A and Vitamin D

    Time frame: two years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 19 months after the start.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 21, 2026: primary completion Jun 2026 → Feb 2027 and completion Jun 2027 → Mar 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 21, 2025
First posted
Jun 10, 2025
StartActual
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 1, 2027was Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Mar 1, 2027was Jun 2027
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Oct 21, 2026
Sites
1 site added, 1 site removed
Show site
  • HCFMUSP · São Paulo, Brazil
Show 1 removed
  • HCFMUSP · São Paulo, Brazil
Oct 21, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 20, 2026→Feb 1, 2027
Oct 21, 2026
Study completion
Jun 20, 2027→Mar 1, 2027
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • HCFMUSP · São Paulo, Brazil
    Show 1 removed
    • HCFMUSP · São Paulo, Brazil
    Primary completion Jun 20, 2026→Feb 1, 2027
    Study completion Jun 20, 2027→Mar 1, 2027
    + 4 other changes: index terms, verification date, oversight details and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07014059
Lead sponsor
GIANCARLO FATOBENE
Collaborators
JP Farma
Responsible party
GIANCARLO FATOBENE (MD, PhD, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 10, 2025
Start date
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion